Imaging CSEM data in the presence of electrical anisotropy - eScholarship

IMAGING CSEM DATA IN THE PRESENCE OF ELECTRICAL ANISOTROPY Gregory A. Newman * , Michael Commer * and James J. Carazzone + Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley California ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston Texas Email: ganewman@lbl.gov ABSTRACT Formation anisotropy should be incorporated into the analysis of controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) data because failure to do so can produce serious artifacts in the resulting resistivity images for certain data configurations of interest. This finding is demonstrated in model and case studies. Sensitivity to horizontal resistivity will be strongest in the broadside electric field data where detectors are offset from the tow line. Sensitivity to the vertical resistivity is strongest for over flight data where the transmitting antenna passes directly over the detecting antenna. Consequently, consistent treatment of both over flight and broadside electric field measurements requires an anisotropic modeling assumption. To produce a consistent resistivity model for such data we develop and employ a 3D CSEM imaging algorithm that treats transverse anisotropy. The algorithm is based upon non-linear conjugate gradients and full wave equation modeling. It exploits parallel computing systems to effectively treat 3D imaging problems and CSEM data volumes of industrial size. Here we use it to demonstrate the anisotropic imaging process on model and field data sets from the North Sea and offshore Brazil. We also verify that isotropic imaging of over flight data alone produces an image generally consistent with the vertical resistivity. However, superior data fits are obtained when the same over flight data are analyzed assuming an anisotropic resistivity model.

[1]  James J. Carazzone,et al.  Three Dimensional Imaging of Marine CSEM Data , 2005 .

[2]  Michael Commer,et al.  Inversion study of a large marine CSEM survey , 2008 .

[3]  Steven Constable,et al.  Marine electromagnetic methods—A new tool for offshore exploration , 2006 .

[4]  Aria Abubakar,et al.  Inversion of controlled‐source electromagnetic data using a model‐based approach , 2010 .

[5]  Lucy MacGregor,et al.  Derisking exploration prospects using integrated seismic and electromagnetic data—a Falkland Islands case study , 2007 .

[6]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  3d modeling of a deepwater EM exploration survey , 2006 .

[7]  Leslie A. Wahrmund,et al.  R3M Case Studies: Detecting Reservoir Resistivity In Complex Settings , 2005 .

[8]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Solution Accelerators For Large-scale 3D Electromagnetic Inverse Problems , 2004 .

[9]  Hans Erik Foss Amundsen,et al.  Subsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding , 2005 .

[10]  Lucy MacGregor,et al.  Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas , 2002 .

[11]  Duccio Fanelli,et al.  Electron tomography: a short overview with an emphasis on the absorption potential model for the forward problem , 2008 .

[12]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[13]  Dennis E. Willen,et al.  CSEM Inversion: Impact of Anisotropy, Data Coverage, And Initial Models , 2008 .

[14]  René-Édouard Plessix,et al.  Regularized and Blocky 3D Controlled Source Electromagnetic Inversion , 2008 .

[15]  M. J. Tompkins,et al.  Effects of Vertical Anisotropy on Marine Active Source Electromagnetic Data and Inversions , 2004, 66th EAGE Conference & Exhibition.

[16]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional induction logging problems, Part 2: A finite-difference solution , 2002 .

[17]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Electromagnetic induction in a fully 3‐D anisotropic earth , 2000 .

[18]  Michael Commer,et al.  Massively parallel electrical-conductivity imaging of hydrocarbons using the IBM Blue Gene/L supercomputer , 2008, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[19]  Sofia Davydycheva,et al.  A Finite Difference Scheme for Elliptic Equations with Rough Coefficients Using a Cartesian Grid Nonconforming to Interfaces , 1999 .

[20]  René-Édouard Plessix,et al.  Resistivity imaging with controlled-source electromagnetic data: depth and data weighting , 2008 .

[21]  Michael J. Tompkins,et al.  The Role of Vertical Anisotropy In Interpreting Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Data , 2005 .

[22]  Chester J. Weiss,et al.  Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods, Part II -Modeling and analysis in 3D , 2006 .

[23]  Astrid Kornberg Bjørke,et al.  3D Inversion of Marine CSEM Data Using a Fast Finite-difference Time-domain Forward Code And Approximate Hessian-based Optimization , 2008 .

[24]  Lu Xinyou,et al.  Understanding Anisotropy In Marine CSEM Data , 2007 .

[25]  René-Édouard Plessix,et al.  3D CSEMmodeling And Inversion In Complex Geological Settings , 2007 .

[26]  Michael Commer,et al.  New advances in three‐dimensional controlled‐source electromagnetic inversion , 2007 .

[27]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Rigorous 3D inversion of marine CSEM data based on the integral equation method , 2007 .

[28]  Svein Ellingsrud,et al.  The Meter Reader—Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers by seabed logging (SBL): Results from a cruise offshore Angola , 2002 .

[29]  Michael Commer,et al.  Three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric joint inversion , 2009 .

[30]  David Andreis,et al.  Controlled-source electromagnetic imaging on the Nuggets-1 reservoir , 2006 .