Willingness to Continue with Software Projects: Effects of Feedback Direction and Optimism under High and Low Accountability Conditions

The willingness of managers to continue with software projects can be both beneficial and troubling. Management optimism can help bring promising projects to fruition, but can also cause valuable resources to be expended on faltering projects. This study examines three factors that can affect the willingness of managers to continue with software projects: feedback direction, feedback optimism, and accountability. Feedback direction is the objective information reflecting project prospects. Feedback optimism is the subjective mode with which the objective information has been framed. Accountability is the extent to which the manager feels responsible for project outcomes. Results of a study that manipulated these three factors showed that the effects of feedback direction and feedback optimism on willingness to continue with software projects were additive (either factor alone affected willingness to continue with software projects) when accountability was high but were interactive (both factors jointly affected willingness to continue with software projects) when accountability was low. These findings have useful implications for practice and further research.

[1]  Roger C. Mayer,et al.  Escalation of Commitment and the Framing Effect: An Empirical Investigation , 1994 .

[2]  William Remus,et al.  Does Feedback Improve the Accuracy of Recurrent Judgmental Forecasts , 1996 .

[3]  Jeffrey B. Vancouver,et al.  Feedback Inquiry: The Effect of Source Attributes and Individual Differences , 1995 .

[4]  Zbigniew H. Przasnyski,et al.  On Information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[5]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Managerial Overcommitment in Corporate Acquisition Processes , 1994 .

[7]  Charles H. Schwenk.  Information, Cognitive Biases, and Commitment to a Course of Action , 1986 .

[8]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  A study of escalating commitment in principal–agent relationships: Effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. , 1998 .

[9]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The framing of relative performance feedback: Seeing the glass as half empty or half full. , 1994 .

[10]  R. Ashton,et al.  Students As Surrogates In Behavioral Accounting Research - Some Evidence , 1980 .

[11]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach , 1993 .

[12]  D. Frisch.  Reasons for framing effects. , 1993 .

[13]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Organizational decision making: The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal , 1996 .

[14]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  Understanding Runaway Information Technology Projects: Results from an International Research Program Based on Escalation Theory , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  James P. Walsh,et al.  An attributional analysis of decisions about making commitments , 1989 .

[17]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[18]  Pamela J. Fink,et al.  If at First You Don’t Succeed , 1993 .

[19]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[20]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[21]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Role of Project Completion Information in Resource Allocation Decisions , 1993 .

[22]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[23]  Stephanie Newport,et al.  Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action , 1991 .

[24]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Decision failures: why they occur and how to prevent them , 1991 .

[25]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[26]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. , 1993 .

[27]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[28]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Diffusibility of Blame: Effects on Persistence in a Project , 1987 .

[29]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Information Requests in the Context of Escalation , 1986 .

[30]  Joel Brockner,et al.  If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: Effects of persistence-performance contingencies, ego involvement, and self-esteem on task persistence. , 1988 .

[31]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Justification of Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[32]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  The Relevance of Kahneman and Tversky's Concept of Framing to Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[33]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[34]  H. Drummond.  DE-ESCALATION IN DECISION MAKING: A CASE OF A DISASTROUS PARTNERSHIP* , 1995 .

[35]  Michael G. Bowen.  The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Dilemmas or Decision Errors? , 1987 .

[36]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[37]  A. C. Rogers,et al.  De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration : when sunk costs and negative feedback coincide , 1990 .

[38]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[39]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Escalation at the Credit Window: A Longitudinal Study of Bank Executives' Recognition and Write-Off of Problem Loans , 1997 .

[40]  A. Teger,et al.  Too Much Invested to Quit , 1980 .

[41]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions , 1986 .

[42]  J. Rodin,et al.  Is bad news always bad? Cue and feedback effects on intrinsic motivation. , 1989 .

[43]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the roles of choice and justification , 1994 .

[44]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  The Effects of Explicit Goals and Specific Feedback on Escalation Processes , 1989 .

[45]  Patricia J. Holahan,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Responses to Failure: The Effects of Choice and Responsibility on Impression Management , 1982 .

[47]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  An Empirical Test of Staw and Ross's Prescriptions for the Management of Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Organizations* , 1989 .

[48]  W. Remus,et al.  Does feedback improve the accuracy of recurrent judgmental forecasts? , 1996, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Reactions to Feedback: The Role of Attributions , 1985 .

[50]  Bruce E. McCain.  Continuing Investment Under Conditions of Failure: A Laboratory Study of the Limits to Escalation , 1986 .

[51]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Escalation of Commitment to an Ineffective Course of Action: The Effect of Feedback Having Negative Implications for Self-Identity. , 1986 .

[52]  F D Schoorman,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  J. Brockner.  The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[54]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment in an experimenting society: A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. , 1980 .

[55]  B. E. McCain,et al.  Continuing Investment Under Conditions of Failure: A Laboratory Study of the Limits to Escalation , 1986 .

[56]  Steve Williams,et al.  Behavioral Causality Orientations and Investment Decisions Following Negative Feedback , 1993 .

[57]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making , 1986 .