How yield relates to ash content, Delta 13C and Delta 18O in maize grown under different water regimes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Stable isotopes have proved a valuable phenotyping tool when breeding for yield potential and drought adaptation; however, the cost and technical skills involved in isotope analysis limit its large-scale application in breeding programmes. This is particularly so for Delta(18)O despite the potential relevance of this trait in C(4) crops. The accumulation of minerals (measured as ash content) has been proposed as an inexpensive way to evaluate drought adaptation and yield in C(3) cereals, but little is known of the usefulness of this measure in C(4) cereals such as maize (Zea mays). The present study investigates how yield relates to ash content, Delta(13)C and Delta(18)O, and evaluates the use of ash content as an alternative or complementary criterion to stable isotopes in assessing yield potential and drought resistance in maize. METHODS A set of tropical maize hybrids developed by CIMMYT were subjected to different water availabilities, in order to induce water stress during the reproductive stages under field conditions. Ash content and Delta(13)C were determined in leaves and kernels. In addition, Delta(18)O was measured in kernels. KEY RESULTS Water regime significantly affected yield, ash content and stable isotopes. The results revealed a close relationship between ash content in leaves and the traits informing about plant water status. Ash content in kernels appeared to reflect differences in sink-source balance. Genotypic variation in grain yield was mainly explained by the combination of ash content and Delta(18)O, whilst Delta(13)C did not explain a significant percentage of such variation. CONCLUSIONS Ash content in leaves and kernels proved a useful alternative or complementary criterion to Delta(18)O in kernels for assessing yield performance in maize grown under drought conditions.

[1]  J. Diels,et al.  Differential 13C Isotopic Discrimination in Maize at Varying Water Stress and at Low to High Nitrogen Availability , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[2]  B. L. O’dell,et al.  Distribution of phytate and nutritionally important elements among the morphological components of cereal grains , 1972 .

[3]  J. Araus,et al.  The combined effect of constant water deficit and nitrogen supply on WUE, NUE and Δ13C in durum wheat potted plants , 2007 .

[4]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Transpiration ratio and plant mineral content are related among genotypes of a range of species , 1992 .

[5]  A. Condon,et al.  Breeding for high water-use efficiency. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  G. Hammer,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination varies genetically in c(4) species. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[7]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Conifers, Angiosperm Trees, and Lianas: Growth, Whole-Plant Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency, and Stable Isotope Composition (δ13C and δ18O) of Seedlings Grown in a Tropical Environment1[W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[8]  W. Bowman,et al.  Short-Term Changes in Leaf Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Salt- and Water-Stressed C4 Grasses , 1989 .

[9]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Differential 18O enrichment of leaf cellulose in C3 versus C4 grasses. , 2002, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[10]  R. Ramesh,et al.  Oxygen isotope enrichment (Δ18O) as a measure of time-averaged transpiration rate , 2005 .

[11]  J. Hanway.  How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[12]  W. Tanner,et al.  Does transpiration have an essential function in long-distance ion transport in plants ? , 1990 .

[13]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Traditional approaches to breeding for drought resistance in cereals. , 1989 .

[14]  A. Condon,et al.  Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat , 2002 .

[15]  José Luis Araus,et al.  Relationships between ash content, carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat , 1998 .

[16]  Abraham Blum,et al.  Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress , 2009 .

[17]  J. Araus,et al.  Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? , 2002, Annals of botany.

[18]  T. Mccaig,et al.  Gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and productivity in winter wheat , 1993 .

[19]  F. Chen,et al.  Mechanisms and Genes Involved in Germination Sensu Stricto , 2007 .

[20]  O. Merah,et al.  Ash content might predict carbon isotope discrimination and grain yield in durum wheat. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[21]  H. F. Mayland,et al.  Ash, Carbon Isotope Discrimination, and Silicon as Estimators of Transpiration Efficiency in Crested Wheatgrass , 1993 .

[22]  J. Araus,et al.  Grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination and mineral content in mature kernels of barley under irrigated and rainfed conditions , 1994 .

[23]  O. Merah,et al.  Grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination, mineral and silicon content in durum wheat under different precipitation regimes , 1999 .

[24]  J. Ogée,et al.  Non-steady-state, non-uniform transpiration rate and leaf anatomy effects on the progressive stable isotope enrichment of leaf water along monocot leaves. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[25]  J. Araus,et al.  Water and nitrogen conditions affect the relationships of Δ13C and Δ18O to gas exchange and growth in durum wheat , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  G. Hammer,et al.  Correlation between carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in lines of the C-4 species Sorghum bicolor in the glasshouse and the field , 1998 .

[27]  A. Blum.  Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? , 2005 .

[28]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Breeding for Yield Potential and Stress Adaptation in Cereals , 2008 .

[29]  G. Farquhar,et al.  On the Nature of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in C4 Species , 1983 .

[30]  A. Tiessen,et al.  Future progress in drought tolerance in maize needs new secondary traits and cross combinations , 2008, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[31]  J. Araus,et al.  Relationships of grain δ13C and δ18O with wheat phenology and yield under water‐limited conditions , 2007 .

[32]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Source : sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize:: II. Nitrogen metabolism during grain filling , 1999 .

[33]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Transpiration efficiency of a tropical pioneer tree (Ficus insipida) in relation to soil fertility. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[34]  F. Zapata,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination, leaf ash content and grain yield in bread and durum wheat grown under full-irrigated conditions , 2004 .

[35]  Javed Akhter,et al.  Using carbon isotope discrimination to select maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines and hybrids for drought tolerance , 2007 .

[36]  I. Romagosa,et al.  Mineral accumulation, carbon isotope discrimination and indirect selection for grain yield in two-rowed barley grown under semiarid conditions , 1998 .

[37]  G. Hammer,et al.  On the extent of genetic variation for transpiration efficiency in sorghum , 1997 .

[38]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[39]  Elizabeth A. Stockdale,et al.  Research in organic production systems – past, present and future , 2007, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[40]  A. Diallo,et al.  Progress from selection in eight tropical maize populations using international testing , 1986 .

[41]  J. Araus,et al.  Effect of leaf structure and water status on carbon isotope discrimination in field‐grown durum wheat , 1997 .

[42]  G. Edmeades,et al.  The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize , 1996 .

[43]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: From theory to practice , 2000 .

[44]  José Luis Araus,et al.  Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions , 2003 .

[45]  J. Araus,et al.  Physiological traits for improving wheat yield under a wide range of conditions , 2007 .

[46]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Oxygen isotope ratio of leaf and grain material correlates with stomatal conductance and grain yield in irrigated wheat , 2000 .

[47]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Isotopic Composition of Plant Carbon Correlates With Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat Genotypes , 1984 .

[48]  Jordi Voltas,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain , 1999 .

[49]  J. Lott.  Accumulation of seed reserves of phosphorus and other minerals , 1984 .

[50]  J. Araus,et al.  Recent Advances in Breeding Maize for Drought and Salinity Stress Tolerance , 2007 .

[51]  José Luis Araus,et al.  Oxygen isotope enrichment (Delta(18)O) reflects yield potential and drought resistance in maize. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[52]  M. Barbour.  Stable oxygen isotope composition of plant tissue: a review. , 2007, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[53]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[54]  J. Araus,et al.  Basis of the Relationship between Ash Content in the Flag Leaf and Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Kernels of Durum Wheat , 2001, Photosynthetica.