MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T.

To clarify the choice of imaging parameters for optimal gradient-recalled echo MR scanning of joints, we analyzed the behavior of contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for spoiled (i.e., fast low-angle shot [FLASH] or spoiled GRASS) and steady-state (i.e., gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state [GRASS] or fast imaging with steady precession) techniques at 1.5 T. The analysis is based on tissue characteristics derived from spin-echo measurements of hyaline cartilage and synovial fluid signal in the patellofemoral joints of 11 volunteers. Separate analysis of contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for multiplanar (long TR) acquisitions shows that these parameters are each improved compared with single-slice methods. At TRs greater than 250 msec, there is no significant difference in the contrast behavior of FLASH and GRASS. For optimal contrast-to-noise ratio (synovial fluid-cartilage), the best multiplanar sequence (for TE less than 23 msec) is with a short TE and a large flip angle (e.g., 400/9/73 degrees [TR/TE/flip angle]). If a single-scan or three-dimensional technique is desired, than a GRASS sequence at minimal TR and TE and intermediate flip angle (18/9/32 degrees) is best. For optimal signal-to-noise ratio (for both synovial fluid and hyaline cartilage), the best multiplanar sequence uses a short TE and an intermediate flip angle (e.g., 400/9/30 degrees). If a short TR, high signal-to-noise technique is desired, then GRASS (18/9/13 degrees) is superior to FLASH.

[1]  J. Groen,et al.  Fast Field Echo imaging: an overview and contrast calculations. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  R R Edelman,et al.  Contrast in rapid MR imaging: T1- and T2-weighted imaging. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  MRI of the patellofemoral joint. , 1994, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[4]  I. Young,et al.  Variations in slice shape and absorption as artifacts in the determination of tissue parameters in NMR imaging , 1985, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  J N Lee,et al.  A modified saturation‐recovery approximation for multiple spin‐echo pulse sequences , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  W. F. Conway,et al.  Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation. , 1990, Radiology.

[7]  G. Bongartz,et al.  Degenerative cartilage lesions of the hip--magnetic resonance evaluation. , 1989, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  S. Carmichael,et al.  MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: Evaluation of two‐ and three‐dimensional sequences , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M Deimling,et al.  Cartilage disorders: comparison of spin-echo, CHESS, and FLASH sequence MR images. , 1987, Radiology.

[10]  J. Mugler,et al.  Optimization of parameter values for complex pulse sequences by simulated annealing: Application to 3D MP‐RAGE imaging of the brain , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  H. Rechl,et al.  Structure, function, and degeneration of bovine hyaline cartilage: assessment with MR imaging in vitro. , 1989, Radiology.