Birds of a feather: Interpolating distribution patterns of urban birds

Geostatistical methods provide valuable approaches for analyzing spatial patterns of ecological systems. They allow for both the prediction and visualization of ecological phenomena, a combination that is essential for the conceptual development and testing of ecological theory. Yet, many ecologists remain unfamiliar with the application of these techniques. Here, we apply the methodology of geostatistics to an urban avian census in order to investigate and illustrate the utility of these tools. We derive habitat probability maps for three bird species known to differentially occupy the urban to rural gradient within the Phoenix metropolitan area and surrounding desert (Arizona, USA). We aggregated avian censuses conducted seasonally at 40 sites over two years and applied two processes process of interpolation, ordinary Kriging and indicator Kriging, and compared both methods. Ordinary Kriging interpolates values between measurements; however, it requires normally distributed data, which is commonly invalidated in ecological censuses. While indicator Kriging is not able to produce numerical predictions of measurements, it has the advantages of not requiring normally distributed data and requiring fewer statistical decisions. Each of the species exhibited strong deviations from normality due to many observations of zero. Given the skewness of the data, we anticipated that indicator Kriging would be a more appropriate method of interpolation. However, we found that both methods adequately captured spatial distribution of the three species and are sufficient for creating distribution maps of avian species. With additional census monitoring, Kriging can be used to detect long-term changes in population distribution of avian and other wildlife populations.

[1]  J. E. Crouch Distribution and Habitat Relationships of the Phainopepla , 1943 .

[2]  R. Blair Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[3]  D. Green,et al.  Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem , 2003 .

[4]  C. Gries,et al.  How Do Humans Restructure the Biodiversity of the Sonoran Desert , 2005 .

[5]  John T. Emlen,et al.  An Urban Bird Community in Tucson, Arizona: Derivation, Structure, Regulation , 1974 .

[6]  R. Schweinsburg,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BREEDING BIRDS, HABITAT, AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN GREATER TUCSON, ARIZONA , 1998 .

[7]  R. Rempel,et al.  The influence of sampling scheme and interpolation method on the power to detect spatial effects of forest birds in Ontario (Canada) , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation , 1997 .

[9]  M. Villard,et al.  ARE POINT COUNTS OF BOREAL SONGBIRDS RELIABLE PROXIES FOR MORE INTENSIVE ABUNDANCE ESTIMATORS? , 2006 .

[10]  Brian A. Maurer,et al.  GEOSTATISTICS AS A TOOL FOR EXAMINING HYPOTHESIZED DECLINES IN MIGRATORY SONGBIRDS , 1996 .

[11]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[12]  A. Journel Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions , 1983 .

[13]  E. Hodgson,et al.  Within-Field Distribution of the Sunflower Midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) , 2004 .

[14]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Statistical mapping of count survey data , 2002 .

[15]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[16]  G. Robertson Geostatistics in Ecology: Interpolating With Known Variance , 1987 .

[17]  J. Marzluff Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds , 2001 .

[18]  E. S. Keeping,et al.  Introduction to statistical inference , 1958 .

[19]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[20]  Mark Hostetler,et al.  Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems , 1999 .

[21]  W. Link,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION CHANGE FROM COUNT DATA: APPLICATION TO THE NORTH AMERICAN BREEDING BIRD SURVEY , 1998 .

[22]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[23]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[24]  G. Rosenberg,et al.  VALUE OF SUBURBAN HABITATS TO DESERT RIPARIAN BIRDS , 1987 .

[25]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Bird Census Techniques , 1992 .

[26]  Sam Droege,et al.  The Summer Atlas of North American Birds , 1995 .

[27]  N. Gotelli Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2003 .

[28]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[29]  Yanyuan Ma,et al.  Non-parametric statistics and robust methods , 2008 .

[30]  Madhusudan Katti,et al.  The Effects of Human Socioeconomic Status and Cultural Characteristics on Urban Patterns of Biodiversity , 2005 .

[31]  J. Michael Scott,et al.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2002 .

[32]  M Hugh-Jones,et al.  Geographical information systems as a tool in epidemiological assessment and wildlife disease management. , 2002, Revue scientifique et technique.

[33]  C. Gries,et al.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  A. Kolmogoroff Confidence Limits for an Unknown Distribution Function , 1941 .