In a transforming, complex, and innovating telecommunications industry with evolving business models, providers have to resolve how the pricing of their services in a context with many unknowns and few equations. This paper proposes a cost assignment model based on differentiating the set of required services a user consumes in a granular network architecture, to get a requested content. Unlike the flat rate model, this model is focused on obtaining a variable pricing methodology that reflects the actual use of network resources that users utilize to get specific content. There are exploring elements to establish the importance of this topic; the theoretical models of pricing are reviewed, the complexity of the costing issue and the influence of content providers on the real network operating cost are explored. Also, a precise cost model is proposed, as well as some cases of the application of the model in the real world. DOI: 10.4018/jwp.2012100102 20 International Journal of Web Portals, 4(4), 19-34, October-December 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. The proliferation of new business practices, such as new ways of network administration, prioritization, pricing, or strategic partnerships, suggests that the nature of the competence is changing, according to the maturity of the industry. It is argued that network neutrality and other proposals to restrict such practices have the risk of diverting the industry from its natural evolution path, while others claim the network neutrality has to be something sacred and must be a distinct market (Crowcroft, 2007; Yoo, 2010a). In the U.S. as in Europe, as a part of the 2020 digital agenda, studies to re-design the Internet Protocol, from scratch or evolutionarily, are sponsored. The acceleration of innovation and the rupturistic way in which new services appear on the Internet are a challenge, not only for public policies but also for the network architecture itself. The proliferation of Video Over IP Services, wireless broadband, cloud computing, programmable networks, sensors networks, and in general how people use the network, may require the Internet to be developed in new ways (Yoo, 2010b). Infrastructure Investment’s Sustainability Network operators with own infrastructure face a double challenge: the relative drop of prices and the continuous increase of bandwidth requested by users who consume more and more multimedia applications. The case par excellence is on TV over IP (IPTV), a service that provides multimedia content in real-time and high quality, whose performance is linked to the network conditions and particularly to a bandwidth that allows avoiding high rates of packet loss (Yuh-Chung, Chin-Shiuh, Bin-Yih, Wei-Lun, & Jui-Fang, 2010). The required investments to maintain the bandwidth growth can come from an increase in use of the existing services, an increasing of the number of users that employ new services, or the increasing in productivity-innovation by firms. A combination of these options will be the formula to support and develop the operators’ business model. The costs of an operator are known through financial statements that reflect the investments in equipment, software licenses, buildings, energy, personnel, advertising, amortization, etc., with a high degree of precision: the accounting precision. With this information it is possible to know the average cost per user, but to attribute a single user with the real cost, it is necessary to measure the use of network resources generated by that user. One option is to measure the volume of data exchanged with the network by each user; in fact, in mobile networks with Internet access, there are established limits of use at certain fees which, if exceeded, cause an extra cost to the user per amount of transferred data. At this point, it is necessary to reflect on the dispute between Internet Operators, which essentially provide connectivity through their infrastructure, and the Final Service Providers and Content Providers, who base their business model on the infrastructure of others without investing in it. Therefore, it is important to note how the network interconnection is made between Interconnecting Providers, and how a Content Provider accesses the network. The proposal exposed in this paper consists in associating the requests of the users to the services they consume; access to a television program, a telephone conversation, or the transmission from a sensor to a data collection center, would be examples of those services. This kind of services will be called Composed Services (CS), and will be considered as result of the union of Atomic Services (AS). Address resolution, coding, encryption, or the use of a particular bandwidth in an interconnection link, are examples of AS, which are resources that, together, constitute a CS that can respond to a user’s Service Request. The knowledge about the user’s navigation data, the CSs used and the ASs employed, would allow assigning each user a more accurate cost. The same model would serve to distribute the costs of the traffic between operators in a more fair way. 14 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/internet-cost-model-assignmentcosts/75529?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Computer Science, Security, and Information Technology, InfoSci-Digital Marketing, E-Business, and EServices eJournal Collection, InfoSci-Networking, Mobile Applications, and Web Technologies eJournal Collection, InfoSci-Select. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
[1]
Christof Weinhardt,et al.
Net neutrality
,
2013
.
[2]
Mihaela Muntean,et al.
BI Approach for Business Performance
,
2010
.
[3]
Michael Devetsikiotis,et al.
An overview of pricing concepts for broadband IP networks
,
2000,
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
[4]
Ichiroh Daitoh,et al.
Interconnection Agreement between Internet Service Providers and the Optimal Policy Intervention: The Case of Cournot-Type Competition Under Network Externalities*
,
2006
.
[5]
Cheng Chen,et al.
Pricing based differentiated bandwidth service
,
2009,
2009 4th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.
[6]
Ramzi El-Haddadeh,et al.
NGL02-4: Charging QoS Inter-Domain Networks: IntServ over DiffServ
,
2006,
IEEE Globecom 2006.
[7]
Josep Maria Monguet,et al.
Costing framework for service-oriented future internet architectures: empowering requester's choice
,
2011,
CFI.
[8]
Andrew T. Campbell,et al.
Pricing, provisioning and peering: dynamic markets for differentiated Internet services and implications for network interconnections
,
2000,
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.
[9]
Sunil Kumar,et al.
Bill-and-Keep peering
,
2008
.
[10]
B. Stiller,et al.
Pricing and Cost Recovery for Internet Services: Practical Review, Classification, and Application of Relevant Models
,
2001
.
[11]
Murat Yuksel,et al.
A strategy for implementing Smart Market pricing scheme on DiffServ
,
2002,
Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.
[12]
Yuh-Chung Lin,et al.
Video-on-Demand with Differentiated QoS based-on Available Bandwidth in IPTV
,
2010,
2010 Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing.
[13]
K. Janjua.
Future Telecom Markets and Strategy to Cope with the Change
,
2009
.
[14]
Bo-Shen Liou,et al.
Quality of service pricing network architecture supporting load balancing
,
2008,
2008 First IEEE International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing.
[15]
L. Röller,et al.
Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: a Simultaneous Approach Forschungsschwerpunkt Marktprozeß Und Unter- Nehmensentwicklung Research Area Market Processes and Corporate Development Abstract Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: a Simultaneous Approach *
,
1996
.
[16]
Christopher S. Yoo,et al.
The Changing Patterns of Internet Usage
,
2011
.
[17]
Jon Crowcroft,et al.
Net neutrality: the technical side of the debate: a white paper
,
2007,
CCRV.
[18]
Christopher Metz.
On the Wire: Interconnecting ISP Networks
,
2001,
IEEE Internet Comput..
[19]
Product Life Cycle Theory and the Maturation of the Internet
,
2009
.
[20]
Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.
Paris metro pricing for the internet
,
1999,
EC '99.