The Use of MIVES as a sustainability assessment MCDM method for architecture and civil engineering applications

Environmental and sustainability assessment tools have an important role in moving towards a better world, bringing knowledge and raising awareness. In the architecture and civil engineering sector, these assessment tools help in moving forward to constructions that have less economic, environmental and social impacts. At present, there are numerous assessment tools and methods with different approaches and scopes that have been analyzed in numerous technical reviews. However, there is no agreement about which method should be used for each evaluation case. This research paper synthetically analyzes the main sustainability assessment methods for the construction sector, comparing their strengths and weaknesses in order to present the challenges of the Spanish Integrated Value Model for Sustainability Assessment (MIVES). MIVES is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making method based on the value function concept and the Seminars of experts. Then, this article analyzes MIVES advantages and weak points by going through its methodology and two representative applications. At the end, the area of application of MIVES is described in detail along with the general application cases of the main types of assessment tools and methods.

[1]  Ali Diabat,et al.  Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach , 2015 .

[2]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[3]  Marta Brkovic,et al.  Where sustainable school meets the 'third teacher': primary school case study from Barcelona, Spain , 2015 .

[4]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles , 2005 .

[5]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making model for assessing the sustainability index of wind-turbine support systems: application to a new precast concrete alternative , 2016 .

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  M. Karthikeyan,et al.  Risk analysis and warning rate of hot environment for foundry industry using hybrid MCDM technique , 2015 .

[8]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the sustainability assessment of sewerage pipe systems , 2016 .

[9]  José M. González Barroso,et al.  Arquitectura escolar prefabricada a Catalunya. Presentació de la tesi i altres documents. , 2010 .

[10]  Wai K. Chong,et al.  Integrating G2G, C2C and resource flow analysis into life cycle assessment framework: A case of construction steel's resource loop , 2015 .

[11]  John D. Quale,et al.  Construction Matters: Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States , 2012 .

[12]  Kuei-Lun Chang,et al.  A Hybrid Program Projects Selection Model for Nonprofit TV Stations , 2015 .

[13]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[14]  Willem K. Brauers,et al.  Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society: A Revolution in Economic Thinking by Multi-objective Optimization , 2003 .

[15]  Barbara Zanuttigh,et al.  Participatory Design of Multi-Use Platforms at Sea , 2016 .

[16]  Bing Xue,et al.  The Decoupling of Resource Consumption and Environmental Impact from Economic Growth in China: Spatial Pattern and Temporal Trend , 2016 .

[17]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  Investment priorities for the management of hydraulic structures , 2015 .

[18]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Cooperatives as catalysts for sustainable neighborhoods – a qualitative analysis of the participatory development process toward a 2000-Watt Society , 2016 .

[19]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[20]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment method applied to structural concrete columns , 2013 .

[21]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Environmental impacts of prefabricated school buildings in Catalonia , 2011 .

[22]  José T. San-José,et al.  Health & Safety criteria for determining the sustainable value of construction projects , 2014 .

[23]  Jesús Cuadrado Rojo,et al.  Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability , 2010 .

[24]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review , 2014 .

[25]  K. Wong,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process , 2015 .

[26]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Optimal Staging Area Locations and Material Recycling Strategies for Sustainable Highway Reconstruction , 2014, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[27]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-Making Method for Sustainable Site Location of Post-Disaster Temporary Housing in Urban Areas , 2016 .

[28]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[29]  M. Branch,et al.  ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2014 , 2014 .

[30]  D. Crawley,et al.  Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the Green Building Challenge , 2001 .

[31]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[32]  J C HENRY,et al.  New construction. , 1962, Hospital progress.

[33]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[34]  Gaizka Ormazabal,et al.  Enhancing Value in Crucial Decisions: Line 9 of the Barcelona Subway , 2008 .

[35]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[36]  Francesca Thiebat,et al.  Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Temporary Building Constructions , 2015 .

[37]  Y. Asiedu,et al.  Product life cycle cost analysis: State of the art review , 1998 .

[38]  Willem K. Brauers,et al.  Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society: A Revolution in Economic Thinking by Multi-objective Optimization , 2003 .

[39]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  Future use of life-cycle assessment in civil engineering , 2013 .

[40]  Manuel Lara Coira,et al.  Assessing the global sustainability of different electricity generation systems , 2015 .

[41]  William E. Franklin,et al.  LCA — How it came about , 1996 .

[42]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[43]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  Sustainability as the key to prioritize investments in public infrastructures , 2016 .

[44]  Alfredo del Caño,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code , 2012 .

[45]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain , 2012 .

[46]  Francisco Labastida Azemar,et al.  Código técnico de la edificación (CTE) , 2006 .

[47]  Gerald Staib Components and Systems , 2008 .

[48]  Ola Eriksson,et al.  Quality versus impact: Comparing the environmental efficiency of building properties using the EcoEffect tool , 2010 .

[49]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  HYBRID MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING , 2016 .

[50]  José T. San-José,et al.  Approach to the quantification of the sustainable value in industrial buildings , 2007 .

[51]  P. Brunner,et al.  Material Flow Analysis as a Decision Support Tool for Waste Management: A Literature Review , 2015 .

[52]  S. E. Chidiac,et al.  Sustainability and resiliency metrics for buildings – Critical review , 2016 .

[53]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A novel hybrid social media platform selection model using fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[54]  Alfredo del Caño,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in the sustainable design of concrete structures: A probabilistic method , 2012 .

[55]  H. Wallbaum,et al.  Sustainability of Social Housing in Asia: A Holistic Multi-Perspective Development Process for Bamboo-Based Construction in the Philippines , 2016 .

[56]  Magnus Bonde,et al.  A post-occupancy evaluation of a green rated and conventional on-campus residence hall , 2015 .

[57]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach , 2015 .

[58]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making method for assessing the sustainability of post-disaster temporary housing units technologies: A case study in Bam, 2003 , 2016 .

[59]  José-Tomás San-José Lombera,et al.  A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings , 2010 .

[60]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Comments on “Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview” , 2012 .

[61]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[62]  武彦 福島 持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[63]  Selin Gundes,et al.  The Use of Life Cycle Techniques in the Assessment of Sustainability , 2016 .

[64]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview , 2011 .

[65]  A. Josa,et al.  A Value Function for Assessing Sustainability: Application to Industrial Buildings , 2010 .

[66]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  International Comparison of Sustainable Rating Tools , 2009 .

[67]  M. Macías,et al.  Metodología y herramienta VERDE para la evaluación de la sostenibilidad en edificios , 2010 .