Characterisation of pneumatic conveying systems using the Euler/Lagrange approach

Abstract This paper deals with the transport of solid particles in pneumatic conveying systems, namely a 5 m horizontal pipe, a 90° bend and 5 m a vertical pipe. The pipe diameter is 150 mm in all cases and the average conveying velocity is 27 m/s. Three-dimensional stationary numerical computations were performed by the Euler/Lagrange approach in connection with the k–e turbulence model accounting for full two-way coupling. Particle transport is calculated by considering all the relevant forces (including drag, gravity and transverse lift forces) and dispersion due to turbulence. Particle–wall collisions and wall roughness are modelled according to Sommerfeld and Huber [1] and inter-particle collisions are described by the stochastic modelling approach of Sommerfeld [2] . The objective of the present contribution is to demonstrate the capability of this computational approach for accurately predicting more complex pneumatic conveying systems where the transported powder has a rather wide size distribution. In particular the effect of inter-particle collisions will be demonstrated. As known from many single-phase studies a secondary flow is developing along the pipe bend. Since in the present study rather small glass powder is considered (i.e. 15 μm  D p [3] for validation in both, a long horizontal pipe (mass loading ratio η = 0.7) and the vertical pipe of the pipe system (mass loading ratio η = 0.3). The agreement between the predictions and the experimental results was found to be very good for both situations. Consequently, such numerical computations can largely support the understanding of the influence of the relevant elementary transport effects on the pneumatic conveying characteristics. Moreover, a detailed analysis of the segregation phenomena occurring in the bend and the influence of the particle phase on the flow structure can be performed by the calculations, which is hardly possible by an experiment. With the validation on the numerical computations by experiments, it is now possible to apply the computations for designing pneumatic conveying systems and predicting relevant integral parameters as for example the pressure drop. The calculated pressure drop for the pipe system yielded an excellent agreement with empirical correlations.

[1]  Th. Frank,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF A GAS-SOLID TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A HORIZONTAL CHANNEL , 1993 .

[2]  W. R. Dean LXXII. The stream-line motion of fluid in a curved pipe (Second paper) , 1928 .

[3]  Edward K. Levy,et al.  Investigation of gas–solid flow structure after a 90° vertical-to-horizontal elbow for low conveying gas velocities , 2005 .

[4]  M. M. Gibson,et al.  Laser-Doppler measurements of laminar and turbulent flow in a pipe bend , 1982 .

[5]  T. Lim,et al.  On the relation between centrifugal force and radial pressure gradient in flow inside curved and S-shaped ducts , 2008 .

[6]  M. Sommerfeld,et al.  Numerical calculation of pneumatic conveying in horizontal channels and pipes: Detailed analysis of conveying behaviour , 2012 .

[7]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Characterization of the cross-sectional particle concentration distribution in pneumatic conveying systems , 1994 .

[8]  R. Mei An approximate expression for the shear lift force on a spherical particle at finite reynolds number , 1992 .

[9]  M. Sumida,et al.  Experimental investigation on turbulent flow in a square-sectioned 90-degree bend , 1998 .

[10]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas-particle flow in a horizontal channel. Part II. Integral properties and validation , 2003 .

[11]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Wall roughness effects on pneumatic conveying of spherical particles in a narrow horizontal channel , 2004 .

[12]  Edward K. Levy,et al.  Roping phenomena in pulverized coal conveying lines , 1998 .

[13]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Experimental studies on particle behaviour and turbulence modification in horizontal channel flow with different wall roughness , 2002 .

[14]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Analysis of collision effects for turbulent gas–particle flow in a horizontal channel: Part I. Particle transport , 2003 .

[15]  M. Sommerfeld,et al.  Study of the numerical instabilities in Lagrangian tracking of bubbles and particles in two-phase flow , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  Hector Iacovides,et al.  Developing Turbulent Flow in a U-Bend of Circular Cross-Section: Measurement and Computation , 1986 .

[17]  N. Huber,et al.  Experimental analysis and modelling of particle-wall collisions , 1999 .

[18]  Santiago Laín,et al.  Numerical simulation of secondary flow in pneumatic conveying of solid particles in a horizontal circular pipe , 2009 .

[19]  Santiago Laín,et al.  Euler/Lagrange computations of pneumatic conveying in a horizontal channel with different wall roughness , 2008 .

[20]  Jack Legrand,et al.  Numerical investigation of bend and torus flows, part I : effect of swirl motion on flow structure in U-bend , 2004 .

[21]  Edward K. Levy,et al.  Gas–solid flow behavior in a horizontal pipe after a 90° vertical-to-horizontal elbow , 2001 .

[22]  M. Sommerfeld Validation of a stochastic Lagrangian modelling approach for inter-particle collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 2001 .

[23]  M. Sommerfeld,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES AND MODELLING OF FOUR-WAY COUPLING IN PARTICLE-LADEN HORIZONTAL CHANNEL FLOW , 2002, Proceeding of Second Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[24]  J. H. Whitelaw,et al.  Turbulent flow in a square duct with strong curvature , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  John Eustice,et al.  Flow of water in curved pipes , 1910 .

[26]  Benny Kuan,et al.  Dilute gas–solid two-phase flows in a curved 90∘ duct bend: CFD simulation with experimental validation , 2007 .

[27]  J. Whitelaw,et al.  Curved Ducts With Strong Secondary Motion: Velocity Measurements of Developing Laminar and Turbulent Flow , 1982 .

[28]  Yoshinobu Morikawa,et al.  Numerical simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow in a two-dimensional horizontal channel , 1987 .

[29]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  Modelling and numerical calculation of dilute-phase pneumatic conveying in pipe systems , 1998 .

[30]  Madhumita B. Ray,et al.  Dilute Gas-Solid Flows in Horizontal and Vertical Bends , 2005 .

[31]  B. Oesterlé,et al.  Experiments on the lift of a spinning sphere in a range of intermediate Reynolds numbers , 1998 .

[32]  R. Evans,et al.  Inertial deposition of particles in a bent pipe , 1977 .

[33]  W. R. Wagner,et al.  Correspondence: Grain boundaries in thin-film bicrystals of surface-reactive metals prepared by vacuum welding , 1974 .

[34]  M. Sommerfeld,et al.  FROM ELEMENTARY PROCESSES TO THE NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF INDUSTRIAL PARTICLE-LADEN FLOWS , 2009 .

[35]  P. Saffman The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  Jiyuan Tu,et al.  Numerical investigation into the effects of wall roughness on a gas–particle flow in a 90° bend , 2008 .

[37]  D. Ingham,et al.  The steady flow due to a rotating sphere at low and moderate Reynolds numbers , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  S. I. Rubinow,et al.  The transverse force on a spinning sphere moving in a viscous fluid , 1961, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[39]  C. Crowe,et al.  The Particle-Source-In Cell (PSI-CELL) Model for Gas-Droplet Flows , 1977 .

[40]  Edward K. Levy,et al.  Formation and dispersion of ropes in pneumatic conveying , 2001 .