The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure

Acquisition of segmental structure in first language acquisition is accomplished through the interaction of Universal Grammar and the learner's detection of phonemic contrasts in the input (Rice and Avery, 1995; Brown and Matthews, 1993,1997). This article investigates the acquisition of the English /l–r/,/b–v/ and /f–v/ contrasts by second language learners whose L1s do not contrast these segments. Based on L1 phonological acquisition and infant speech perception research,a model of phonological interference is developed which explains how the influence of the L1 phonology originates and identifies the level of phonological knowledge that impinges upon L2 acquisition. It is proposed that if a learner's L1 grammar lacks the phonological feature that differentiates a particular non-native contrast, he or she will be unable to perceive the contrast and therefore unable to acquire the novel segmental representations. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, two experimental studies were conducted. Experiment 1 investigates the acquisition of /l/ and /r/ by Chinese and Japanese speakers; the acquisition of the /l–r/, /b–v/ and /f–v/ contrasts by Japanese speakers is compared in experiment 2. The results from an AX discrimination task and a picture selection task indicate that successful acquisition of a non-native contrast is constrained by the learner's L1 grammar. Differences between Chinese and Japanese speakers (experiment 1) and differences in the acquisition of several different contrasts among Japanese speakers (experiment 2) are argued to reflect subtle phonological properties of the learners' respective L1s. These findings demonstrate that a speaker's L1 grammar may actually impede the operation of UG, preventing the L2 learner from acquiring a non-native phonemic contrast.

[1]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  R. Stark,et al.  Features of infant sounds: the first eight weeks of life , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels , 1962 .

[4]  Mary Louise Edwards,et al.  Perception and production in child phonology: the testing of four hypotheses , 1974, Journal of Child Language.

[5]  Keren Rice,et al.  Segment structure and coronal underspecification , 1989, Phonology.

[6]  James Pankhurst,et al.  Learnability and second languages : a book of readings , 1990 .

[7]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals , 1981, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[8]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[9]  Suzanne Flynn,et al.  Age-dependent Effects in Language Acquuisition: An Evaluation of “Critical Period” Hypotheses , 1991 .

[10]  J. Werker,et al.  Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  G. L. Piggott,et al.  Variability in feature dependency: The case of nasality , 1992 .

[12]  O. K. Garnica.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHONEMIC SPEECH PERCEPTION1 , 1973 .

[13]  Daniel Finer,et al.  Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax , 1991 .

[14]  Alan Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology : constraint interaction and satisfaction , 1993 .

[15]  Linda Polka,et al.  Developmental changes in speech perception: new challenges and new directions , 1993 .

[16]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[17]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[18]  J S Logan,et al.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Andrew Spencer.  Eliminating the feature [lateral] , 1984 .

[20]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[21]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[22]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[23]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[24]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: Testing a proposed universal , 1989 .

[25]  J. Werker,et al.  Perceptual flexibility: maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.

[26]  L. Raphael.  Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  E. Lenneberg.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[28]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An introduction to Japanese phonology , 1987 .

[29]  Elizabeth Caroline Sagey,et al.  The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology , 1986 .

[30]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[31]  J. Archibald,et al.  Language Learnability and L2 Phonology: The Acquisition of Metrical Parameters , 1993 .

[32]  Keren Rice,et al.  Segmental complexity and the structure of inventories , 1993 .

[33]  Steven Η. Weinberger,et al.  Minimal segments in second language phonology , 1997 .

[34]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.

[35]  Lydia White,et al.  Universal Grammar and second language acquisition , 1989 .

[36]  L. Petitto,et al.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967, Neurology.

[37]  H. Goto,et al.  Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  C. Brown,et al.  The role of feature geometry in the development of phonemic contrasts , 1997 .

[39]  Barbara J. Hancin-Bhatt.  Phonological transfer in second language perception and production , 1994 .

[40]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Carole Paradis and Jean-François Prunet (eds.) (1991). The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence . ( Phonetics and Phonology 2 ). San Diego: Academic Press. Pp. xvii + 231. , 1992, Phonology.

[41]  R. Jakobson.  Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals , 1980 .

[42]  John Archibald,et al.  Language Learnability and L2 Phonology , 1993 .

[43]  Junko Ito,et al.  Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics , 1989 .

[44]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  A. Liberman,et al.  An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English , 1975 .

[46]  W. Strange,et al.  The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception , 1982, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[47]  Eugene J. BRIbRE.  AN INVESTIGATION OF PHONOLOGICAL INTERFERENCE , 1966 .

[48]  Gloria J. Borden,et al.  Production and Perception of the /r/ - /l/ Contrast in Korean Adults Learning English. , 1983 .

[49]  S. P. Corder.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS , 1967 .