What is the effect of electronic clinical handovers on patient outcomes? A systematic review

Handover between physicians is a high-risk event for communication errors. Using electronic handover platforms has potential to improve the quality of informational transfer and therefore minimise this risk. This systematic review sought to compare the effectiveness of electronic handover methods on patient outcomes. Articles were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMbase, Scopus and CINAHL databases. Studies involving electronic handover between two healthcare personnel or teams, and which described patientspecific outcomes, were included. This search yielded 390 articles, with a total of nine publications included in the analysis. Outcomes reported in studies included length of stay, adverse event rates, time to procedure and handover completeness. This review suggests that e-handover may improve the handover completeness; however, it is unclear at this time if that translates to an improvement in patient care. The lack of reliable evidence highlights the need for further research exploring the effect of e-handovers on patient care.

[1]  David McD Taylor,et al.  Handover in the emergency department: Deficiencies and adverse effects , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[2]  Gregory W Albers,et al.  Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[3]  Claudia R Campbell,et al.  A comparison of hospital adverse events identified by three widely used detection methods. , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[4]  Morris Gordon,et al.  Educational interventions to improve handover in health care: a systematic review , 2011, Medical education.

[5]  H. Al-Jahdali,et al.  Physicians' Attitudes Toward Reporting Medical Errors-An Observational Study at a General Hospital in Saudi Arabia , 2011, Journal of patient safety.

[6]  Lee Ann Riesenberg,et al.  Systematic Review of Handoff Mnemonics Literature , 2009, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[7]  D. Bodurka,et al.  Implementation of a standardized electronic tool improves compliance, accuracy, and efficiency of trainee‐to‐trainee patient care handoffs after complex general surgical oncology procedures , 2017, Surgery.

[8]  Andrew A. White,et al.  Transparency When Things Go Wrong: Physician Attitudes About Reporting Medical Errors to Patients, Peers, and Institutions , 2017, Journal of patient safety.

[9]  Laura A. Petersen,et al.  Measuring errors and adverse events in health care , 2003, Journal of general internal medicine.

[10]  Leora I. Horwitz,et al.  Electronic handoff instruments: a truly multidisciplinary tool? , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[11]  Carl Fernandes,et al.  Electronic software significantly improves quality of handover in a London teaching hospital , 2009, Health Informatics J..

[12]  K. Walshe.  Adverse events in health care: issues in measurement , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[13]  Fuh-Yuan Shih,et al.  Electronic Referral System for Transferred Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2015 .

[14]  L. Sanchez,et al.  Efficiency of electronic signout for ED-to-inpatient admission at a non-teaching hospital , 2018, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[15]  B. Watson,et al.  Perspectives of clinical handover processes: a multi-site survey across different health professionals. , 2016, Journal of clinical nursing.

[16]  Linthorst Ge,et al.  What contributes to internists' willingness to disclose medical errors? , 2012 .

[17]  F. Haddad,et al.  Development of electronic software for the management of trauma patients on the orthopaedic unit. , 2009, Injury.

[18]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[19]  W. Aronson,et al.  Building a medical neighborhood in the safety net: an innovative technology improves hematuria workups. , 2013, Urology.

[20]  Shih-Chiang Hung,et al.  Comparing the Outcomes of Reporting and Trigger Tool Methods to Capture Adverse Events in the Emergency Department , 2017, Journal of patient safety.

[21]  Yulong Gu,et al.  Electronic referrals: What matters to the users , 2012, HIC.

[22]  I H Wilson,et al.  Surgical safety checklists: do they improve outcomes? , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[23]  H. Nazar,et al.  New transfer of care initiative of electronic referral from hospital to community pharmacy in England: a formative service evaluation , 2016, BMJ Open.

[24]  K. Conlon,et al.  Impact of a new electronic handover system in surgery. , 2011, International journal of surgery.

[25]  R. Conroy,et al.  Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes. , 2015, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[26]  R. Liston,et al.  Implementing an electronic clinical handover system in a university teaching hospital , 2018, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[27]  Lee Ann Riesenberg,et al.  Systematic Review of Handoff Mnemonics Literature * , 2019, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[28]  D. Challis,et al.  An electronic referral system supporting integrated hospital discharge , 2017 .

[29]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[30]  T. Manser.  Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[31]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  J. de Haes,et al.  What contributes to internists' willingness to disclose medical errors? , 2012, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[33]  Steven H. Woolf,et al.  A String of Mistakes: The Importance of Cascade Analysis in Describing, Counting, and Preventing Medical Errors , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[34]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Daryl R. Cheng,et al.  Impact of an integrated electronic handover tool on pediatric junior medical staff (JMS) handover , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[36]  T. Friede,et al.  Impact of treatment delay on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting with and without haemodynamic instability: results from the German prospective, multicentre FITT-STEMI trial , 2018, European heart journal.

[37]  P. Middleton,et al.  Design and trial of a new ambulance-to-emergency department handover protocol: ‘IMIST-AMBO’ , 2012, BMJ quality & safety.

[38]  Y. Wong,et al.  Implementing electronic handover: interventions to improve efficiency, safety and sustainability. , 2016, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[39]  B. Gersh,et al.  The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies: The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2009 .