Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer

Abstract In the current dynamic and virtuous flow of knowledge economy, firms are concern about whether to manage innovation centrally or through decentralized business units. Two needs emerge 1. Guaranteeing organizational efficiency and 2. Exploiting effectively market opportunity. This usually implies the integration of knowledge in technology transfer which can be accrued via the knowledge sharing between parties. However, by looking into the technological and social change literature, previous studies were mainly focused on macro-foundation of technology transfer and organizational innovative capabilities with less consideration to the role of psychological precursors of collaborations. Due to this gap, we intended to build a consistent conceptual basis for collaborations and technology transfer practices at the micro level. Therefore, drawing on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) we propose a micro-foundation model for collaborative innovation and technology transfer. To test our theoretical arguments, we use data collected from the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) dataset. Hypotheses are tested through both Anova and linear regression analyses. Findings show positive and linear relationships either between our perceived control factors and the intention between technology transfer and intentions.

[1]  Martin Natter,et al.  Understanding a firm's openness decisions in innovation , 2012 .

[2]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  J. Lee,et al.  Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore , 2004 .

[4]  C. Cooper,et al.  A Sociocultural Perspective on Knowledge Transfer in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2016 .

[5]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[6]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[7]  B. Drayton,et al.  A New Alliance for Global Change , 2010 .

[8]  R. Ryan,et al.  Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1982 .

[9]  Elkin Olaguer Pérez Sánchez,et al.  Measurement of potential absorption capacity in Colombia's innovative companies , 2017 .

[10]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[11]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[12]  J. Henkel Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[13]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[14]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory‐Building Study of Regional Co‐Opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models , 2018 .

[16]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective invention during the British , 2004 .

[17]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers , 2011 .

[18]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[19]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Knowledge-driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes. An explorative view on small to medium enterprises , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[20]  Robert G. Hawkins,et al.  Technology transfer and economic development , 1981 .

[21]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[22]  Suliman Al-Hawamdeh,et al.  Factors Impacting Knowledge Sharing , 2002, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag..

[23]  N. Boer,et al.  Knowledge Sharing within Organizations , 2005 .

[24]  R. Allen,et al.  Collective Invention , 1982 .

[25]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[26]  Melita Nicotra,et al.  Entrepreneurial performance of principal investigators and country culture: relations and influences , 2017 .

[27]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  Managing the intellectual capital within government-university-industry R&D partnerships : A framework for the engineering research centers , 2014 .

[28]  Maimunah Ismail,et al.  Fostering knowledge sharing behaviour among public sector managers: a proposed model for the Malaysian public service , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  P. Pisano,et al.  Technology Resilience and the S.T.O.R.M. Factory , 2018, Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management.

[30]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[31]  P. McGowan,et al.  Technology Nascent Entrepreneur Experiences of Start-up Competition Participation , 2017 .

[32]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[33]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving , 2007 .

[34]  Alan Murray,et al.  Do entrepreneurial knowledge and innovative attitude overcome "imperfections" in the innovation process? Insights from SMEs in the UK and Italy , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[35]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[36]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[37]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory , 2015 .

[38]  Paul O’Reilly,et al.  What factors inhibit publicly funded principal investigators’ commercialization activities? , 2017 .

[39]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Core entrepreneurial competencies and their interdependencies: insights from a study of Irish and Iranian entrepreneurs, university students and academics , 2017 .

[40]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[41]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[42]  Rob Horne,et al.  Statistical guidelines for studies of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour , 2000 .

[43]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[44]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  An exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence context , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[46]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Shifting Wealth II in Chinese economy. The effect of the horizontal technology spillover for SMEs for international growth , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[47]  John Qi Dong,et al.  Information Technology and External Search in the Open Innovation Age : New Findings from Germany , 2017 .

[48]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[49]  F. Cooke,et al.  Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the banking industry in China , 2019 .

[50]  R. Caves,et al.  Research and Transfer of Technology by Multinational Enterprises , 2009 .

[51]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  Knowledge sharing and exchange of information within bank and firm networks: the role of the intangibles on the access to credit , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[52]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  A framework for government support mechanisms aimed at enhancing university technology transfer: the Norwegian case , 2012 .

[53]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[54]  D. Sarpong,et al.  A comparative study of appropriateness and mechanisms of hard and soft technologies transfer , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[55]  P. Estabrooks,et al.  Exploring the theory of planned behavior to explain sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. , 2012, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[56]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[58]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[59]  Antonio Usai,et al.  Equity crowdfunding in technology transfer strategies and licensing , 2018, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[60]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development , 2003 .

[61]  Andrea L. Larson Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[62]  Teresa García-Marco,et al.  Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2001 .

[63]  M. Seitanidi,et al.  Collaborative Value Creation , 2012 .

[64]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[65]  H. Chesbrough Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[66]  E. Huizingh Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[67]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  Effects of cultural difference on technology transfer projects: an empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing companies , 2001 .

[68]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Choosing Governance Modes for External Technology Sourcing , 2006 .

[69]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[70]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[71]  S. Debowski Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[72]  Sotirios Paroutis,et al.  Why good things don’t happen : the micro-foundations of routines in the M&A process , 2015 .

[73]  James E. Austin,et al.  Collaborative Value Creation , 2012 .

[74]  J. Katz,et al.  Domestic technological innovations and dynamic comparative advantage: Further reflections on a comparative case-study program , 1984 .

[75]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects , 2002 .

[76]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[77]  E. Autio,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth , 2004 .

[78]  U. Lichtenthaler Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[79]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[80]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[81]  Tammy L. Madsen,et al.  Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure , 2012 .

[82]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan , 2006 .

[83]  J. Allen,et al.  Narrative in the Study of Resilience , 2006, The Psychoanalytic study of the child.

[84]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Emerging perspectives on business process management (BPM): IT-based processes and ambidextrous organizations, theory and practice , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[85]  Spyros Arvanitis,et al.  Absorptive capacity, exporting activities, innovation openness and innovation performance: A SEM approach towards a unifying framework , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[86]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation Teams , 2010 .

[87]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. , 1992 .

[88]  R. Verganti,et al.  Open innovation process to inbound knowledge: Collaboration with universities in four leading firms , 2009 .

[89]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  Object-Generated Content and Knowledge Sharing: the Forthcoming Impact of the Internet of Things , 2016 .

[90]  Kristel Miller,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of University Technology Transfer from a Quadruple Helix Perspective: Toward a Research Agenda , 2018 .

[91]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices , 2017 .

[92]  Petronella C. de Weerd-Nederhof,et al.  Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development , 2003 .

[93]  H. Ernst,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: The Role of Technology Aggressiveness , 2009 .

[94]  Jens Mueller,et al.  Improving innovation performance through knowledge acquisition: the moderating role of employee retention and human resource management practices , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[95]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[96]  M. Dawood,et al.  Efficacy of nucleotide related products on growth, blood chemistry, oxidative stress and growth factor gene expression of juvenile red sea bream, Pagrus major , 2016 .

[97]  João Ferreira,et al.  Strategic knowledge management: theory, practice and future challenges , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[98]  Josune Sáenz,et al.  Knowledge sharing and innovation performance , 2009 .

[99]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance , 2005 .

[100]  Rhonda Phillips,et al.  Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? , 2002 .

[101]  Shu-Chen Yang,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Social Capital, Behavioural Control, and Tacit Knowledge Sharing—a Multi-informant Design , 2022 .

[102]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Social networks in the R&D process: the case of the wireless communication industry around Aalborg, Denmark , 2005 .

[103]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge , 2010 .

[104]  Giselle Rampersad,et al.  The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework , 2013 .

[105]  M. Frenz,et al.  The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[106]  Roman M. Lubynsky,et al.  Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs , 2016 .

[107]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  Dual relational embeddedness and knowledge transfer in European multinational corporations and subsidiaries , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[108]  E. Carayannis,et al.  The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation , 2012 .

[109]  P. M. Wognum,et al.  Balanced relationships: management of client-supplier relationships in product development , 1999 .

[110]  D. Teece Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[111]  Yann Truong,et al.  Microfoundations of Innovative Capabilities: The Leverage of Collaborative Technologies on Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management in a Multinational Corporation , 2015 .

[112]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[113]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[114]  I. Barreto Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2010 .

[115]  Jens Leker,et al.  Open and closed innovation - different innovation cultures for different strategies , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[116]  Claude Marcotte,et al.  Technology Transfer to China The Issues of Knowledge and Learning , 2000 .

[117]  Franciane Paz Hochleitner,et al.  Inbound open innovation in SMEs: indicators, non-financial outcomes and entry-timing , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[118]  A. Ferraris,et al.  The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[119]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[120]  Hsiu-Fen Lin Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study , 2007 .

[121]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Determinants of Graduates' Start‐Ups Creation across a Multi‐Campus Entrepreneurial University: The Case of Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education*∗ , 2018 .

[122]  Ekaterina Albats,et al.  A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators , 2018 .

[123]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey , 2018 .

[124]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[125]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size , 2018 .

[126]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[127]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[128]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework , 2018 .

[129]  Z. Torres,et al.  Fortalecimiento de los procesos de gestión del conocimiento en los grupos de investigación de los departamentos de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Estudio de caso: Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica , 2020 .

[130]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[131]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[132]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions , 2002 .

[133]  S. Paruchuri,et al.  Microfoundations of Firm R&D Capabilities: A Study of Inventor Networks in a Merger , 2012 .

[134]  Frances Stewart Technology and underdevelopment , 1977 .

[135]  K. Courneya,et al.  Understanding readiness for regular physical activity in older individuals: an application of the theory of planned behavior. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[136]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries , 2015 .

[137]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments , 2001 .

[138]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  The performance implications of leveraging internal innovation through social media networks: An empirical verification of the smart fashion industry , 2017 .

[139]  Humbert Lesca,et al.  Intrinsic motivation for knowledge sharing - competitive intelligence process in a telecom company , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[140]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[141]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[142]  E. Knudsen Fundamental components of attention. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.