Ecosystem services in spatial planning and strategic environmental assessment—A European and Portuguese profile

Despite the growing interest on ecosystem services (ES) in research, significant knowledge gaps on ES integration in decision making subsist. Particularly, ES-focused profiles of governance frameworks for different policy areas, like spatial planning, are scarce. The goal of this research is to draw a profile on ES integration in the European policy and guidance framework for spatial planning and strategic environmental assessment (SEA). To investigate how this framework might be translated in a particular country of the EU and across different levels of governance, the Portuguese spatial planning and SEA framework is also analysed. To achieve these goals, a content analysis of policy and guidance documents was conducted. We have found a general low level of explicit ES integration, but some notions associated with ES are present in the documents, although more indirectly. Results highlight the potential role of SEA for ES integration. However, in the Portuguese context, the contribution of SEA in practice is currently limited and for the coming years ES will not be specifically targeted or integrated in regional spatial planning practice. Recent changes in the wider European governance framework contribute to potentially higher degrees of ES integration in the future. Nevertheless, bottom-up demand for improved ES integration in plans and policies will be an important driver. Our approach contributes to identify which policies, plans and guiding documents need improved ES integration.

[1]  H. Keune,et al.  Editorial – Editorial for Ecosystem Services—Global Issues, Local Practices , 2013 .

[2]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[3]  A. Faludi.  A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’ , 2009 .

[4]  D. Stead,et al.  European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning , 2008 .

[5]  W. Westman.  How Much Are Nature's Services Worth? , 1977, Science.

[6]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Ecosystem services in environmental assessment — Help or hindrance? , 2013 .

[7]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[8]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development , 2002 .

[9]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[10]  Jörn Birkmann,et al.  Measuring Sustainable Spatial Planning in Germany: Indicator-based Monitoring at the Regional Level , 2003 .

[11]  P. V. Beukering,et al.  Valuation of ecosystem services and strategic environmental assessment - Lessons from influential cases , 2008 .

[12]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[13]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[14]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[15]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[16]  D. Haase,et al.  Integration of ecosystem services in spatial planning: a survey on regional planners’ views , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  J. Hauck,et al.  What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  Thomas Bauler,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Belgian Environmental Policy Making: Expectations and Challenges Linked to the Conceptualization and Valuation of Ecosystem Services , 2013 .

[19]  B. Matzdorf,et al.  The relevance of the ecosystem services framework for developed countries’ environmental policies: A comparative case study of the US and EU , 2014 .

[20]  J. Ruhl.  Ecosystem Services and the Clean Water Act: Strategies for Fitting New Science into Old Laws , 2010 .

[21]  S. Lavorel,et al.  The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. , 2011, Comptes rendus biologies.

[22]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[23]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[24]  I. Liekens,et al.  Valuation of ES , 2013 .

[25]  Martina Artmann,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation , 2014, AMBIO.

[26]  Malgorzata A. Dereniowska,et al.  Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: Do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance? , 2013 .

[27]  D. D. Groot.  Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making , 1992, Polar Record.

[28]  Eea.  Protected areas in Europe:an overview , 2012 .

[29]  Anne Larigauderie,et al.  The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Science-Policy Interface , 2011, Science.

[30]  N. Harris,et al.  Introduction: regional development and spatial planning in an enlarged European Union , 2006 .

[31]  Jordi Honey-Rosés,et al.  A demand driven research agenda for ecosystem services , 2013 .

[32]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[33]  Martin Volk,et al.  Pimp Your Landscape: A Tool for Qualitative Evaluation of the Effects of Regional Planning Measures on Ecosystem Services , 2010, Environmental management.

[34]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy , 2012 .

[35]  James Aronson,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  N. Harris,et al.  Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union , 2006 .

[38]  Luís Miguel Nunes,et al.  Developing an integrated approach for the strategic monitoring of regional spatial plans , 2012 .

[39]  A. Báldi,et al.  Accurate accounting: How to balance ecosystem services and disservices , 2014 .

[40]  B. Burkhard,et al.  The Promise of the Ecosystem Services Concept for Planning and Decision-Making , 2013 .

[41]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[42]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1 , 2011 .

[43]  M. Partidário,et al.  Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment , 2013 .

[44]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species , 1981 .

[45]  D. Lang,et al.  Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability , 2014 .

[46]  R. Costanza,et al.  Ecosystem services - Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences , 2010 .

[47]  Marie Hanusch,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art , 2012 .

[48]  A. D. R. Pires,et al.  The fragile foundations of european spatial planning in Portugal , 2005 .

[49]  Christopher L. Lant,et al.  The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services , 2007 .

[50]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[51]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[52]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[53]  J. W. Termorshuizen,et al.  Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  C. Görg,et al.  Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives , 2013 .

[55]  K. Esler,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem services in development planning: perspectives from a landscape level , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[56]  H. Setälä.  Ecosystem services and biodiversity in Europe , 2009 .

[57]  Christina von Haaren,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies , 2011 .

[58]  Bruno Marcos,et al.  Can we infer about ecosystem services from EIA and SEA practice? A framework for analysis and examples from Portugal , 2013 .

[59]  J. Spangenberg.  Ecosystem Services in a Societal Context , 2014 .

[60]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy , 2013 .

[61]  Tarja Söderman,et al.  Biodiversity in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of municipal spatial plans in Finland , 2010 .

[62]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[63]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[64]  A. Faludi.  Centenary paper: European spatial planning: past, present and future , 2010 .

[65]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning , 2011 .

[66]  O. Bastian,et al.  Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example , 2012 .