The efficiency of fMRI region of interest analysis methods for detecting group differences

BACKGROUND Using a standard space brain template is an efficient way of determining region-of-interest (ROI) boundaries for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data analyses. However, ROIs based on landmarks on subject-specific (i.e., native space) brain surfaces are anatomically accurate and probably best reflect the regional blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response for the individual. Unfortunately, accurate native space ROIs are often time-intensive to delineate even when using automated methods. NEW METHOD We compared analyses of group differences when using standard versus native space ROIs using both volume and surface-based analyses. Collegiate and military-veteran participants completed a button press task and a digit-symbol verification task during fMRI acquisition. Data were analyzed within ROIs representing left and right motor and prefrontal cortices, in native and standard space. Volume and surface-based analysis results were also compared using both functional (i.e., percent signal change) and structural (i.e., voxel or node count) approaches. RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) Results suggest that transformation into standard space can affect the outcome of structural and functional analyses (inflating/minimizing differences, based on cortical geography), and these transformations can affect conclusions regarding group differences with volumetric data. CONCLUSIONS Caution is advised when applying standard space ROIs to volumetric fMRI data. However, volumetric analyses show group differences and are appropriate in circumstances when time is limited. Surface-based analyses using functional ROIs generated the greatest group differences and were less susceptible to differences between native and standard space. We conclude that surface-based analyses are preferable with adequate time and computing resources.

[1]  J. Brewer,et al.  Default network correlations analyzed on native surfaces , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Bart Rypma,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Age-Related Slowing: The ΔCBF/ΔCMRO2 Ratio Mediates Age-Differences in BOLD Signal and Human Performance , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  B. Rypma,et al.  Factors controlling neural activity during delayed-response task performance: Testing a memory organization hypothesis of prefrontal function , 2006, Neuroscience.

[4]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Grégory Operto,et al.  Projection of fMRI data onto the cortical surface using anatomically-informed convolution kernels , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  Brenna Argall,et al.  SUMA: an interface for surface-based intra- and inter-subject analysis with AFNI , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[7]  R. Haley,et al.  Central Executive Dysfunction and Deferred Prefrontal Processing in Veterans With Gulf War Illness , 2014, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  Richard B. Buxton,et al.  Regional differences in the coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism changes in response to activation: Implications for BOLD-fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  B. Biswal,et al.  Calibrating BOLD fMRI activations with neurovascular and anatomical constraints. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Windows on the brain: the emerging role of atlases and databases in neuroscience , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  Cortical Folding Patterns and Predicting Cytoarchitecture , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  An empirical comparison of surface-based and volume-based group studies in neuroimaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  Daniel Y. Kimberg,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive efficiency , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Age-related differences in regional brain volumes: A comparison of optimized voxel-based morphometry to manual volumetry , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  Martijn P. van den Heuvel,et al.  The parcellation-based connectome: Limitations and extensions , 2013, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[18]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Application of Information Technology: An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Ziad S Saad,et al.  The spatial extent of the BOLD response , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  Andrew Faulkner,et al.  Vividness of Visual Imagery and Incidental Recall of Verbal Cues, When Phenomenological Availability Reflects Long-Term Memory Accessibility , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[23]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Dissociating Age-related Changes in Cognitive Strategy and Neural Efficiency Using Event- related fMRI , 2005, Cortex.

[24]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[26]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Windows on the brain: the emerging role of atlases and databases in neuroscience , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Bart Rypma,et al.  A BOLD Perspective on Age-Related Neurometabolic-Flow Coupling and Neural Efficiency Changes in Human Visual Cortex , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[30]  Korbinian Brodmann,et al.  Brodmann's localization in the cerebral cortex : the principles of comparative localisation in the cerebral cortex based on cytoarchitectonics , 2006 .

[31]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  An approach for parcellating human cortical areas using resting-state correlations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[33]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[34]  N. Makris,et al.  Gyri of the human neocortex: an MRI-based analysis of volume and variance. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  James B. Brewer,et al.  Stability of resting fMRI interregional correlations analyzed in subject-native space: A one-year longitudinal study in healthy adults and premanifest Huntington's disease , 2012, NeuroImage.