Temporal trends in event rates after Q-wave myocardial infarction: the Framingham Heart Study.

BACKGROUND Short-term (<30 day) mortality after Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) has declined over the decades, but it is unclear if rates of long-term sequelae after Q-wave MI have improved. METHODS AND RESULTS In 546 Framingham Heart Study subjects (388 men with a mean age of 60 years; 158 women with a mean age of 69 years) with an initial recognized Q-wave MI from 1950 through 1989, we investigated time trends in risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) death (n=199), all-cause mortality (n=287), reinfarction (n=108), and congestive heart failure (CHF; n=121). With 1950 through 1969 as the reference period, hazards ratios (HRs) for these outcomes were determined for the 1970s and 1980s. Trend analyses across the 3 time periods were performed for each outcome. Compared with the 1950 through 1969 reference period, the HRs for CHD death were lower in subsequent decades (1970 through 1979: HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.98; 1980 through 1989: HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.72). All-cause mortality also declined (1970 through 1979: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.0.52 to 0.94; 1980 through 1989: HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.81). There were no significant temporal changes in the risks for recurrent MI or CHF. CONCLUSIONS Substantial reductions in risk of CHD death and all-cause mortality occurred over these 4 decades, coincident with improvements in post-MI therapies. The absence of a decline in CHF incidence may be due to improved post-MI survival of individuals with depressed left ventricular systolic function who are at high risk for CHF.

[1]  W. Kannel,et al.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. , 1979, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Mortality after first myocardial infarction. Search for a secular trend. , 1982 .

[3]  A. Folsom,et al.  Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in mortality due to coronary heart disease, 1987 to 1994. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Szklo,et al.  Time trends in prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction: a population-based study. , 1979, The Johns Hopkins medical journal.

[5]  G. Burke,et al.  Secular trends in Q wave and non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction. The Minnesota Heart Survey. , 1991, Circulation.

[6]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[7]  T. Dawber,et al.  Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. , 1951, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[8]  L. Goldman,et al.  The recent decline in mortality from coronary heart disease, 1980-1990. The effect of secular trends in risk factors and treatment. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  J. Alpert,et al.  Incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975-1984): the Worcester Heart Attack Study. , 1988, American heart journal.

[10]  M. Stern The recent decline in ischemic heart disease mortality. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Age-related trends in short- and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction: a 20-year population-based perspective (1975-1995). , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  A. Folsom,et al.  Improvement in long-term survival among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1980. The Minnesota Heart Survey. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  X. Vidal,et al.  Trends of prescribing patterns for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction over a 13-year period , 1998, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[14]  W. Kannel,et al.  Contributions of the Framingham Study to the conquest of coronary artery disease. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  P. Allhoff,et al.  The Framingham Offspring Study , 1991 .

[16]  J. Guralnik,et al.  The decline in ischemic heart disease mortality: prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  W. Dassen,et al.  Did prognosis after acute myocardial infarction change during the past 30 years? A meta-analysis. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  J. Ryu,et al.  Changes in pharmacologic treatment of hyperlipidemia. , 1989, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  A. Folsom,et al.  Recent trends in acute coronary heart disease--mortality, morbidity, medical care, and risk factors. The Minnesota Heart Survey Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  W. Kannel,et al.  The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  E. Braunwald Shattuck lecture--cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  W. Kannel,et al.  AN APPROACH TO LONGITUDINAL STUDIES IN A COMMUNITY: THE FRAMINGHAM STUDY , 1963, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  W. Kannel,et al.  Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  E. Cook,et al.  The decline in ischemic heart disease mortality rates. An analysis of the comparative effects of medical interventions and changes in lifestyle. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[25]  J. C. Christiansen,et al.  Determinants of sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1990, Circulation.

[26]  R. Califf,et al.  Trends in physician management of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1987. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  A. Folsom,et al.  Trends in CHD mortality, morbidity and risk factor levels from 1960 to 1986: the Minnesota Heart Survey. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.