Unpacking the Dynamics of Ecologies of Routines: Mediators and Their Generative Effects in Routine Interactions

Building on an in-depth ethnographic study at a renowned research laboratory, we show how the interactions of organizational routines can be more or less generative by tracing and analyzing how human and nonhuman actors (actants) connect routines. Adopting a performative perspective, we compare the connecting of such actants and study how they are engaged in routine performances. We relate observed differences in the generativity of routine interactions to whether actants become mediators or intermediaries. Whereas intermediaries merely maintain connections between routines, mediators can modify them when performing routine connections. We identify three generative effects mediators can lead to: (1) the creation of innovative outcomes, (2) the adaptation of existing routine performances, and/or (3) the emergence of new routine performances. Similar to the conception of organizational routines as dynamic and generative systems, we show that the way actants operate through their engagement renders routine interactions and thus ecologies of routines more or less generative.

[1]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[2]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Heather Wiltse.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, edited by Paul M. Leonardi, Bonnie A. Nardi, and Jannis Kallinikos. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. 365 pp. $45.00 paper. ISBN 9780199664061 (paper). , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Carlo Salvato,et al.  Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Davide Nicolini.  Medical Innovation as a Process of Translation: A Case from the Field of Telemedicine , 2010 .

[7]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Routines as Process: Past, Present, and Future , 2016 .

[8]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[9]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research , 1996 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[11]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[12]  James G. March,et al.  Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights , 2008 .

[13]  B. Latour.  On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications, Plus More Than a Few Complications , 2017 .

[14]  K. Pavitt.  Innovating routines in the business firm: what corporate tasks should they be accomplishing? , 2002 .

[15]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[16]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Consuelo Vásquez,et al.  Materiality and Organizing , 2017 .

[18]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[19]  Markus C. Becker.  Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[20]  Tammy L. Madsen,et al.  Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure , 2012 .

[21]  Christina Goulding,et al.  Grounded theory , 2015 .

[22]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[23]  Richard R. Behringer,et al.  CREating breakthroughs , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  T. Schatzki.  Where the Action Is (On Large Social Phenomena Such as Sociotechnical Regimes) , 2011 .

[25]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[26]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  Material Culture and the Dance of Agency , 2010 .

[27]  Davide Nicolini.  Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction , 2013 .

[28]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[29]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Linking Routines to Operations Capabilities: A New Perspective , 2008 .

[30]  Luciana D'Adderio,et al.  The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routines Transfer , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[31]  David Obstfeld,et al.  Creative Projects: A Less Routine Approach Toward Getting New Things Done , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[32]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[33]  高橋 進.  サイアート, マーチの「A Behavioral Theory of the Firm」 , 1995 .

[34]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Innovation Routines: Exploring the Role of Procedures and Stable Behaviour Patterns in Innovation , 2009 .

[35]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[36]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors , 2006 .

[37]  E. Hippel,et al.  Creating Breakthroughs at 3 M by , 1999 .

[38]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[39]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[41]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model , 2012 .

[42]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville.  The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Bruno Latour,et al.  THE KEY TO SUCCESS IN INNOVATION PART I: THE ART OF INTERESSEMENT , 2002 .

[44]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives , 2011 .

[45]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[46]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[47]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[48]  K. Mäkelä,et al.  Determinants of Strategic HR Capabilities in MNC Subsidiaries , 2012 .

[49]  M. Feldman.  A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[50]  B. Latour.  On Technical Mediation , 1994 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[52]  Davide Nicolini.  Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections , 2009 .

[53]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[54]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[55]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[56]  Luciana D'Adderio.  Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[57]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Mindlessness of Organizational Behaviors , 1988 .

[59]  Scott F. Turner,et al.  A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Luciana D'Adderio.  The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics , 2008 .

[61]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[62]  Chris Harty,et al.  Implementing innovation: designers, users and actor-networks , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[63]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[64]  L. Munari.  How the body shapes the way we think — a new view of intelligence , 2009 .

[65]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[66]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[67]  Claus Rerup,et al.  Beyond Collective Entities: Multilevel Research on Organizational Routines and Capabilities , 2011 .

[68]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[69]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .