The nature of phoneme representation in spoken word recognition.

Four experiments used the psychological refractory period logic to examine whether integration of multiple sources of phonemic information has a decisional locus. All experiments made use of a dual-task paradigm in which participants made forced-choice color categorization (Task 1) and phoneme categorization (Task 2) decisions at varying stimulus onset asynchronies. In Experiment 1, Task 2 difficulty was manipulated using words containing matching or mismatching coarticulatory cues to the final consonant. The results showed that difficulty and onset asynchrony combined in an underadditive way, suggesting that the phonemic mismatch was resolved prior to a central decisional bottleneck. Similar results were found in Experiment 2 using nonwords. In Experiment 3, the manipulation of task difficulty involved lexical status, which once again revealed an underadditive pattern of response times. Finally, Experiment 4 compared this prebottleneck variable with a decisional variable: response key bias. The latter showed an additive pattern of responses. The experiments show that resolution of phonemic ambiguity can take advantage of cognitive slack time at short asynchronies, indicating that phonemic integration takes place at a relatively early stage of spoken word recognition.

[1]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition , 1998 .

[2]  H. Pashler,et al.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  A G Samuel,et al.  An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Monitoring sentence comprehension , 1979 .

[5]  M. Turvey,et al.  Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords , 1976 .

[6]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[7]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[8]  G W Humphreys,et al.  The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: one manipulation or two? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[10]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  L A Streeter,et al.  The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Tom Whitehouse,et al.  Toward an Experimental Timing Standards Lab: Benchmarking precision in the real world , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Flow of information in the spoken word recognition system , 2003, Speech Commun..

[15]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[16]  Louis ten Bosch,et al.  How Should a Speech Recognizer Work? , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Continuity and gradedness in speech processing , 2003 .

[19]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[21]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[22]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  M. Gareth Gaskell,et al.  Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming , 2007, Cognition.

[24]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .

[25]  Derek Besner,et al.  Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[27]  Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987 .

[28]  M. Pitt,et al.  Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation , 2003 .

[29]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  James M. McQueen,et al.  The ghost of Christmas future: Didn't Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus and Aslin (2003) , 2003 .

[31]  M. Gaskell Modeling lexical effects on phonetic categorization and semantic effects on word recognition , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[33]  Johannes C. Ziegler,et al.  Speech and spelling interaction: the interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition , 2007 .

[34]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .

[35]  C M Connine,et al.  Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  D. Navon,et al.  Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[38]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[39]  S. Luck Sources of Dual-Task Interference: Evidence From Human Electrophysiology , 1998 .

[40]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? , 2004, Cognition.

[41]  H Pashler,et al.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  J. Démonet,et al.  Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[43]  Paul Bertelson,et al.  The emergence of phonological awareness : Comparative approaches , 1991 .

[44]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  G. P. van Galen,et al.  Speech control and single channelness , 1976 .

[47]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Lexical Effects on Speech Perception: Computational and Behavioral Experiments , 2006 .

[48]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[49]  A. Samuel The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[51]  J. Morais,et al.  Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults , 2005, Cognition.

[52]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .

[53]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .

[54]  Régine Kolinsky,et al.  Perception and awareness in phonological processing: the case of the phoneme , 1994, Cognition.

[55]  D. Whalen Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  M. Sigman,et al.  Parsing a Cognitive Task: A Characterization of the Mind's Bottleneck , 2005, PLoS biology.

[57]  J. McQueen The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  H Pashler,et al.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[60]  R Sun,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2006 .

[61]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  W. Cooper,et al.  Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. , 1980 .

[63]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[64]  R. Fox Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1994 .

[65]  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996 .

[66]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[68]  R. Remington,et al.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[70]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[71]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[72]  R W Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[74]  A. Cohen,et al.  Location specificity in response selection processes for visual stimuli , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  Ted J. Strauss,et al.  jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[76]  Richard M. Warren Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback , 2000 .

[77]  C. Read,et al.  The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing , 1986, Cognition.

[78]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[79]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.