The nature of phoneme representation in spoken word recognition.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Philip T Quinlan | Alexandra A. Cleland | Jakke Tamminen | Alexandra A Cleland | A. A. Cleland | M. Gaskell | P. Quinlan | J. Tamminen | M Gareth Gaskell | M. Gareth Gaskell | Philip T. Quinlan
[1] J. Ziegler,et al. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition , 1998 .
[2] H. Pashler,et al. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[3] A G Samuel,et al. An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Anne Cutler,et al. Monitoring sentence comprehension , 1979 .
[5] M. Turvey,et al. Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords , 1976 .
[6] Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al. Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .
[7] S. Goldinger. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.
[8] G W Humphreys,et al. The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: one manipulation or two? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9] R. H. Baayen,et al. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .
[10] S. Blumstein,et al. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.
[11] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[12] L A Streeter,et al. The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] Tom Whitehouse,et al. Toward an Experimental Timing Standards Lab: Benchmarking precision in the real world , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[14] Anne Cutler,et al. Flow of information in the spoken word recognition system , 2003, Speech Commun..
[15] D E Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.
[16] Louis ten Bosch,et al. How Should a Speech Recognizer Work? , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[17] Pierre Jolicoeur,et al. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] Anne Cutler,et al. Continuity and gradedness in speech processing , 2003 .
[19] Alexandra A. Cleland,et al. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .
[21] David E. Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .
[22] Anne Cutler,et al. Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[23] M. Gareth Gaskell,et al. Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming , 2007, Cognition.
[24] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .
[25] Derek Besner,et al. Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] Anne Pier Salverda,et al. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.
[27] Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987 .
[28] M. Pitt,et al. Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation , 2003 .
[29] W. Ganong. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[30] James M. McQueen,et al. The ghost of Christmas future: Didn't Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus and Aslin (2003) , 2003 .
[31] M. Gaskell. Modeling lexical effects on phonetic categorization and semantic effects on word recognition , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[32] Paul D. Allopenna,et al. Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .
[33] Johannes C. Ziegler,et al. Speech and spelling interaction: the interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition , 2007 .
[34] Roger W. Remington,et al. Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .
[35] C M Connine,et al. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[36] D. Navon,et al. Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[37] Carlos Gussenhoven,et al. Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .
[38] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .
[39] S. Luck. Sources of Dual-Task Interference: Evidence From Human Electrophysiology , 1998 .
[40] M. Coltheart,et al. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? , 2004, Cognition.
[41] H Pashler,et al. Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[42] J. Démonet,et al. Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[43] Paul Bertelson,et al. The emergence of phonological awareness : Comparative approaches , 1991 .
[44] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[45] D Norris,et al. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[46] G. P. van Galen,et al. Speech control and single channelness , 1976 .
[47] Lori L. Holt,et al. Attentional Modulation of Lexical Effects on Speech Perception: Computational and Behavioral Experiments , 2006 .
[48] R. M. Warren. Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.
[49] A. Samuel. The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[50] W Marslen-Wilson,et al. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.
[51] J. Morais,et al. Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults , 2005, Cognition.
[52] Anne Cutler,et al. Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .
[53] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .
[54] Régine Kolinsky,et al. Perception and awareness in phonological processing: the case of the phoneme , 1994, Cognition.
[55] D. Whalen. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] M. Sigman,et al. Parsing a Cognitive Task: A Characterization of the Mind's Bottleneck , 2005, PLoS biology.
[57] J. McQueen. The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[58] H Pashler,et al. Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[59] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.
[60] R Sun,et al. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2006 .
[61] Lori L. Holt,et al. Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[62] W. Cooper,et al. Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. , 1980 .
[63] James S. Magnuson,et al. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past , 2003, Cogn. Sci..
[64] R. Fox. Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1994 .
[65] Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996 .
[66] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[67] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[68] R. Remington,et al. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[69] H. Pashler. The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .
[70] R. Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .
[71] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .
[72] R W Remington,et al. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] D. Norris. Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.
[74] A. Cohen,et al. Location specificity in response selection processes for visual stimuli , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[75] Ted J. Strauss,et al. jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[76] Richard M. Warren. Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback , 2000 .
[77] C. Read,et al. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing , 1986, Cognition.
[78] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[79] J. C. Johnston,et al. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.