A Performance Review of Number Entry Interfaces

Number entry is ubiquitous and there are several ways a number entry interface can be designed. Until recently, research has been focused mainly on one type of number entry interface: the numeric keypad. Various factors such as the range of values, and the space available for the design allows for several alternative interfaces to be used for number entry. In the design of medical devices such as those used for controlled drug delivery, accurate and timely entry of numbers are required in order to reduce any risk of harm to patients. This paper reviews five number entry interface styles and reports the result of an experiment conducted to evaluate the performance differences of the interfaces based on numbers used in infusion therapy in a hospital. The result shows a significant effect of interface style on speed and accuracy.

[1]  Allen Newell,et al.  The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems , 1980, CACM.

[2]  C. Doherty,et al.  Tenfold Medication Errors: 5 Years’ Experience at a University-Affiliated Pediatric Hospital , 2012, Pediatrics.

[3]  Patrick Oladimeji,et al.  Towards safer number entry in interactive medical systems , 2012, EICS '12.

[4]  Duncan P. Brumby,et al.  Designing for the task: what numbers are really used in hospitals? , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[5]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[6]  Karl W. Menninger,et al.  Number Words and Number Symbols: A Cultural History of Numbers , 1971 .

[7]  Jean Vanderdonckt,et al.  Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems , 2010 .

[8]  Harold Thimbleby,et al.  Reducing number entry errors: solving a widespread, serious problem , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  Number Entry Interfaces and Their Effects on Error Detection , 2011, INTERACT.

[10]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  User interface model discovery: towards a generic approach , 2010, EICS '10.

[11]  Martin Schedlbauer.  Effects of Key Size and Spacing on the Completion Time and Accuracy of Input Tasks on Soft Keypads Using Trackball and Touch Input , 2007 .

[12]  R. L. Deininger.  Human factors engineering studies of the design and use of pushbutton telephone sets , 1960 .

[13]  A J Hull,et al.  The preferred layout for numeral data-entry keysets. , 1968, Ergonomics.

[14]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  A taxonomy of number entry error , 2011, BCS HCI.

[15]  Timothy S Lesar,et al.  Tenfold Medication Dose Prescribing Errors , 2002, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[16]  R G Marteniuk,et al.  Are there task specific performance effects for differently configured numeric keypads? , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  J. Westbrook,et al.  Errors in the administration of intravenous medications in hospital and the role of correct procedures and nurse experience , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[18]  David W Bates,et al.  Intravenous Medication Safety and Smart Infusion Systems: Lessons Learned and Future Opportunities , 2005, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[19]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Programming errors contribute to death from patient-controlled analgesia: case report and estimate of probability , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[20]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  Safer "5-key" number entry user interfaces using differential formal analysis , 2012, BCS HCI.

[21]  Marco Winckler,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2011 - 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, September 5-9, 2011, Proceedings, Part III , 2011, INTERACT.