A Time-Varying Causality Formalism Based on the Liang–Kleeman Information Flow for Analyzing Directed Interactions in Nonstationary Climate Systems

The interaction between the land surface and the atmosphere is of significant importance in the climate system because it is a key driver of the exchanges of energy and water. Several important relations to heat waves, floods, and droughts exist that are based on the interaction of soil moisture and, for instance, air temperature and humidity. Our ability to separate the elements of this coupling, identify the exact locations where they are strongest, and quantify their strengths is, therefore, of paramount importance to their predictability. A recent rigorous causality formalism based on the Liang–Kleeman (LK) information flow theory has been shown, both theoretically and in real-world applications, to have the necessary asymmetry to infer the directionality and magnitude within geophysical interactions. However, the formalism assumes stationarity in time, whereas the interactions within the land surface and atmosphere are generally nonstationary; furthermore, it requires a sufficiently long time series to ensure statistical sufficiency. In this study, we remedy this difficulty by using the square root Kalman filter to estimate the causality based on the LK formalism to derive a time-varying form. Results show that the new formalism has similar properties compared to its time-invariant form. It is shown that it is also able to capture the time-varying causality structure within soil moisture–air temperature coupling. An advantage is that it does not require very long time series to make an accurate estimation. Applying a wavelet transform to the results also reveals the full range of temporal scales of the interactions.

[1]  David Fuertes Roncero,et al.  A study of QR decomposition and Kalman filter implementations , 2014 .

[2]  Taikan Oki,et al.  GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part II: Analysis , 2006, Journal of Hydrometeorology.

[3]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality , 2008, NeuroImage.

[4]  L. Brocca,et al.  Potential of soil moisture observations in flood modelling : estimating initial conditions and correcting rainfall , 2014 .

[5]  G. Salvucci,et al.  Empirical evidence of contrasting soil moisture–precipitation feedbacks across the United States , 2016, Science.

[6]  R. Myneni,et al.  Observationally based analysis of land–atmosphere coupling , 2015 .

[7]  R.A.M. de Jeu,et al.  Soil moisture‐temperature coupling: A multiscale observational analysis , 2012 .

[8]  W. Collins,et al.  Evaluation of climate models , 2013 .

[9]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation , 2004, Science.

[10]  C. Taylor,et al.  Afternoon rain more likely over drier soils , 2012, Nature.

[11]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  GLACE: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment , 2018 .

[12]  D. Niyogi,et al.  Impacts of land–atmosphere coupling on regional rainfall and convection , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[13]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  The Attribution of Land-Atmosphere Interactions on the Seasonal Predictability of Drought , 2015 .

[14]  Bhaswati Goswami,et al.  Two novel costs for determining the tuning parameters of the Kalman Filter , 2011, 1110.3895.

[15]  Jingyong Zhang,et al.  The relationship between spring soil moisture and summer hot extremes over North China , 2015, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.

[16]  Milan Palus,et al.  Cross-Scale Interactions and Information Transfer , 2014, Entropy.

[17]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  Stochastic climate models , Part I 1 Application to sea-surface temperature anomalies and thermocline variability , 2010 .

[18]  J. Bellantoni,et al.  A square root formulation of the Kalman- Schmidt filter. , 1967 .

[19]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[20]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Bump time-frequency toolbox: a toolbox for time-frequency oscillatory bursts extraction in electrophysiological signals , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[21]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Impact of Soil Moisture–Atmosphere Interactions on Surface Temperature Distribution , 2013 .

[22]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  A new autocovariance least-squares method for estimating noise covariances , 2006, Autom..

[23]  Vinay A. Bavdekar,et al.  Identification of process and measurement noise covariance for state and parameter estimation using extended Kalman filter , 2011 .

[24]  X San Liang,et al.  Information flow within stochastic dynamical systems. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Silvo Dajčman,et al.  Interdependence Between Some Major European Stock Markets - A Wavelet Lead/Lag Analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Michael Notaro,et al.  Statistical identification of global hot spots in soil moisture feedbacks among IPCC AR4 models , 2008 .

[27]  Sophie Bastin,et al.  Soil moisture-temperature feedbacks at meso-scale during summer heat waves over Western Europe , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[28]  X. San Liang,et al.  The Liang-Kleeman Information Flow: Theory and Applications , 2013, Entropy.

[29]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Wavelet correlations to reveal multiscale coupling in geophysical systems , 2015, 1502.05255.

[30]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  Detecting Causality in Non-stationary Time Series Using Partial Symbolic Transfer Entropy: Evidence in Financial Data , 2016 .

[31]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[32]  Sten Bay Jørgensen,et al.  A Generalized Autocovariance Least-Squares Method for Kalman Filter Tuning , 2008 .

[33]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Statistical Analyses of Land–Atmosphere Feedbacks and Their Possible Pitfalls , 2010 .

[34]  Diego Macias,et al.  On the causal structure between CO2 and global temperature , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Fuqing Zhang,et al.  Review of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 2016 .

[36]  Daniel Fiifi Tawia Hagan,et al.  The Evaluation of Single-Sensor Surface Soil Moisture Anomalies over the Mainland of the People's Republic of China , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[37]  Ping Feng,et al.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of droughts in Luanhe River basin, China , 2018, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[38]  W. Wagner,et al.  Integration of Satellite Soil Moisture and Rainfall Observations over the Italian Territory , 2015 .

[39]  Willem Waegeman,et al.  A non-linear Granger-causality framework to investigate climate–vegetation dynamics , 2016 .

[40]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[41]  Seid H. Pourtakdoust,et al.  UD Covariance Factorization for Unscented Kalman Filter using Sequential Measurements Update , 2007 .

[42]  M. Hughes,et al.  Performance Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[43]  Jeremy S. Pal,et al.  Role of Soil Moisture Feedback in the Development of Extreme Summer Drought and Flood in the United States , 2016 .

[44]  Eric Darve,et al.  Real-time data assimilation for large-scale systems: The spectral Kalman filter , 2015 .

[45]  Wei‐Chyung Wang,et al.  Assessing land-atmosphere coupling using soil moisture from the Global Land Data Assimilation System and observational precipitation , 2008 .

[46]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A Review on Land Surface Processes Modelling over Complex Terrain , 2015 .

[47]  D. Lawrence,et al.  GLACE: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview , 2006 .

[48]  Diego G. Miralles,et al.  Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and atmospheric heat accumulation , 2014 .

[49]  A. Rapp,et al.  Soil moisture–precipitation coupling: observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet and underlying physical mechanisms , 2015 .

[50]  Gerald Bierman,et al.  Numerical comparison of discrete Kalman filter algorithms: Orbit Determination case study , 1976, 1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[51]  V. A. Sastry Decomposition of the extended Kalman filter , 1971 .

[52]  Time-Varying Coefficient Models And The Kalman Filter : Applications To Hedge Funds , 2013 .

[53]  J. Tribbia,et al.  The Coupled Manifold , 2005 .

[54]  X. Liang,et al.  Unraveling the cause-effect relation between time series. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[55]  E. Fischer,et al.  Soil Moisture–Atmosphere Interactions during the 2003 European Summer Heat Wave , 2007 .

[56]  Maryam Kiani,et al.  Adaptive Square-Root Cubature–Quadrature Kalman Particle Filter for satellite attitude determination using vector observations , 2014 .

[57]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[58]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[59]  Chao Zhang,et al.  A New Adaptive Square-Root Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear Systems with Additive Noise , 2015 .

[60]  X. Liang,et al.  Information flow and causality as rigorous notions ab initio. , 2015, Physical review. E.

[61]  Christophe Alexandre,et al.  Performance Analysis of Modified Gram-Schmidt Cholesky Implementation on 16 bits-DSP-chip , 2013 .

[62]  K. Hlavácková-Schindler,et al.  Causality detection based on information-theoretic approaches in time series analysis , 2007 .

[63]  M. Ananthasayanam,et al.  Introduction to the Kalman Filter and Tuning its Statistics for Near Optimal Estimates and Cramer Rao Bound , 2015, 1503.04313.

[64]  D. Fraser,et al.  The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters , 1969 .