Quantitative Assessment of the Magnitude, Impact and Spatial Extent of Ultrasonic Clutter

Clutter is a noise artifact in ultrasound images that appears as diffuse echoes overlying signals of interest. It is most easily observed in anechoic or hypoechoic regions, such as in cysts, blood vessels, amniotic fluid, and urine-filled bladders. Clutter often obscures targets of interest and complicates anatomical measurements. An analytical expression that characterizes the extent to which clutter degrades lesion contrast was derived and compared to the measured contrast loss due to clutter in a bladder phantom. Simulation and phantom studies were performed to determine ideal and achievable signal-to-clutter ratios. In vivo clutter magnitudes were quantified in simultaneously-acquired fundamental and harmonic bladder images from five volunteers. Clutter magnitudes ranged from −30 dB to 0 dB, relative to the mean signal of the bladder wall. For this range of clutter magnitudes, the analytical expression predicts a contrast loss of 0–45 dB for lesions with clutter-free contrasts of 6–48 dB. A pixel-wise comparison of simultaneously-acquired fundamental and harmonic bladder images from each volunteer revealed an overall signal reduction in harmonic images, with average reductions ranging from 11–18 dB in the bladder interior and 9–11 dB in the tissue surrounding the bladder. Harmonic imaging did not reduce clutter in all volunteers.

[1]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[2]  V F Humphrey,et al.  The development of harmonic distortion in pulsed finite-amplitude ultrasound passing through liver. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  R. Entrekin,et al.  Real Time Spatial Compound Imaging in breast ultrasound: Technology and early clinical experience , 2000 .

[4]  Carlo Bartolozzi,et al.  Tissue harmonic and contrast-specific imaging: back to gray scale in ultrasound , 2002, European Radiology.

[5]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  3D Wiener Filtering to Reduce Reverberations in Ultrasound Image Sequences , 2003, SCIA.

[6]  M. Averkiou,et al.  Tissue harmonic imaging , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[7]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Prediction of nonlinear acoustic effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities. , 1980, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[9]  J. Walkup,et al.  Statistical optics , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[10]  J D Thomas,et al.  Tissue harmonic imaging: why does it work? , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  J. Thijssen,et al.  Performance testing of medical ultrasound equipment: fundamental vs. harmonic mode. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[12]  R. Lang,et al.  Use of harmonic imaging without echocardiographic contrast to improve two-dimensional image quality. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  F. Duck Nonlinear acoustics in diagnostic ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  T. D. Mast,et al.  The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part I. Measurements. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  S. Huber,et al.  Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Obesity in Adults,et al.  Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity , 2021, Obesity Prevention and Treatment.

[17]  K. Kristoffersen,et al.  Clutter filter design for ultrasound color flow imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  L Pourcelot,et al.  Clinical use of ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  Robert C. Waag,et al.  Effects of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[20]  R. Shapiro,et al.  Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  A. C. Baker,et al.  Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical ultrasound. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  Solange Akselrod,et al.  Stationary clutter rejection in echocardiography. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  Francesco Viola,et al.  Time-Domain Optimized Near-Field Estimator for Ultrasound Imaging: Initial Development and Results , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  G E Trahey,et al.  In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  X. Gong,et al.  Improvement of tissue harmonic imaging using the pulse-inversion technique. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).