Effects of Non-Compulsory and Mandatory COVID-19 Interventions on Travel Distance and Time Away from Home: The Case of Norway in 2021 (preprint)

Background: Due to the societal, economic, and health costs of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), it is important to assess their effects. Human mobility serves as a surrogate for human contacts and compliance to NPIs. In Nordic countries, NPIs have mostly been advised and sometimes made mandatory. It is unclear if making NPIs mandatory further reduced mobility. Aim: We investigated the effect of non-compulsory and follow-up mandatory measures in major cities and rural regions on human mobility in Norway. We identified NPI categories that most affected mobility. Methods: We used mobile phone mobility data from the largest Norwegian operator. We analysed non-compulsory and mandatory measures with before-after and synthetic difference-in-differences approaches. By regression, we investigated the impact of different NPIs on mobility. Results: Nationally and in less populated regions, follow-up mandatory measures further decreased time, but not distance travelled. In urban areas, however, follow-up mandates also decreased distance, and the effect exceeded that of initial non-compulsory measures. Stricter metre rules, gyms closing and reopening, restrictions on guests in homes, and face mask recommendations most impacted distance travelled. Time travelled was most affected by gyms closing and restaurants and shops reopening. Conclusion: Overall, non-compulsory measures appeared to decrease distance travelled from home, while mandates further decreased this metric in urban areas. Time travelled is reduced more by mandates than by non-compulsory measures for all regions and interventions. Stricter distancing and restricted number of guests were associated with decreases in mobility.

[1]  S. Iacus,et al.  Compliance with restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: Does political partisanship influence behavioural responses? , 2022, ArXiv.

[2]  R. Hart,et al.  Reopening schools in a context of low COVID-19 contagion: consequences for teachers, students and their parents , 2022, Journal of Population Economics.

[3]  L. Hemkens,et al.  Randomized trials on non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a scoping review , 2022, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

[4]  M. Tully,et al.  The effect of different COVID-19 public health restrictions on mobility: A systematic review , 2021, PloS one.

[5]  S. Georganas,et al.  COVID-19: Early evening curfews and mobility , 2021, Social Science & Medicine.

[6]  J. Proctor,et al.  Insights into population behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic from cell phone mobility data and manifold learning , 2021, Nature Computational Science.

[7]  I. S. Saunes,et al.  Nordic responses to Covid-19: Governance and policy measures in the early phases of the pandemic , 2021, Health Policy.

[8]  A. Cook,et al.  Urban-Rural Disparities for COVID-19: Evidence from 10 Countries and Areas in the Western Pacific , 2021, Health data science.

[9]  Alberto Hernando,et al.  Radius of Gyration as predictor of COVID-19 deaths trend with three-weeks offset , 2021, medRxiv.

[10]  S. Stranges,et al.  A comparison of COVID-19 epidemiological indicators in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland , 2021, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[11]  Y. Teh,et al.  Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19 , 2020, Science.

[12]  P. Bajardi,et al.  Socio-economic determinants of mobility responses during the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy: from provinces to neighbourhoods , 2020, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[13]  Richard JB Dobson,et al.  Measuring the effect of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) on mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic using global mobility data , 2020, npj Digital Medicine.

[14]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Country-wide Mobility Changes Observed Using Mobile Phone Data During COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[15]  Michael R. Springborn,et al.  Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Anonymised and aggregated crowd level mobility data from mobile phones suggests that initial compliance with COVID-19 social distancing interventions was high and geographically consistent across the UK , 2020, Wellcome open research.

[17]  N. Fujiwara,et al.  Non-compulsory measures sufficiently reduced human mobility in Tokyo during the COVID-19 epidemic , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[18]  David A. Hirshberg,et al.  Synthetic Difference in Differences , 2018, 1812.09970.

[19]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  On the Use of Human Mobility Proxies for Modeling Epidemics , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[21]  Caroline O. Buckee,et al.  The impact of biases in mobile phone ownership on estimates of human mobility , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  Julia E. Aledort,et al.  Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base , 2007, BMC public health.

[23]  Thomas V Inglesby,et al.  Disease mitigation measures in the control of pandemic influenza. , 2006, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[24]  P. Horby,et al.  Nonpharmaceutical Interventions for Pandemic Influenza, National and Community Measures , 2006, Emerging infectious diseases.

[25]  Thomas P. Jenkin,et al.  The Office of the Prime Minister , 1955 .

[26]  H. Skirbekk,et al.  How trust was maintained in Scandinavia through the first crisis of modernity , 2021 .

[27]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[28]  P. Haddawy,et al.  Effects of COVID-19 government travel restrictions on mobility in a rural border area of Northern Thailand: A mobile phone tracking study. , 2021, PloS one.