Reference condition approach to restoration planning

Ecosystem restoration planningrequires quantitative rigor toevaluatealternatives,defineend states, report progress and perform environmental benefits analysis (EBA). Unfortunately, existing planning frameworks are, at best, semi-quantitative. In this paper, we: (1) describe a quantitative restoration planning approach based on a comprehensive, but simple mathematical framework that can be used to effectively apply knowledge and evaluate alternatives, (2) use the approach to derive a simple but precisely defined lexicon based on the reference condition concept and allied terms and (3) illustrate the approach with an example from the Upper Mississippi River System (UMRS) using hydrologic indicators. The approach supports the development of a scaleable restoration strategy that, in theory, can be expanded to ecosystem characteristics such as hydraulics, geomorphology, habitat and biodiversity. We identify three reference condition types, best achievable condition (ABAC), measured magnitude (MMi which can be determined at one or many times and places) and desired future condition (ADFC) that, when used with the mathematical framework, provide a complete system of accounts useful for goal-oriented system-level management and restoration. Published in 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Joseph L. Ebersole,et al.  A Resource in Crisis: Changing the Measure of Salmon Management , 1997 .

[2]  Lester L. Yuan,et al.  Striving for consistency in a national assessment: the challenges of applying a reference-condition approach at a continental scale , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[4]  M. Palmer,et al.  River restoration: OPINION , 2005 .

[5]  Rebecca S. Soileau,et al.  Environmental objectives planning workshops , 2003 .

[6]  J. Chick,et al.  Invasive Carp in the Mississippi River Basin , 2001, Science.

[7]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[8]  A. S. Halls,et al.  River fisheries: ecological basis for management and conservation , 2004 .

[9]  Brian S. Ickes,et al.  Spatial Structure and Temporal Variation of Fish Communities in the Upper Mississippi River System , 2005 .

[10]  Kenneth S. Lubinski,et al.  Upper Mississippi River - Illinois waterway system navigation feasibility study: Environmental science panel report , 2003 .

[11]  Matt R. Whiles,et al.  Biological Responses to Contrasting Hydrology in Backwaters of Upper Mississippi River Navigation Pool 25 , 2008, Environmental management.

[12]  S. Postel,et al.  Rivers for Life: Managing Water For People And Nature , 2003 .

[13]  L. Silveira,et al.  Multivariate analysis in hydrology: the factor correspondence analysis method applied to annual rainfall data , 1997 .

[14]  C. Stern.  CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN , 1950 .

[15]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[16]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  PREDICTABILITY, CONSTANCY, AND CONTINGENCY OF PERIODIC PHENOMENA' , 1974 .

[17]  Richard E. Sparks,et al.  Need for Ecosystem Management of Large Rivers and Their Floodplains These phenomenally productive ecosystems produce fish and wildlife and preserve species , 1995 .

[18]  C. Frissell,et al.  Stream and Watershed Restoration , 1998 .

[19]  Larry J. Weber,et al.  Contrasting the Middle Paraná and Mississippi Rivers to develop a template for restoring large floodplain river ecosystems , 2007 .

[20]  Nicholas Pinter,et al.  Hydrologic history of the Mississippi and Lower Missouri Rivers based upon a refined specific‐gauge approach , 2008 .

[21]  R. Gregory,et al.  Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  J C Ogden,et al.  Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Yao Yin,et al.  Naturalization of the flood regime in regulated rivers the case of the upper Mississippi River , 1998 .

[25]  L. Schulte,et al.  Narrowing Historical Uncertainty: Probabilistic Classification of Ambiguously Identified TreeSpecies in Historical ForestSurvey Data , 2002, Ecosystems.

[26]  George H. Stankey,et al.  Adaptive Management and the Northwest Forest Plan: Rhetoric and Reality , 2003 .

[27]  J. Karr.  Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[28]  Scott B. Franklin,et al.  HYDROLOGIC STAGE PERIODICITY OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BEFORE AND AFTER SYSTEMATIC CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS 1 , 2003 .

[29]  Richard Sylvan.  Mucking with Nature , 1998 .

[30]  Brian Richter,et al.  A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network , 1998 .

[31]  John M. Nestler,et al.  River stage response to alteration of Upper Mississippi River channels, floodplains, and watersheds , 2010, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[33]  Charles A. Simenstad,et al.  When is restoration not?: Incorporating landscape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration , 2006 .

[34]  Ann Burruss.  Coastal wetland restoration , 2009, Wetlands.

[35]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[36]  Thomas Leschine,et al.  An Evaluation of the Influence of Natural Science in Regional-Scale Restoration Projects , 2006, Environmental management.

[37]  Joseph L. Ebersole,et al.  FORUM: Restoration of Stream Habitats in the Western United States: Restoration as Reexpression of Habitat Capacity , 1997, Environmental management.

[38]  Charles H. Theiling,et al.  Water Level Management Opportunities for Ecosystem Restoration on the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway , 2004 .

[39]  R. Clark,et al.  Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. , 2005 .

[40]  M. Greenacre.  Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .

[41]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[42]  David L. Galat,et al.  Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River , 2000 .