Group decision support systems and incentive structures

Many studies have compared the advantages and disadvantages of meetings using Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS), but relatively little research has been conducted on the role of incentives in these meetings. An experiment was conducted with 40 eight-person groups to determine the influence of incentive distribution mode (group or individual) and incentive type (positive or negative) on GDSS outcomes. Results indicate that group performance, including task performance, consensus, process satisfaction, and participation, is higher if there are group-based incentives, and that negative incentives or extinction result in more participation and less satisfaction. No interaction effects were found between incentive distribution mode and incentive type.

[1]  J. Singer,et al.  Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity , 1965 .

[2]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Systems: Evidence from a Low Structure Environment , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[4]  M. Patterson,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior: A Functional Perspective. , 1984 .

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[6]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[7]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[9]  Anthony F. Buono,et al.  A Primer on Organizational Behavior , 1985 .

[10]  Robert T. Moran Managing Cultural Differences , 1979 .

[11]  Thomas J. Knutson An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus , 1972 .

[12]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[13]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  Group decision‐making as a structurational process , 1985 .

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[16]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Allan R. Cohen,et al.  Effective Behavior in Organizations: Cases, Concepts, and Student Experiences , 1992 .

[18]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[19]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Knowledge Sharing and Negotiation Support in Multiperson Decision Support Systems , 1985, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Thomas J. Knutson,et al.  Orientation behavior, leadership and consensus: A possible functional relationship , 1975 .

[22]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  The JPEG still picture compression standard , 1991, CACM.

[25]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Behavioral Principles in the Practice of Management , 1985 .

[26]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Communication technologies and collaboration systems: Common domains, problems and solutions , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[28]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[30]  P. Bernholz,et al.  Public Choice , 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, Volume 1.

[31]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus , 1979 .

[32]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[33]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[34]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Organizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness , 1987 .

[35]  N. Hafer,et al.  Managing cultural differences. , 1986, Nursing management.

[36]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[37]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[38]  W. Wood,et al.  Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A comparison of synchronous and virtual legislative session groups faced with an idea generation task , 1997, Inf. Manag..