Digital Imaging in Cytopathology

Rapid advances are occurring in the field of cytopathology, particularly in the field of digital imaging. Today, digital images are used in a variety of settings including education (E-education), as a substitute to multiheaded sessions, multisite conferences, publications, cytopathology web pages, cytology proficiency testing, telecytology, consultation through telecytology, and automated screening of Pap test slides. The accessibility provided by digital imaging in cytopathology can improve the quality and efficiency of cytopathology services, primarily by getting the expert cytopathologist to remotely look at the slide. This improved accessibility saves time and alleviates the need to ship slides, wait for glass slides, or transport pathologists. Whole slide imaging (WSI) is a digital imaging modality that uses computerized technology to scan and convert pathology and cytology glass slides into digital images (digital slides) that can be viewed remotely on a workstation using viewing software. In spite of the many advances, challenges remain such as the expensive initial set-up costs, workflow interruption, length of time to scan whole slides, large storage size for WSI, bandwidth restrictions, undefined legal implications, professional reluctance, and lack of standardization in the imaging process.

[1]  Fred R. Dee.  Virtual microscopy in pathology education. , 2009, Human pathology.

[2]  L. Howell,et al.  Diagnostic Concordance of Telecytology and Conventional Cytology for Evaluating Breast Aspirates , 1998, Acta Cytologica.

[3]  K A Allen.  Evaluation methods for assessing cytotechnology students' screening skills , 2000, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[4]  David C Wilbur,et al.  Internet-based gynecologic telecytology with remote automated image selection: results of a first-phase developmental trial. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  Guoping Cai,et al.  Cytologic evaluation of image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies via robotic microscopy: A validation study , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[6]  David C Wilbur,et al.  A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low‐resolution images , 2005, Cancer.

[7]  David J Romer,et al.  Use of virtual microscopy for didactic live-audience presentation in anatomic pathology. , 2003, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[8]  Karen A. Allen.  Implementation of new technologies in cytotechnology education , 1998, Cancer.

[9]  H. Kitchener,et al.  Automation-assisted versus manual reading of cervical cytology (MAVARIC): a randomised controlled trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Michael C Montalto,et al.  Pathology RE-imagined: the history of digital radiology and the future of anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  David C Wilbur,et al.  Ovarian frozen section diagnosis: use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[12]  C Marsan.  Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma. , 1995, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[13]  C. Hedvat,et al.  Digital microscopy: past, present, and future. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  Rassoul Amirfattahi,et al.  An Automated Method for Segmentation of Epithelial Cervical Cells in Images of ThinPrep , 2010, Journal of Medical Systems.

[15]  B. Dziura,et al.  Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  Johannes Bernarding,et al.  Digital workflow management for quality assessment in pathology. , 2008, Pathology, research and practice.

[17]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Comparison between a traditional single still image and a multiframe video image along the z‐axis of the same microscopic field of interest in cytology: Which does contribute to telecytology? , 2009, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[18]  Gloria Bueno García,et al.  Critical Comparison of 31 Commercially Available Digital Slide Systems in Pathology , 2006, International journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  Kirk Foster,et al.  Medical education in the digital age: Digital whole slide imaging as an e-learning tool , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[20]  Y. Yagi,et al.  Histology, imaging and new diagnostic work-flows in pathology , 2008, Diagnostic pathology.

[21]  Caroline Massey,et al.  Telecytopathology for immediate evaluation of fine‐needle aspiration specimens , 2010, Cancer cytopathology.

[22]  Jimmie Stewart,et al.  Virtual microscopy for cytology proficiency testing: Are we there yet? , 2007, Cancer.

[23]  K Yamashiro,et al.  Cytodiagnosis through use of a z‐axis video by volunteer observers: a promising tool for external quality assessment , 2011, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[24]  Kristine A. Erps,et al.  Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. , 2009, Human pathology.

[25]  Alberto M Marchevsky,et al.  Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: a model using multiple digital images of Papanicolaou tests. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Implementation of virtual microscope slides in the annual pathobiology of cancer workshop laboratory. , 2003, Human pathology.

[27]  Aruna Kumari Prayaga,et al.  Telecytology – are we ready? , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[28]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Utility of 2-D and 3-D Virtual Microscopy in Cervical Cytology Education and Testing , 2007, Acta Cytologica.

[29]  Stavros K Archondakis,et al.  Telecytology: a tool for quality assessment and improvement in the evaluation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[30]  A. Jara-Lazaro,et al.  Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice , 2010, Pathology.

[31]  Carlo Petrini,et al.  Informed consent in experimentation involving mentally impaired persons: ethical issues. , 2010, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[32]  David C Wilbur,et al.  Practices of participants in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology, 2006. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[33]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System™ (TIS): experience in a high volume academic practice , 2007, CytoJournal.

[34]  Johannes Bernarding,et al.  Virtual 3D microscopy using multiplane whole slide images in diagnostic pathology. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[35]  Jimmie Stewart,et al.  Virtual microscopy: An educator's tool for the enhancement of cytotechnology students' locator skills , 2008, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[36]  John L. Bell,et al.  Clinical Integration of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems with Pathology and Hospital Information System in Oncology , 2010, The American surgeon.

[37]  A. Bondi,et al.  The virtual slide in the promotion of cytologic and hystologic quality in oncologic screenings. , 2010, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[38]  Syed Z. Ali,et al.  Application of virtual microscopy in clinical cytopathology , 2001, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[39]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Informatics applied to cytology , 2008, CytoJournal.

[40]  Mária Cserneky,et al.  Shifting gears higher - digital slides in graduate education - 4 years experience at Semmelweis University , 2010, Diagnostic pathology.

[41]  Thomas Kalinski,et al.  Virtual 3D microscopy in pathology education. , 2010, Human pathology.

[42]  Mari Mino-Kenudson,et al.  Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[43]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology , 2009, CytoJournal.

[44]  Andrew A Renshaw,et al.  Measuring sensitivity in gynecologic cytology: A review , 2002, Cancer.

[45]  Anil Parwani,et al.  Whole slide imaging for teleconsultation and clinical use , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[46]  Anil V Parwani,et al.  Residency training in pathology informatics: a virtual rotation solution. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[47]  Christel Daniel-Le Bozec,et al.  Standardizing the use of whole slide images in digital pathology , 2011, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[48]  James Duncan,et al.  Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[49]  Stephen S Raab,et al.  Patient safety in anatomic pathology: measuring discrepancy frequencies and causes. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[50]  Johannes Bernarding,et al.  Improvements in education in pathology: virtual 3D specimens. , 2009, Pathology, research and practice.

[51]  David C Wilbur,et al.  The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[52]  Bruce A Beckwith,et al.  Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[53]  A. Dawson,et al.  Clinical Experience with the ThinPrep Imager System , 2006, Acta Cytologica.

[54]  L. Pantanowitz.  Digital images and the future of digital pathology , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[55]  Anil V. Parwani,et al.  Development and use of a genitourinary pathology digital teaching set for trainee education , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[56]  In Sun Kim,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.