ESTIMATING POPULATION TREND AND PROCESS VARIATION FOR PVA IN THE PRESENCE OF SAMPLING ERROR

Time series of population abundance estimates often are the only data available for evaluating the prospects for persistence of a species of concern. With such data, it is possible to perform a population viability analysis (PVA) with diffusion approximation methods using estimates of the mean population trend and the variance of the trend, the so-called process variation. Sampling error in the data, however, may bias estimators of process variation derived by simple methods. We develop a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based method for estimating trend, process variation, and sampling error from a single time series based on a discrete-time model of density-independent growth coupled with a model of the sampling process. Transformation of the data yields a conventional linear mixed model, in which the variance components are functions of the process variation and sampling error. Simulation results show essentially unbiased estimators of trend, process variation, and sampling error over a range of process variation/sampling error combinations. Example data analyses are provided for the Whooping Crane (Grus americana), grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis), California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus), and Puerto Rican Parrot (Amazona vittata). This REML-based method is useful for PVA methods that depend on accurate estimation of process variation from time-series data.

[1]  Eli Meir,et al.  Will Observation Error and Biases Ruin the Use of Simple Extinction Models? , 2000 .

[2]  R. N. Kackar,et al.  Approximations for Standard Errors of Estimators of Fixed and Random Effects in Mixed Linear Models , 1984 .

[3]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[4]  Brian Dennis,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN TIME SERIES OBSERVATIONS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS: ESTIMATION AND TESTING' , 1994 .

[5]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Evaluating population persistence of censused and unmanaged herbivore populations from the Kruger National Park, South Africa , 1996 .

[6]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  D. Ludwig.  Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction , 1999 .

[8]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[9]  Elizabeth E. Holmes,et al.  VALIDATING POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR CORRUPTED DATA SETS , 2002 .

[10]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Estimation of Growth and Extinction Parameters for Endangered Species , 1991 .

[11]  R. C. Erickson,et al.  Whooping crane recovery plan , 1980 .

[12]  Muni S. Srivastava,et al.  Regression Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1991 .

[13]  E. E. Holmes,et al.  Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Mark L. Taper,et al.  The northern Yellowstone elk: density dependence and climatic conditions , 2002 .

[15]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Gray Whales and the Value of Monitoring Data in Implementing the U.S. Endangered Species Act , 1999 .

[16]  N. Snyder,et al.  Photographic censusing of the 1982-1983 California condor population , 1985 .