Evaluating the Usability of Educational Websites Based on Students' Preferences of Design Characteristics

This research investigated the relative importance of specific design criteria developed for the purpose of this research, in the evaluation of the usability of educational websites from the point view of students; it then evaluated the usability of nine educational websites based on students' preferences. The results showed that content and navigation were the first and second preferred design categories to be considered while evaluating the usability of educational websites, while the organisation/architecture was the least important category. Also, the results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between males and females regarding only one category: the content. Females considered this to be the most important category while males considered it as the second most important. By contrast, the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the students of the two selected faculties (the Faculty of Information Technology and Science, and the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences) concerning the relative importance of the developed criteria based on their majors/specialisations. In general, the results showed that the majority of the students were satisfied with the usability of the Jordanian university websites. Specifically, the results showed the students were satisfied with the content and navigation (ease of use) of the tested websites, but dissatisfied with the design of the websites.

[1]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two-factor model for website design and evaluation , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[4]  Ann M. Pearson,et al.  Determining the importance of key criteria in web usability , 2007 .

[5]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[6]  Toni Granollers,et al.  Testing Website Usability in Spanish-Speaking Academia through Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthroughs , 2008, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[7]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[8]  Michalis Xenos,et al.  Quality Evaluation of Educational Websites Using Heuristic and Laboratory Methods , 2008 .

[9]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Analyzing the influence of website design parameters on website usability , 2005 .

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Suleiman H. Mustafa,et al.  Usability of the Academic Websites of Jordan ' s Universities An Evaluation Study , 2008 .

[13]  Nektarios Kostaras,et al.  Assessing Educational Web-site Usability using Heuristic Evaluation Rules , 2007 .

[14]  Stephanie Rosenbaum,et al.  Usability studies of WWW sites: heuristic evaluation vs. laboratory testing , 1997, SIGDOC '97.

[15]  Michael du Toit,et al.  Evaluating the usability of an academic marketing department's website from a marketing student's perspective , 2009 .

[16]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  An Introduction to Usability , 1998 .

[17]  Ping Zhang,et al.  A Comparison of the Most Important Website Features in Different Domains: An Empirical Study of User Perceptions , 2000 .