Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate computerized neural networks to determine visual field progression in patients with glaucoma. METHODS Two hundred thirty-three series of Octopus G1 visual fields of 181 patients with glaucoma were collected. Each series was composed of 4 or more reliable visual fields from patients who had previously undergone automated perimetry. The visual fields were independently evaluated in a masked fashion by 3 experienced observers (K.N.-M, M.W., and J.C.) and were judged to show progression based on the agreement of 2 observers. The stable and progressed series were matched for mean defect at baseline. The threshold data were submitted to a back propagation neural network that was trained to classify each series as stable or progressed. Two thirds of the data were used for the training and the remaining one third to test the performance of the network. This was repeated 3 times to classify all of the series (changing the training and test series). RESULTS Fifty-nine series of visual fields showed progression and 151 were judged stable. Neural network sensitivity was 73% and specificity was 88% (threshold for progression = 0.5). The concordance of the neural network with the observers was good (0.50 < or = kappa > or = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS A neural network can be trained to recognize visual field progression in good concordance with experienced observers. Neural networks may be used to aid the physician in the evaluation of glaucomatous visual field progression.

[1]  B Petrig,et al.  Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  G E Trope,et al.  Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  C. Krakau,et al.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF THE CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD IN CHRONIC GLAUCOMA CASES , 1982, Acta ophthalmologica.

[5]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[6]  R L Yolton,et al.  Demonstration of a neural network expert system for recognition of glaucomatous visual field changes. , 1994, Military medicine.

[7]  David Keating,et al.  Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network , 1994, Eye.

[8]  D B Henson,et al.  Visual field analysis using artificial neural networks , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  L Brigatti,et al.  Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  J F Hills,et al.  Evaluation of the t test as a method of detecting visual field changes. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Identifying the measurement noise in glaucomatous testing: an artificial neural network approach , 1994, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[12]  Charles W. Butler,et al.  Naturally intelligent systems , 1990 .

[13]  R. P. Mills,et al.  A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  F. Fankhauser,et al.  Statistical Program for the Analysis of Perimetric Data , 1981 .

[15]  R A Hitchings,et al.  Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. , 1991, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  H. D. Hoskins,et al.  Confidence intervals for change in automated visual fields. , 1988, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  J Caprioli,et al.  Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  Bernard Schwartz,et al.  Trend analyses of automated visual fields , 1987 .

[19]  M H Goldbaum,et al.  Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  J. Katz,et al.  Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Richard K. Morgan,et al.  Statpac 2 glaucoma change probability. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.