Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized

The fact that action observation, motor imagery and execution are associated with partially overlapping increases in parieto-frontal areas has been interpreted as evidence for reliance of these behaviors on a common system of motor representations. However, studies that include all three conditions within a single paradigm are rare, and consequently, there is a dearth of knowledge concerning the distinct mechanisms involved in these functions. Here we report key differences in neural representations subserving observation, imagery, and synchronous imitation of a repetitive bimanual finger-tapping task using fMRI under conditions in which visual stimulation is carefully controlled. Relative to rest, observation, imagery, and synchronous imitation are all associated with widespread increases in cortical activity. Importantly, when effects of visual stimulation are properly controlled, each of these conditions is found to have its own unique neural signature. Relative to observation or imagery, synchronous imitation shows increased bilateral activity along the central sulcus (extending into precentral and postcentral gyri), in the cerebellum, supplementary motor area (SMA), parietal operculum, and several motor-related subcortical areas. No areas show greater increases for imagery vs. synchronous imitation; however, relative to synchronous imitation, observation is associated with greater increases in caudal SMA activity than synchronous imitation. Compared to observation, imagery increases activation in pre-SMA and left inferior frontal cortex, while no areas show the inverse effect. Region-of-interest (ROI) analyses reveal that areas involved in bimanual open-loop movements respond most to synchronous imitation (primary sensorimotor, classic SMA, and cerebellum), and less vigorously to imagery and observation. The differential activity between conditions suggests an alternative hierarchical model in which these behaviors all rely on partially independent mechanisms.

[1]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[2]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Sergio Bagnato,et al.  Unilateral cerebellar stroke disrupts movement preparation and motor imagery , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Page,et al.  Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  M. Jeannerod Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  S. Vogt,et al.  From visuo-motor interactions to imitation learning: Behavioural and brain imaging studies , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Premovement activity of the pre-supplementary motor area and the readiness for action: studies of time-resolved event-related functional MRI. , 2005, Human movement science.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  M. Erb,et al.  Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Scott H. Frey Forecasting the Long-range Consequences of Manual and Tool Use Actions , 2010 .

[13]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[14]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Scott H. Johnson,et al.  Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics , 2000, Neuroreport.

[18]  S. H. Johnson,et al.  Cerebral Organization of Motor Imagery: Contralateral Control of Grip Selection in Mentally Represented Prehension , 1998 .

[19]  F. Tremblay,et al.  Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[22]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  P. Dechent,et al.  Is the human primary motor cortex involved in motor imagery? , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  S. Page,et al.  Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2007, Stroke.

[26]  Magdalena Sabaté,et al.  Brain lateralization of motor imagery: motor planning asymmetry as a cause of movement lateralization , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  S. Small,et al.  Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Cortical and cerebellar activity of the human brain during imagined and executed unimanual and bimanual action sequences: a functional MRI study. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  L. Craighero,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M. Preul The Human Brain: Surface, Blood Supply, and Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy , 2001 .

[33]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  R. Passingham,et al.  Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  J. Baron,et al.  Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke? , 2006, Stroke.

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  View-Based Encoding of Actions in Mirror Neurons of Area F5 in Macaque Premotor Cortex , 2011, Current Biology.

[38]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Selective Activation of a Parietofrontal Circuit during Implicitly Imagined Prehension , 2002, NeuroImage.

[39]  R. Chris Miall,et al.  State Estimation in the Cerebellum , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[40]  Peter S. Jones,et al.  Mapping the involvement of BA 4a and 4p during Motor Imagery , 2008, NeuroImage.

[41]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Application of Information Technology: An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[42]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  The suppressive influence of SMA on M1 in motor imagery revealed by fMRI and dynamic causal modeling , 2008, NeuroImage.

[43]  Y Agid,et al.  Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements , 1995, Neuroreport.

[44]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  B. Kamousi,et al.  Classification of motor imagery tasks for brain-computer interface applications by means of two equivalent dipoles analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[46]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking , 2006, NeuroImage.

[47]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  E. Zohary,et al.  Mirror-image representation of action in the anterior parietal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[50]  Marko Wilke,et al.  Functional MRI comparison of passive and active movement: possible inhibitory role of supplementary motor area , 2009, Neuroreport.

[51]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery? , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[52]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  David N. Lee,et al.  An automatic-voluntary dissociation and mental imagery disturbance following a cerebellar lesion , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  M. Hallett,et al.  Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  J B Poline,et al.  Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  T. Mulder Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[58]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  H. Duvernoy,et al.  The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy with MRI, and Blood Supply , 1999 .

[61]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Selective responses in right inferior frontal and supramarginal gyri differentiate between observed movements of oneself vs. another , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  C. Richards,et al.  Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Stefan Geyer,et al.  Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Motor Control: Theories, Experiments, and Applications , 2010 .

[65]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence for mirror neurons in humans , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The Mental Representation of Hand Movements After Parietal Cortex Damage , 1996, Science.

[67]  Manuel Rodríguez,et al.  Disturbance of motor imagery after cerebellar stroke. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[68]  Andrew B. Templeman,et al.  Non-Linear Optimisation in Civil Engineering , 1982 .

[69]  Michael S Gazzaniga,et al.  Within grasp but out of reach: evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  M. Hallett,et al.  Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Retraction Note: Experience-dependent modulation of motor corticospinal excitability during action observation , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[72]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.