The Discourse of Peer Review

s, reviewing, 169–70 accept reviews containing criticisms, 49, 53–4, 64 content, 52–4 discourse structure (moves), 41–2 evaluative language, 124–5, 131–2 politeness, 100–1 reviewer roles, 135–6 speech acts, 76 summarizing judgements, 184 Adamson, J., 146, 147, 154 Adolphs, S., 67 Agha, A., 113 Aijmer, K., 90 American Association for Applied Linguistics, 9 anonymity blind review processes, 97, 162 double blind review processes, 9, 24, 162–3 and face-threatening acts, 97 as foil for unnecessary harshness, 162 and pragmatics of criticism, 72 research grant applications, 4 apologising, 91, 93, 96, 106, 108, 110 appraisal framework, 116 approval, expressing, 94, 100, 105–7, 111. See also positive vs. negative content of reviewers’ reports Asian EFL Journal peer reviewer training, 146–7 Index

[1]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[2]  David Y. W. Lee,et al.  Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things , 2008 .

[3]  David S. Mills,et al.  The formation of scholars: rethinking doctoral education for the twenty‐first century , 2009 .

[4]  John M. Swales,et al.  Occluded genres in the academy : The case of the submission letter , 1996 .

[5]  Diane Pecorari,et al.  Academic Writing and Plagiarism: A Linguistic Analysis , 2008 .

[6]  K. Hyland,et al.  As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation , 2008 .

[7]  James R. Marsden.  How Could My Paper Have Gotten Rejected? , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[8]  Donald E. Brown,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research: Pathway to Meaningful Publications , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[9]  S. Bourke,et al.  Investigating PhD thesis examination reports , 2004 .

[10]  David Coniam.  Exploring reviewer reactions to manuscripts submitted to academic journals , 2012 .

[11]  Hilary Nesi,et al.  Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education , 2012 .

[12]  Laura L. Aull,et al.  Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing , 2014 .

[13]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Extending the notion of ‘text’: the visual and performing arts doctoral thesis , 2013 .

[14]  LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF EVALUATIVE STANCE: FINDINGS FROM RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSIONS , 2014 .

[15]  Andrew Foley.  Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language [Book Review] , 2008 .

[16]  Marianne Celce-Murcia,et al.  Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language Teachers , 2000 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[18]  Oriol Valentín,et al.  The Pragmatics of Politeness , 2014 .

[19]  Paul R. Trowler.  Depicting and researching disciplines: strong and moderate essentialist approaches , 2014 .

[20]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Genre and the language learning classroom , 2001 .

[21]  Martin Weisser,et al.  Corpus Pragmatics: Speech act annotation , 2014 .

[22]  Academic Book Reviews in English and Spanish: Critical Comments and Rhetorical Structure , 2009 .

[23]  Negotiating publication: Author responses to Peer Review of medical research articles in thoracic surgery , 2009 .

[24]  Lynne Flowerdew.  Corpus-based discourse analysis , 2011 .

[25]  Martin Hewings.  English Language Standards in Academic Articles: Attitudes of Peer Reviewers , 2006 .

[26]  Pat Thomson,et al.  Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision , 2006 .

[27]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Methods and methodologies in second language writing research , 2016 .

[28]  D. Allison,et al.  Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions , 2003 .

[29]  K. Hyland,et al.  Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal , 2004 .

[30]  Lynne Flowerdew,et al.  A genre-inspired and lexico-grammatical approach for helping postgraduate students craft research grant proposals , 2016 .

[31]  Jan Blommaert,et al.  Discourse: A Critical Introduction.  , 2008, Linguistische Berichte (LB).

[32]  Karen Englander,et al.  Transformation of the Identities of Nonnative English-Speaking Scientists as a Consequence of the Social Construction of Revision , 2009 .

[33]  Pilar Mur Dueñas.  Getting research published internationally in English: An ethnographic account of a team of Finance Spanish scholars' struggles , 2012 .

[34]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice , 2016 .

[35]  Dániel Z. Kádár,et al.  Politeness in East Asia: Politeness and culture , 2011 .

[36]  Phuong Dzung Pho.  Authorial Stance in Research Articles: Examples from Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology , 2013 .

[37]  C. Tardy.  Current conceptions of voice , 2012 .

[38]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Publishing in Leading Journals: An Overview for Aspirant Authors Early in Their Careers , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[39]  Lynn P. Nygaard.  Publishing and perishing: an academic literacies framework for investigating research productivity , 2017 .

[40]  Mary J. Schleppegrell,et al.  Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences , 2011 .

[41]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing , 2004 .

[42]  Peter Woods,et al.  Successful Writing for Qualitative Researchers , 2022 .

[43]  Michael Haugh.  Epilogue: Culture and norms in politeness research , 2011 .

[44]  Jonathan Culpeper.  Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence , 2011 .

[45]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Thesis and Dissertation Writing , 2012 .

[46]  Joseph J. Lee,et al.  Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays , 2016 .

[47]  Jane Fielding,et al.  Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications , 2006 .

[48]  Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez,et al.  Bias and effort in peer review , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  Dale J Benos,et al.  How to review a paper. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[51]  Anthony K. P. Wensley.  Lost in Translation and Other Challenges of New and International Researchers Seeking Publication , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[52]  S. Bourke,et al.  Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners’ reports on doctoral theses , 2015 .

[53]  Mark Ware,et al.  Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community - Results from an international study , 2008, Inf. Serv. Use.

[54]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Linguistic Analysis of Grant Proposals: European Union Research Grants , 1999 .

[55]  Maurice B. Line,et al.  Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses , 2002 .

[56]  Janet Giltrow,et al.  Academic Writing: An Introduction , 2005 .

[57]  Michael Haugh.  Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research , 2012 .

[58]  T. Lillis.  The Sociolinguistics of Writing , 2013 .

[59]  Christina A. Christie.  Epilogue. Politeness research: Sociolinguistics as applied pragmatics , 2015 .

[60]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science , 2011 .

[61]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation , 2011, Language Teaching.

[62]  Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice, Ursula Wingate. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, Buffalo and Toronto (2015), vii + 194 pp., $39.95 , 2016 .

[63]  Michael Hammond,et al.  Research Methods: The Key Concepts , 2006 .

[64]  Mark Ware,et al.  Peer Review: Recent Experience and Future Directions , 2011 .

[65]  Polly Tse.  Stance in Academic Bios , 2012 .

[66]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  The History of English for Specific Purposes Research , 2012 .

[67]  Miguel F. Ruiz-Garrido,et al.  English for professional and academic purposes , 2010 .

[68]  Chris J. Park.  Redefining the doctorate. , 2007 .

[69]  Kate Cadman,et al.  Writing and Identity. The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing: Roz Ivanic. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1998. ISBN: 90 272 1798 X (Eur) /1-556 19-323-8 (US) , 2002 .

[70]  J. Yates.  The PowerPoint Presentation and Its Corollaries: How Genres Shape Communicative Action in Organizations , 2004 .

[71]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Some thoughts on English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) and related issues , 2013, Language Teaching.

[72]  Álvaro Santana Acuña.  How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2012 .

[73]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic evaluation : review genres in university settings , 2009 .

[74]  Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan,et al.  The book review genre: A structural move analysis , 2012 .

[75]  K. Maton.  Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education , 2013 .

[76]  S. Mills.  Gender and Politeness , 2003 .

[77]  Linda Bol,et al.  Publishing in high quality journals: perspectives from overworked and unpaid reviewers , 2014, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[78]  Y. Matsumoto.  Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese , 1988 .

[79]  M. Handford.  What can a corpus tell us about specialist genres , 2010 .

[80]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Discourse and practice : new tools for critical discourse analysis , 2008 .

[81]  Stephen Evans,et al.  Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study , 2012 .

[82]  John Flowerdew,et al.  English for Research Publication Purposes , 2012 .

[83]  T. Lillis.  Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing” , 2008 .

[84]  C. Coffin,et al.  LANGUAGE, REGISTER AND GENRE , 2013 .

[85]  Ulla Connor.  Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists , 2000 .

[86]  R. Spier.  The history of the peer-review process. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[87]  P. Matsuda.  Identity in Written Discourse , 2015, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[88]  K. Hyland,et al.  Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics , 2010 .

[89]  D. Cameron.  Performing gender identity: young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity (1997) , 2012 .

[90]  Pejman Habibie.  An Investigation into Writing for Scholarly Publication by Novice Scholars: Practices of Canadian Anglophone Doctoral Students , 2015 .

[91]  Louise J. Ravelli,et al.  Change and stability: Examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts , 2012 .

[92]  Trinidad Lewis.  Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach , 1996 .

[93]  Michael Haugh,et al.  The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative , 2007 .

[94]  Lisa McGrath,et al.  Writing for publication in four disciplines : Insights into text and context , 2015 .

[95]  J. Flowerdew,et al.  Author’s editor revisions to manuscripts published in international journals , 2016 .

[96]  Dennis E. Logue.  Rules for Referees , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[97]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[98]  M. Patton.  Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[99]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Genre Relations: Mapping Culture , 2008 .

[100]  Ulrike Najar.  Writing for peer reviewed journals. Strategies for getting published , 2014 .

[101]  Joan Cutting.  Pragmatics and Discourse , 2008 .

[102]  Brian Paltridge.  Genre and English for Specific Purposes , 2012 .

[103]  Marina Sbisà,et al.  Speech act theory , 2009 .

[104]  Patricia S. Mann.  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1992 .

[105]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[106]  Yan Huang.  The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics , 2012 .

[107]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bias in peer review , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[108]  John M. Swales Christine B. Feak,et al.  English in today's research world , 2000 .

[109]  U. Connor,et al.  The genre of grant proposals: A corpus linguistic analysis , 2004 .

[110]  Nicholas Groom.  Phraseology and Epistemology in Academic Book Reviews: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Two Humanities Disciplines , 2009 .

[111]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Politeness. , 1958, Medical technicians bulletin.

[112]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  The handbook of English for specific purposes , 2012 .

[113]  P. Eckert,et al.  Putting communities of practice in their place , 2007 .

[114]  M. Valor.  Advertising books: a linguistic analysis of blurbs , 2005 .

[115]  D. Machin,et al.  How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis , 2012 .

[116]  Richard Smith,et al.  Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006 .

[117]  John M. Swales,et al.  Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building , 1998 .

[118]  Paul R. Trowler.  Disciplines and Academic Practices , 2012 .

[119]  Hugh Gosden,et al.  ‘Why not give us the full story?’: functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers , 2003 .

[120]  Nigel Harwood,et al.  ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing , 2005 .

[121]  Carolyn R. Miller.  Genre as social action , 1984 .

[122]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  A Relationship between Reading and Writing: The Conversational Model. , 1980 .

[123]  Lubie Grujicic-Alatriste.  The Myths of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? , 2015 .

[124]  Susann Claffey,et al.  Genre, frames and writing in research settings , 1998 .

[125]  T. Lillis,et al.  The Politics of English, Language and Uptake: The Case of International Academic Journal Article Reviews. , 2015 .

[126]  Carlton Isaac Zak Lancaster.  Stance and Reader Positioning in Upper-Level Student Writing in Political Theory and Economics , 2012 .

[127]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English , 2005 .

[128]  Ulrich Eggers,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses Social Interactions In Academic Writing , 2016 .

[129]  Steven R. Gordon.  The Editor Is Often a Coach , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[130]  Z. Lancaster.  Exploring Valued Patterns of Stance in Upper-Level Student Writing in the Disciplines , 2014 .

[131]  Fang-Ying Yang,et al.  Uncovering published authors' text-borrowing practices: Paraphrasing strategies, sources, and self-plagiarism , 2015 .

[132]  Louise Hall,et al.  Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[133]  Historians at Work: Reporting Frameworks in English and Italian Book Review Articles , 2009 .

[134]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Projecting an academic identity in some reflective genres , 2011 .

[135]  Svenja Adolphs,et al.  Introducing Pragmatics in Use , 2011 .

[136]  Ken Hyland,et al.  The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes , 2016 .

[137]  Brian Martin.  Writing a Helpful Referee's Report , 2008 .

[138]  S. Mills.  Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness , 2011 .

[139]  Amy J. Devitt.  Genre performances: John Swales' Genre Analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies , 2015 .

[140]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Genre Analysis of Editorial Letters to International Journal Contributors , 2002 .

[141]  Jeannett Martin.  Beyond Exchange : Appraisal Systems in English , 2000 .

[142]  David Rose,et al.  Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause , 2003 .

[143]  Sachiko Ide.  Japanese sociolinguistics politeness and women's language , 1982 .

[144]  Arch G. Woodside.  Grabbing Readers: How to Focus Your Paper's Title and Contents on Its Major Theoretical Contribution Rather than the Local Context of the Study , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[145]  N. Fairclough.  Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research , 2003 .

[146]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication , 1994 .

[147]  G. Garzone,et al.  Disciplinary Identities. Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse , 2014 .

[148]  K. Hyland,et al.  Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing , 2002 .

[149]  Gino Eelen.  A critique of politeness theories , 2001 .

[150]  Nur Yigitoglu,et al.  Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English , 2012 .

[151]  Sunny Hyon,et al.  Convention and Inventiveness in an Occluded Academic Genre: A Case Study of Retention-Promotion-Tenure Reports. , 2008 .

[152]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  The Golden Rule of Reviewing , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[153]  Ralf Dresner,et al.  Rethinking Context Language As An Interactive Phenomenon , 2016 .

[154]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2002, J. Documentation.

[155]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Options of identity in academic writing , 2002 .

[156]  S. Mills,et al.  Language and Sexism: Bibliography , 2008 .

[157]  John M. Swales,et al.  Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts , 2009 .

[158]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  Second Language Writing: L1 composition theories: implications for developing theories of L2 composition , 1990 .

[159]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Corpus informed discourse analysis: the case of academic engagement , 2009 .

[160]  S. Hood,et al.  Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing , 2010 .

[161]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[162]  Jenny A. Thomas.  Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics , 1995 .

[163]  Saeko Fukushima.  In search of another understanding of politeness: From the perspective of attentiveness , 2015 .

[164]  Pejman Habibie.  Writing for Scholarly Publication in a Canadian Higher Education Context: A Case Study , 2016 .

[165]  A. Brew,et al.  Beyond tribes and territories: New metaphors for new times , 2012 .

[166]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge , 2015 .

[167]  Yi Liu,et al.  Learning to write, reading to learn: genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School , 2013 .

[168]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  Text, Role and Context: Developing Academic Literacies , 1997 .

[169]  A. P. B. Sardinha.  Corpus linguistics - investigating language structure and use , 1999 .

[170]  J. Swales.  Research Genres: Explorations and Applications , 2004 .

[171]  Sooho Song.  Politeness and Culture in Second Language Acquisition , 2012 .

[172]  Dimitra Koutsantoni,et al.  Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles , 2004 .

[173]  A. Gross,et al.  Hedging, Stance and Voice in Medical Research Articles , 2012 .

[174]  James Hartley,et al.  Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook , 2008 .

[175]  Pauline Webber,et al.  Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments , 2010 .

[176]  Vladimir Žegarac.  Developing Academic Literacies: Understanding Disciplinary Communities’ Culture and Rhetoric. Dimitra Koutsantoni (2007). Vol. 4, Contemporary Studies in Descriptive Linguistics. Oxford: Peter Lang. pp. 302 ISBN: 9783039105755 , 2010 .

[177]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse , 2005 .

[178]  W. Grabe,et al.  Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective , 1998 .

[179]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[180]  Lawrence D. Carrington,et al.  Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity , 1985 .

[181]  G. Diani.  Reporting and Evaluation in English Book Review Articles: A Cross-Disciplinary Study , 2009 .

[182]  Michael Haugh,et al.  Politeness in Japan , 2011 .

[183]  Christine M. Tardy,et al.  A Genre System View of the Funding of Academic Research , 2003 .

[184]  Deborah Cameron,et al.  `Is there any Ketchup, Vera?': Gender, Power and Pragmatics , 1998 .

[186]  Helen Basturkmen.  Back Cover Blurbs: Puff Pieces and Windows on Cultural Values , 2009 .

[187]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Well-Done Literature Reviews: A Journal's Editor--in--Chief Perspective , 2015, A Guide to Publishing for Academics.

[188]  Diane Belcher,et al.  Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world , 2007 .

[189]  Darla J. Twale.  A Faculty Guide for Succeeding in Academe , 2013 .

[190]  Betty Samraj.  Discourse structure and variation in manuscript reviews: Implications for genre categorization , 2016 .

[191]  S. Starfield.  Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning: “Why does this feel empowering?”: Thesis writing, concordancing, and the corporatizing university , 2004 .

[192]  Jerry Wellington.  Getting Published: A Guide for Lecturers and Researchers , 2003 .

[193]  Virginia Walbot.  Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts? , 2009, Journal of biology.

[194]  K. Hyland,et al.  Undergraduate understandings:Stance and voice in final year reports , 2012 .

[195]  Yes, but is it gender? , 2002 .

[196]  Irene Hames.  Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape , 2012 .

[197]  A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[198]  C. Tribble.  Corpora and corpus analysis: new windows on academic writing , 2014 .

[199]  D. Kádár,et al.  Understanding Politeness by Dániel Z. Kádár , 2013 .

[200]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. London (Allen Lane) 1967. , 1967 .

[201]  Shigeru Ehara,et al.  Reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to AJR by international authors. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[202]  John M. Swales,et al.  Navigating Academia: Writing Supporting Genres , 2011 .

[203]  Daniel E. O'Leary.  Models of Editing and Editorial Boards , 2015 .

[204]  Sandra J. Harris,et al.  Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse , 2001 .

[205]  K. Hyland,et al.  Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing , 2005 .

[206]  Sara Mills,et al.  Gender Matters: Feminist Linguistic Analysis , 2011 .

[207]  Lynne Flowerdew,et al.  An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies , 2005 .

[208]  Peichin Chang.  EFL Doctoral Students’ Conceptions of Authorial Stance in Academic Research Writing: An Exploratory Study , 2016 .

[209]  "Thank you for your critical comments and helpful suggestions": compliance and conflict in authors' replies to referees' comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers , 2001 .

[210]  P. Eckert,et al.  Language and Gender: Introduction to the study of language and gender , 2013 .

[211]  Polly Tse,et al.  Discipline and Gender: Constructing Rhetorical Identity in Book Reviews , 2009 .

[212]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions , 2014 .

[213]  Parastou Feiz,et al.  Discourse Analysis: Putting Our Worlds into Words , 2013 .

[214]  K. Hakkarainen,et al.  Doctoral students' key learning experiences in the natural sciences , 2012 .

[215]  Neil H. Johnson,et al.  Non-canonical grammar in Best Paper award winners in engineering , 2013 .

[216]  Agus Wijayanto,et al.  Politeness in Interlanguage Pragmatics of Complaints by Indonesian Learners of English. , 2013 .

[217]  Louise J. Ravelli,et al.  Doctoral writing in the visual and performing arts: two ends of a continuum , 2012 .

[218]  Lisa McGrath,et al.  Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices , 2012 .

[219]  Michael Haugh.  Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order , 2013 .

[220]  M. Kourilova,et al.  COMMUNICATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF REVIEWS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS WRITTEN BY NON-NATIVE USERS OF ENGLISH , 1998 .

[221]  D. Kádár,et al.  Politeness in China , 2011 .

[222]  J. Ziman,et al.  Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science , 1970, Medical History.

[223]  Yueguo Gu.  Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese , 1990 .

[224]  Frank Davidoff.  Improving peer review: who's responsible? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[225]  Karl Maton,et al.  Disciplinarity : functional linguistic and sociological perspectives , 2011 .

[226]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  Beyond the Text: Towards Understanding the Teaching and Learning of Genres , 1999 .

[227]  Jay Liebowitz.  A Guide to Publishing for Academics - Inside the Publish or Perish Phenomenon , 2015 .

[228]  J. Sadock.  Speech acts , 2007 .

[229]  Janet P. Moursund,et al.  Evaluation: an introduction to research design , 1973 .

[230]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[231]  J. Burnham.  The evolution of editorial peer review. , 1990, JAMA.

[232]  Douglas Biber,et al.  University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers , 2006 .

[233]  Douglas Robinson.  Introducing Performative Pragmatics , 2005 .

[234]  V. Bom.  A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data , 2018 .

[235]  Publishing from a dissertation , 2016 .

[236]  Hugh Gosden.  Research writing and NNSs: From the editors , 1992 .

[237]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[238]  John M. Swales,et al.  Creating Contexts: Writing Introductions across Genres , 2011 .

[239]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? , 2007 .

[240]  Lindy Woodrow,et al.  Writing about quantitative research in applied linguistics , 2014 .

[241]  Brian Paltridge.  Theses and Dissertations in English for Specific Purposes , 2018 .

[242]  Joy Burrough-Boenisch,et al.  Shapers of Published NNS Research Articles. , 2003 .

[243]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[244]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review , 2009 .

[245]  Becky Kwan,et al.  Facilitating novice researchers in project publishing during the doctoral years and beyond: a Hong Kong-based study , 2013 .

[246]  Genre analysis of research grant proposals , 2004 .

[247]  J. Swales.  Aspects of article introductions , 2011 .

[248]  Maggie Charles,et al.  English for Academic Purposes , 2012 .

[249]  Betty J. Birner.  Introduction to Pragmatics , 2012 .

[250]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing , 2008 .

[251]  D. Biber,et al.  Book Review: Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure by Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton , 2007, CL.