Additive partitioning of Rao's quadratic diversity: a hierarchical approach

Ecologists have long recognized three different components of species diversity: alpha or within-community diversity (α), beta or between-community diversity (β) and gamma or total species diversity in a region (γ). In this framework, β-diversity has been traditionally linked to the other diversity components through a multiplicative model so that it can be expressed as the ratio between γ-diversity and average α-diversity in a set of plots. Yet, more recently, ecologists are starting to partition diversity using the lesser known approach that α- and β-diversities sum to give the γ-diversity. This additive diversity partitioning is based on the decomposition of concave diversity measures for which the total diversity in a pooled set of communities exceeds (or equals) the average diversity within communities. In this paper, first, I shortly revise additive diversity partitioning for traditional diversity measures that are computed from species relative abundances. Next, I show that, under some specific circumstances, the same model can be extended to Rao's quadratic entropy, a measure that combines species relative abundances and pairwise interspecies differences. Finally, in the framework of taxonomic diversity, Rao's quadratic entropy has another decomposition: the sum over the Simpson indices at all the taxonomic levels. Thus, I show that, combining both partitioning models, the contribution of each level in the taxonomic hierarchy to the α- β- and γ-diversity components of Rao's quadratic entropy is made explicit. The proposed diversity decomposition is illustrated with a worked example on data from a plant community on ultramafic soils in Tuscany (central Italy).

[1]  A. Chiarucci,et al.  Effects of nutrient addition on species diversity and ground cover of “serpentine” vegetation , 1998 .

[2]  M. Ortega,et al.  Estimation of Plant Diversity at Landscape Level: A Methodological Approach Applied to Three Spanish Rural Areas , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[3]  J. Gower,et al.  Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients , 1986 .

[4]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS: TESTING MULTISPECIES RESPONSES IN MULTIFACTORIAL ECOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS , 1999 .

[5]  A. Chiarucci,et al.  Garigue plant communities of ultramafic outcrops of Tuscany (Central Italy) , 1995 .

[6]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  New \'biodiversity\' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress , 1995 .

[7]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Bridging the gap between ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity with Shannon's entropy: comment to Izsák and Papp , 2002 .

[8]  L. Mucina,et al.  Variance in species richness and guild proportionality in two contrasting dry grassland communities , 1999 .

[9]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Bayesian model-based cluster analysis for predicting macrofaunal communities , 2003 .

[10]  P. Edwards,et al.  Quantifying habitat specificity to assess the contribution of a patch to species richness at a landscape scale , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  D. Chessel,et al.  From dissimilarities among species to dissimilarities among communities: a double principal coordinate analysis. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Harry F. Recher,et al.  On the Relation between Habitat Selection and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[13]  László Papp,et al.  Application of the quadratic entropy indices for diversity studies of drosophilid assemblages , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[14]  S. Lek,et al.  Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters , 2003 .

[15]  J. M. Emlen,et al.  Quantitative characterization of the regressive ecological succession by fractal analysis of plant spatial patterns , 2003 .

[16]  R. Lewontin The Apportionment of Human Diversity , 1972 .

[17]  C. Ricotta Additive Partition of Parametric Information and Its Associated β-Diversity Measure , 2003, Acta biotheoretica.

[18]  A. Solow,et al.  On the measurement of biological diversity , 1993 .

[19]  Quadratic diversity: Its maximization can reduce the richness of species , 2002, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[20]  J. Allan Components of diversity , 1975, Oecologia.

[21]  T. O. Crist,et al.  The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea , 2002 .

[22]  K. Shimatani,et al.  On the measurement of species diversity incorporating species differences , 2001 .

[23]  Calyampudi R. Rao Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[24]  D. Chessel,et al.  Measuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics , 2002, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[25]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[26]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[27]  A. Cronquist The evolution and classification of flowering plants , 1989 .

[28]  N. Picard,et al.  Are ecological groups of species optimal for forest dynamics modelling , 2003 .

[29]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[30]  Otto Wildi,et al.  Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  R. Lande Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities , 1996 .

[32]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[33]  Aat Barendregt,et al.  Relevant variables to predict macrophyte communities in running waters , 2003 .