Effect of Local Environment and Stellar Mass on Galaxy Quenching and Morphology at 0.5 < z < 2.0
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ben Forrest | Karl Glazebrook | Henry C. Ferguson | Ray A. Lucas | Anton M. Koekemoer | Ryan F. Quadri | Norman A. Grogin | Casey Papovich | Pieter van Dokkum | Lee R. Spitler | Darren J. Croton | Avishai Dekel | Yicheng Guo | H. Ferguson | Yicheng Guo | E. Bell | N. Grogin | D. Kocevski | C. Papovich | K. Glazebrook | A. Dekel | P. Dokkum | D. Croton | K. Tran | R. Allen | A. Tomczak | I. Labb'e | R. Quadri | L. Kawinwanichakij | G. Kacprzak | L. Spitler | C. Straatman | T. Nanayakkara | Eric F. Bell | Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij | Glenn G. Kacprzak | Rebecca J. Allen | Dale D. Kocevski | Ivo Labb'e | Themiya Nanayakkara | Caroline M. S. Straatman | Kim-Vy H. Tran | Adam Tomczak | Ben Forrest | A. Koekemoer | R. Lucas | P. V. Dokkum | A. Koekemoer | R. Lucas
[1] A. Zirm,et al. RESOLVING THE DISCREPANCY OF GALAXY MERGER FRACTION MEASUREMENTS AT z ∼ 0–3 , 2014, 1410.3479.
[2] Puragra Guhathakurta,et al. The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift , 2011, 1109.5698.
[3] H. Ferguson,et al. BULGE GROWTH AND QUENCHING SINCE z = 2.5 IN CANDELS/3D-HST , 2014, 1402.0866.
[4] Strangulation as the primary mechanism for shutting down star formation in galaxies , 2015, Nature.
[5] M. Jarvis,et al. Environmental quenching and galactic conformity in the galaxy cross-correlation signal , 2016, 1606.08989.
[6] M. Rees,et al. Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters , 1977 .
[7] R. Muñoz,et al. Larger sizes of massive quiescent early-type galaxies in clusters than in the field at 0.8 < z < 1.5 , 2013, 1307.0003.
[8] R. Nichol,et al. The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105 low‐redshift galaxies , 2002, astro-ph/0205070.
[9] S. E. Persson,et al. SATELLITE QUENCHING AND GALACTIC CONFORMITY AT 0.3 < z < 2.5 , 2015, 1511.02862.
[10] R. Dav'e,et al. Hot gas in massive haloes drives both mass quenching and environment quenching , 2014, 1405.1043.
[11] Guillermo Barro,et al. Compaction and quenching of high-z galaxies in cosmological simulations: blue and red nuggets , 2014, 1412.4783.
[12] Oxford,et al. Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation , 2005, astro-ph/0511338.
[13] C. Carollo,et al. SURFACE DENSITY EFFECTS IN QUENCHING: CAUSE OR EFFECT? , 2016, 1604.06459.
[14] G. Kauffmann,et al. The accretion of gas on to galaxies as traced by their satellites , 2010, 1005.1825.
[15] J. Navarro,et al. The Origin of Star Formation Gradients in Rich Galaxy Clusters , 2000, astro-ph/0004078.
[16] M. Franx,et al. SUBMITTED TO THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 DETECTION OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES IN A BICOLOR SEQUENCE FROM Z = 0 − 2 , 2022 .
[17] Y. Birnboim,et al. Virial shocks in galactic haloes , 2003, astro-ph/0302161.
[18] M. Balogh,et al. The connection between galaxy structure and quenching efficiency , 2014, 1402.3394.
[19] B. Garilli,et al. MASS AND ENVIRONMENT AS DRIVERS OF GALAXY EVOLUTION IN SDSS AND zCOSMOS AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SCHECHTER FUNCTION , 2010, 1003.4747.
[20] D. Croton,et al. Where do ‘red and dead’ early-type void galaxies come from? , 2008, 0801.2771.
[21] Modelling the galaxy bimodality: shutdown above a critical halo mass , 2006, astro-ph/0601295.
[22] L. Kewley,et al. ZFIRE: A KECK/MOSFIRE SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF GALAXIES IN RICH ENVIRONMENTS AT z ∼ 2 , 2016, 1607.00013.
[23] E. Bell. Galaxy Bulges and their Black Holes: a Requirement for the Quenching of Star Formation , 2008, 0804.4001.
[24] J. Newman,et al. Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre , 2012, 1203.1625.
[25] A. Dressler. Galaxy morphology in rich clusters: Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies , 1980 .
[26] Masayuki Tanaka,et al. INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PROTOCLUSTER GALAXIES: ACCELERATED STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION IN OVERDENSE ENVIRONMENTS? , 2011, 1110.0327.
[27] J. Brinchmann,et al. ON THE DEARTH OF COMPACT, MASSIVE, RED SEQUENCE GALAXIES IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE , 2009, 0907.4766.
[28] T. Oosterloo,et al. A large H I cloud near the centre of the Virgo cluster , 2005, astro-ph/0505397.
[29] R. Bower,et al. Overconsumption, outflows and the quenching of satellite galaxies , 2014, 1404.6251.
[30] B. Garilli,et al. zCOSMOS 20k: satellite galaxies are the main drivers of environmental effects in the galaxy population at least to z ∼ 0.7 , 2013, 1307.4402.
[31] I. Smail,et al. The dependence of star formation activity on environment and stellar mass at z∼ 1 from the HiZELS-Hα survey , 2010, 1007.2642.
[32] A. Dekel,et al. Galaxy bimodality due to cold flows and shock heating , 2004, astro-ph/0412300.
[33] M. Blanton,et al. A STELLAR MASS THRESHOLD FOR QUENCHING OF FIELD GALAXIES , 2012, 1206.3573.
[34] A. V. D. Wel,et al. Predicting Quiescence: The Dependence of Specific Star Formation Rate on Galaxy Size and Central Density at 0.5 < z < 2.5 , 2016, 1607.03107.
[35] Garth D. Illingworth,et al. AN ULTRA-DEEP NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRUM OF A COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXY AT z = 2.2 , 2009, 0905.1692.
[36] A. Dekel,et al. Wet Disc Contraction to Galactic Blue Nuggets and Quenching to Red Nuggets , 2013, 1310.1074.
[37] B. Garilli,et al. The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: The build-up of the colour-density relation , 2006, astro-ph/0603202.
[38] A. Dekel,et al. Bursting and quenching in massive galaxies without major mergers or AGNs , 2007, astro-ph/0703435.
[39] H. Hoekstra,et al. Evidence for a change in the dominant satellite galaxy quenching mechanism at z = 1. , 2015, 1511.07344.
[40] Arizona,et al. CAUGHT IN THE ACT: THE ASSEMBLY OF MASSIVE CLUSTER GALAXIES AT z = 1.62 , 2011, 1110.3821.
[41] M. Rees,et al. Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering , 1978 .
[42] M. Blanton,et al. Physical properties and environments of nearby galaxies , 2009, 0908.3017.
[44] J. Trump,et al. Structural and Star-forming Relations since z ∼ 3: Connecting Compact Star-forming and Quiescent Galaxies , 2015, 1509.00469.
[45] C. Lidman,et al. Evidence for strong evolution in galaxy environmental quenching efficiency between z = 1.6 and z = 0.9 , 2016, 1610.08058.
[46] Chien Y. Peng,et al. STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS OF GALAXIES IN CANDELS , 2012, 1211.6954.
[47] H. Mo,et al. The importance of satellite quenching for the build-up of the red sequence of present-day galaxies , 2007, 0710.3164.
[48] J. Holtzman,et al. THE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF LOCAL GROUP DWARF GALAXIES. III. CHARACTERIZING QUENCHING IN LOW-MASS GALAXIES , 2015, 1503.05195.
[49] C. Conselice,et al. Galactic conformity and central/satellite quenching, from the satellite profiles of M* galaxies at 0.4 < z < 1.9 in the UKIDSS UDS , 2014, 1406.6058.
[50] S. E. Persson,et al. THE FOURSTAR GALAXY EVOLUTION SURVEY (ZFOURGE): ULTRAVIOLET TO FAR-INFRARED CATALOGS, MEDIUM-BANDWIDTH PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS WITH IMPROVED ACCURACY, STELLAR MASSES, AND CONFIRMATION OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES TO z ∼ 3.5 , 2016, 1608.07579.
[51] R. Nichol,et al. Quantifying the Bimodal Color-Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies , 2003, astro-ph/0309710.
[52] M. Boylan-Kolchin,et al. Under pressure: quenching star formation in low-mass satellite galaxies via stripping , 2016, 1606.07810.
[53] J. Brinkmann,et al. The environmental dependence of the relations between stellar mass, structure, star formation and nuclear activity in galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0402030.
[54] S. Faber,et al. Two conditions for galaxy quenching: compact centres and massive haloes , 2014, 1406.5372.
[55] Marc Davis,et al. Galaxy Correlations as a Function of Morphological Type , 1975 .
[56] Pin T. Ng,et al. A fast and efficient implementation of qualitatively constrained quantile smoothing splines , 2007 .
[57] R. Larson. Effects of Supernovae on the Early Evolution of Galaxies , 1974 .
[58] M. Donahue,et al. Hα Tail, Intracluster H II Regions, and Star Formation: ESO 137-001 in Abell 3627 , 2007, 0706.1220.
[59] A. Koekemoer,et al. GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.
[60] C. Slater,et al. THE MASS DEPENDENCE OF DWARF SATELLITE GALAXY QUENCHING , 2014, 1407.6006.
[61] M. Irwin,et al. The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) , 2006, astro-ph/0604426.
[62] A. Hopkins,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) : growing up in a bad neighbourhood – how do low-mass galaxies become passive? , 2015, 1511.02245.
[63] Paolo Coppi,et al. EAZY: A Fast, Public Photometric Redshift Code , 2008, 0807.1533.
[64] Marijn Franx,et al. Structure and Star Formation in Galaxies out to z = 3: Evidence for Surface Density Dependent Evolution and Upsizing , 2008, 0808.2642.
[65] P. Norberg,et al. ZENS. IV. SIMILAR MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH MASS QUENCHING AND ENVIRONMENT QUENCHING AND THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF BULGE GROWTH VERSUS THE FADING OF DISKS , 2014, 1402.1172.
[66] T. D. Matteo,et al. Modelling feedback from stars and black holes in galaxy mergers , 2004, astro-ph/0411108.
[67] C. Carollo,et al. Evolution of density profiles in high-z galaxies: compaction and quenching inside-out , 2015, 1509.00017.
[68] G. Lake,et al. The Formation of Quasars in Low-Luminosity Hosts via Galaxy Harassment , 1997, astro-ph/9701212.
[69] B. Garilli,et al. The zCOSMOS 10k-sample: the role of galaxy stellar mass in the colour-density relation up to z ~ 1 , 2010, 1007.3841.
[70] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment , 2006, astro-ph/0607648.
[71] G. Kauffmann,et al. A Re-examination of Galactic Conformity and a Comparison with Semi-analytic Models of Galaxy Formation , 2012, 1209.3306.
[72] O. Fakhouri,et al. Environmental dependence of dark matter halo growth – I. Halo merger rates , 2008, 0808.2471.
[73] P. Hopkins,et al. A semi-analytic model for the co-evolution of galaxies, black holes and active galactic nuclei , 2008, 0808.1227.
[74] Jr. Oemler Augustus. The Systematic Properties of Clusters of Galaxies. Photometry of 15 Clusters , 1974 .
[75] Kansas,et al. CANDELS OBSERVATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF CLUSTER GALAXIES AT z = 1.62 , 2011, 1110.3794.
[76] Stefano Andreon,et al. SPECTROSCOPIC CONFIRMATION OF THE RICH z = 1.80 GALAXY CLUSTER JKCS 041 USING THE WFC3 GRISM: ENVIRONMENTAL TRENDS IN THE AGES AND STRUCTURE OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2013, 1310.6754.
[77] H. Hoekstra,et al. THE GEMINI CLUSTER ASTROPHYSICS SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY (GCLASS): THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENT AND SELF-REGULATION IN GALAXY EVOLUTION AT z ∼ 1 , 2011, 1112.3655.
[78] O. I. Wong,et al. The green valley is a red herring: Galaxy Zoo reveals two evolutionary pathways towards quenching of star formation in early-and late-type galaxies , 2014, 1402.4814.
[79] J. Tinker,et al. WHAT DOES CLUSTERING TELL US ABOUT THE BUILDUP OF THE RED SEQUENCE? , 2009, 0909.1325.
[80] O. Ilbert,et al. NEWLY QUENCHED GALAXIES AS THE CAUSE FOR THE APPARENT EVOLUTION IN AVERAGE SIZE OF THE POPULATION , 2013, 1302.5115.
[81] C. Conselice,et al. Measures of Galaxy Environment I - What is "Environment"? , 2011, 1109.6328.
[82] Major-merger Galaxy Pairs in the COSMOS Field—Mass-dependent Merger Rate Evolution since z = 1 , 2012 .
[83] S. More,et al. First results on the cluster galaxy population from the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey. I. The role of group or cluster environment in star formation quenching from z = 0.2 to 1.1 , 2017, 1704.06219.
[84] J. Silk,et al. Dwarf galaxies, cold dark matter, and biased galaxy formation , 1986 .
[85] R. Davé,et al. How do galaxies get their gas , 2002, astro-ph/0407095.
[86] G. Kauffmann,et al. Environmental effects on satellite galaxies: the link between concentration, size and colour profile , 2008, 0809.2283.
[87] S. Faber,et al. A LINK BETWEEN STAR FORMATION QUENCHING AND INNER STELLAR MASS DENSITY IN SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY CENTRAL GALAXIES , 2013, 1308.5224.
[88] E. Tollerud,et al. The mass dependence of satellite quenching in Milky Way-like haloes , 2014, 1407.3276.
[89] H. Hildebrandt,et al. TRACING THE STAR-FORMATION–DENSITY RELATION TO z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1104.1426.
[90] T. Treu,et al. The Grism Lens-amplified Survey from Space (Glass). IX. The Dual Origin of Low-mass Cluster Galaxies as Revealed by New Structural Analyses , 2016, 1607.00384.
[91] Marijn Franx,et al. SIZES AND SURFACE BRIGHTNESS PROFILES OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1111.3361.
[92] G. Jogesh Babu,et al. Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy: With R Applications , 2012 .
[93] Stijn Wuyts,et al. WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 2 FROM CANDELS , 2011, 1110.3786.
[94] Durham,et al. Ram pressure stripping the hot gaseous haloes of galaxies in groups and clusters , 2007, 0710.0964.
[95] P. Norberg,et al. THE PAN-STARRS1 MEDIUM-DEEP SURVEY: THE ROLE OF GALAXY GROUP ENVIRONMENT IN THE STAR FORMATION RATE VERSUS STELLAR MASS RELATION AND QUIESCENT FRACTION OUT TO z ∼ 0.8 , 2013, 1312.4736.
[96] S. E. Persson,et al. THE SFR–M* RELATION AND EMPIRICAL STAR FORMATION HISTORIES FROM ZFOURGE AT 0.5 < z < 4 , 2015, 1510.06072.
[97] C. Conselice,et al. Evidence for a correlation between the sizes of quiescent galaxies and local environment to z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1307.3247.
[98] E. Tollerud,et al. A dichotomy in satellite quenching around L* galaxies , 2013, 1307.3552.
[99] The DEEP2 galaxy redshift survey: evolution of the colour–density relation at 0.4 < z < 1.35 , 2006, astro-ph/0607512.
[100] M. Dickinson,et al. Cosmic Star-Formation History , 1996, 1403.0007.
[101] Carnegie,et al. CANDELS: THE PROGENITORS OF COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2012, 1206.5000.
[102] M. Peth,et al. EVOLUTION OF STAR FORMATION PROPERTIES OF HIGH-REDSHIFT CLUSTER GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 , 2015, 1508.01294.
[103] T. Tal,et al. THE RELATION BETWEEN COMPACT, QUIESCENT HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES AND MASSIVE NEARBY ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES: EVIDENCE FOR HIERARCHICAL, INSIDE-OUT GROWTH , 2009, 0903.2044.
[104] B. Tinsley,et al. The evolution of disk galaxies and the origin of S0 galaxies , 1980 .
[105] The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Luminosity functions by density environment and galaxy type , 2005 .
[106] Kraków,et al. Ram pressure stripping of the multiphase ISM and star formation in the Virgo spiral galaxy NGC 4330 , 2011, 1111.5236.
[107] R. Bender,et al. Galaxy Environment in the 3D-HST Fields: Witnessing the Onset of Satellite Quenching at z ∼ 1–2 , 2016, 1611.07524.
[108] C. Conselice,et al. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence: the colour–density relation at fixed stellar mass persists to z∼ 1 , 2010, 1007.1967.
[109] Christopher J. Miller,et al. Galaxy ecology: groups and low-density environments in the SDSS and 2dFGRS , 2003, astro-ph/0311379.
[110] Leiden,et al. Quenching massive galaxies with on-the-fly feedback in cosmological hydrodynamic simulations , 2010, 1012.3166.
[111] K. Glazebrook,et al. DIFFERENCES IN THE STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES AND STAR FORMATION RATES OF FIELD AND CLUSTER GALAXIES AT Z ∼ 1 , 2016, 1605.05314.
[112] J. Loveday,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the effect of close interactions on star formation in galaxies , 2015, 1507.04447.
[113] C. Carollo,et al. The confinement of star-forming galaxies into a main sequence through episodes of gas compaction, depletion and replenishment , 2015, 1509.02529.
[114] Michigan.,et al. ZFOURGE/CANDELS: ON THE EVOLUTION OF M* GALAXY PROGENITORS FROM z = 3 TO 0.5 , 2014, 1412.3806.
[115] M. Boylan-Kolchin,et al. Taking care of business in a flash : constraining the time-scale for low-mass satellite quenching with ELVIS , 2015, 1503.06803.
[116] S. Lilly,et al. QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY GROUPS: CENTRALS, SATELLITES, AND GALACTIC CONFORMITY , 2014, 1408.2553.
[117] J. Gunn,et al. On the Infall of Matter into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution , 1972 .
[118] C. Conselice,et al. THE DEPENDENCE OF QUENCHING UPON THE INNER STRUCTURE OF GALAXIES AT 0.5 ⩽ z < 0.8 IN THE DEEP2/AEGIS SURVEY , 2012, 1210.4173.
[119] Y. University,et al. A TALE OF DWARFS AND GIANTS: USING A z = 1.62 CLUSTER TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE RED SEQUENCE GREW OVER THE LAST 9.5 BILLION YEARS , 2012, 1203.3541.
[120] S. Wuyts,et al. DENSE CORES IN GALAXIES OUT TO z = 2.5 IN SDSS, UltraVISTA, AND THE FIVE 3D-HST/CANDELS FIELDS , 2014, 1404.4874.
[121] B. Mobasher,et al. THE EFFECTS OF THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT AND STELLAR MASS ON GALAXY QUENCHING TO z ∼ 3 , 2016, 1605.03182.
[122] B. Garilli,et al. THE 10k zCOSMOS: MORPHOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF GALAXIES IN THE GROUP ENVIRONMENT SINCE z ∼1 , 2009, 0909.2032.
[123] S. White,et al. Galaxy formation in the Planck cosmology – I. Matching the observed evolution of star formation rates, colours and stellar masses , 2014, 1410.0365.
[124] CANDELS Observations Of The Environmental Dependence Of The Color-Mass-Morphology Relation At Z=1.6 , 2013, 1305.0607.
[125] H. Mo,et al. Properties of galaxy groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey – I. The dependence of colour, star formation and morphology on halo mass , 2005, astro-ph/0509147.
[126] C. Conselice,et al. Galaxy environments in the UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey , 2011, 1101.0849.
[127] A Physical Model for the Coevolution of QSOs and Their Spheroidal Hosts , 2003, astro-ph/0307202.
[128] Carnegie,et al. The SAGA Survey. I. Satellite Galaxy Populations around Eight Milky Way Analogs , 2017, 1705.06743.
[129] Ram pressure stripping of spiral galaxies in clusters , 1999, astro-ph/9903436.
[130] Jan T. Kleyna,et al. The tidal stripping of satellites , 2005, astro-ph/0506687.
[131] S. Faber,et al. Satellite Quenching, Galaxy Inner Density and the Halo Environment , 2016, 1607.06091.