Assessing the Performance of a Handheld Laser Scanning System for Individual Tree Mapping - A Mixed Forests Showcase in Spain

The use of mobile laser scanning to survey forest ecosystems is a promising, scalable technology to describe the 3D structure of forests at a high resolution. We use a structurally complex, mixed-species Mediterranean forest to test the performance of a mobile Handheld Laser Scanning (HLS) system to estimate tree attributes within a forest patch in central Spain. We describe the different stages of the HLS approach: field position, ground data collection, scanning path design, point cloud processing, alignment between detected trees and measured reference trees, and finally, the assessment of main tree structural attributes diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height considering species and tree size as control factors. We surveyed 418 reference trees to account for omission and commission error rates over a 1 ha plot divided into 16 sections and scanned using two different scanning paths. The HLS-based approach reached a high of 88 and 92% tree detection rate for the best combination of scanning path and point cloud processing modes for the HLS system. The root mean squared errors for DBH estimates varied between species: errors for Pinus pinaster were below 2 cm for Scan 02. Quercus pyrenaica, and Alnus glutinosa showed higher error rates. We observed good agreement between ALS and HLS estimates for tree height, highlighting differences to field measurements. Despite the complexity of the mixed forest area surveyed, our results show that HLS is highly efficient at detecting tree locations, estimating DBH, and supporting tree height measurements as confirmed with airborne laser data used for validation. This study is one of the first HLS-based studies conducted in the Mediterranean mixed forest region, where variability in tree allometries and spacing and the presence of natural regeneration pose challenges for the HLS approach. HLS is a feasible, time-efficient, scalable technology for tree mapping in mixed forests with potential to support forest monitoring programmes such as national forest inventories lacking three-dimensional, remote sensing data to support field measurements.

[1]  A. Nothdurft,et al.  Automatic tree crown segmentation using dense forest point clouds from Personal Laser Scanning (PLS) , 2022, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[2]  C. Ginzler,et al.  Benchmarking laser scanning and terrestrial photogrammetry to extract forest inventory parameters in a complex temperate forest , 2022, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[3]  E. Malinverni,et al.  Comparing Mobile Laser Scanner and manual measurements for dendrometric variables estimation in a black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) plantation , 2022, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[4]  M. Mokroš,et al.  SLAM AND INS BASED POSITIONAL ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL OBJECTS UNDER THE FOREST CANOPY , 2022, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[5]  A. Galati,et al.  The efficiency of LiDAR HMLS scanning in monitoring forest structure parameters: implications for sustainable forest management , 2022, EuroMed Journal of Business.

[6]  A. Nothdurft,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Stem Cross-Section Modeling in 3D Point Clouds from TLS and Caliper Measurements for Basal Area Estimation , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Juan Alberto Molina-Valero,et al.  Interpreting the uncertainty of model-based and design-based estimation in downscaling estimates from NFI data: a case-study in Extremadura (Spain) , 2022, GIScience & Remote Sensing.

[8]  Mohammad Sadegh Taskhiri,et al.  Forest Structural Complexity Tool - An Open Source, Fully-Automated Tool for Measuring Forest Point Clouds , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Fábio Guimarães Gonçalves,et al.  Individual Tree Detection and Qualitative Inventory of a Eucalyptus sp. Stand Using UAV Photogrammetry Data , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  Individual Tree Segmentation Method Based on Mobile Backpack LiDAR Point Clouds , 2021, Sensors.

[11]  Wenshu Lin,et al.  Comparison of estimation algorithms for individual tree diameter at breast height based on hand-held mobile laser scanning , 2021, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research.

[12]  Adrián Pascual,et al.  Building Pareto Frontiers under tree-level forest planning using airborne laser scanning, growth models and spatial optimization , 2021, Forest Policy and Economics.

[13]  Andrew J. Sánchez Meador,et al.  Adjudicating Perspectives on Forest Structure: How Do Airborne, Terrestrial, and Mobile Lidar-Derived Estimates Compare? , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Paul Turner,et al.  Sensor Agnostic Semantic Segmentation of Structurally Diverse and Complex Forest Point Clouds Using Deep Learning , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Ana Daría Ruiz-González,et al.  Developing a site index model for P. Pinaster stands in NW Spain by combining bi-temporal ALS data and environmental data , 2021 .

[16]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Hand-Held Personal Laser Scanning , 2021 .

[17]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  lidR: An R package for analysis of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data , 2020 .

[18]  Christoph Gollob,et al.  Comparison of 3D Point Clouds Obtained by Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Personal Laser Scanning on Forest Inventory Sample Plots , 2020, Data.

[19]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of Backpack, Handheld, Under-Canopy UAV, and Above-Canopy UAV Laser Scanning for Field Reference Data Collection in Boreal Forests , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Daniel N. M. Donoghue,et al.  The effect of leaf-on and leaf-off forest canopy conditions on LiDAR derived estimations of forest structural diversity , 2020, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[21]  Christoph Gollob,et al.  Forest Inventory with Long Range and High-Speed Personal Laser Scanning (PLS) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) Technology , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[22]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Accurate derivation of stem curve and volume using backpack mobile laser scanning , 2020, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Adrián Pascual,et al.  Using Tree Detection Based on Airborne Laser Scanning to Improve Forest Inventory Considering Edge Effects and the Co-Registration Factor , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[24]  F. Bravo,et al.  Understory response to overstory and soil gradients in mixed versus monospecific Mediterranean pine forests , 2019, European Journal of Forest Research.

[25]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Modelling approaches for mixed forests dynamics prognosis. Research gaps and opportunities , 2019, Forest Systems.

[26]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  Influence of Scan Density on the Estimation of Single-Tree Attributes by Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning , 2019, Forests.

[27]  Zhongke Feng,et al.  Applicability of personal laser scanning in forestry inventory , 2019, PloS one.

[28]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Chaoyong Shen,et al.  Estimating Tree Position, Diameter at Breast Height, and Tree Height in Real-Time Using a Mobile Phone with RGB-D SLAM , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Comparison and Combination of Mobile and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Natural Forest Inventories , 2018, Forests.

[32]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Comparing Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and Wearable Laser Scanning (WLS) for Individual Tree Modeling at Plot Level , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Francesca Giannetti,et al.  Comparing Three Different Ground Based Laser Scanning Methods for Tree Stem Detection , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[34]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands , 2018 .

[35]  E. Zenner,et al.  Toward managing mixed-species stands: from parametrization to prescription , 2017, Forest Ecosystems.

[36]  Alexis Achim,et al.  Removing bias from LiDAR-based estimates of canopy height: Accounting for the effects of pulse density and footprint size , 2017 .

[37]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Automatic Estimation of Tree Position and Stem Diameter Using a Moving Terrestrial Laser Scanner , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[38]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes , 2017 .

[39]  Fabio Meloni,et al.  Direct Measurement of Tree Height Provides Different Results on the Assessment of LiDAR Accuracy , 2016 .

[40]  Sébastien Bauwens,et al.  Forest Inventory with Terrestrial LiDAR: A Comparison of Static and Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning , 2016 .

[41]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[42]  Emily Williams,et al.  Assessing Handheld Mobile Laser Scanners for Forest Surveys , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[43]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives , 2014 .

[44]  Christian Ammer,et al.  Efficient measurements of basal area in short rotation forests based on terrestrial laser scanning under special consideration of shadowing , 2014 .

[45]  E. Næsset,et al.  Forestry Applications of Airborne Laser Scanning , 2014, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[46]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Tree mapping using airborne, terrestrial and mobile laser scanning – A case study in a heterogeneous urban forest , 2013 .

[47]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic Stem Mapping Using Single-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[48]  Eduardo González-Ferreiro,et al.  Assessing the attributes of high-density Eucalyptus globulus stands using airborne laser scanner data , 2011 .

[49]  L. Monika Moskal,et al.  Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels , 2010 .

[50]  H. Pretzsch.  Forest Dynamics, Growth, and Yield , 2010 .

[51]  S. Zhang,et al.  Stem form variations in the natural stands of major commercial softwoods in eastern Canada , 2008 .

[52]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .

[53]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2008 .

[54]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[55]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.