Utility of the NIH Stroke Scale as a Predictor of Hospital Disposition

Background and Purpose— Early identification of stroke patients in need of rehabilitation or long-term nursing facility (NF) care may promote more efficient use of health care resources and lead to better outcomes. The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is an attractive candidate predictor of disposition because it is widely used, is easily learned, and can be performed rapidly on admission. Methods— We present a retrospective study of stroke patients admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset to a university hospital from March through June 2000. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, stroke type, prestroke living arrangement and independence, initial NIHSS, and medical complications during hospitalization. Results— Among 94 patients evaluated during the study period, 59% were discharged home, 30% to rehabilitation, and 11% to NF. In multivariate analyses, disposition was associated only with initial NIHSS. For each 1-point increase in NIHSS, the likelihood of going home was significantly reduced (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.89, P <0.001). Categorization of NIHSS was also predictive of disposition, with NIHSS ≤5 being most strongly associated with discharge home, NIHSS 6 to 13 with rehabilitation, and NIHSS >13 with NF (P <0.001). Although no other baseline characteristics predicted disposition, major medical complications during hospitalization tended to reduce the odds of going home (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.0, P =0.07). Conclusion— The NIHSS predicts postacute care disposition among stroke patients. Predicting disposition on the first day of admission may facilitate the time-consuming and costly process of securing a bed at rehabilitation or NF, and perhaps decrease unnecessary length of stay in acute care settings.

[1]  G. Murray,et al.  Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[2]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Retrospective Assessment of Initial Stroke Severity: Comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale , 2001, Stroke.

[3]  T. Olsen,et al.  What determines good recovery in patients with the most severe strokes? The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1999, Stroke.

[4]  R Côté,et al.  The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. , 1986, Stroke.

[5]  R. Sacco,et al.  Predictors of resource use after acute hospitalization , 2000, Neurology.

[6]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[7]  Gunnar B. Stickler,et al.  Prognosis , 1970 .

[8]  M. Alexander,et al.  Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting , 1996, Neurology.

[9]  G. Samsa,et al.  Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. , 1997, Stroke.

[10]  J. Orgogozo Advantages and Disadvantages of Neurological Scales , 1998, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[11]  W R Clarke,et al.  Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke , 1999, Neurology.

[12]  L. Williams,et al.  Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. , 2000, Stroke.

[13]  J. Rankin Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis , 1957, Scottish medical journal.

[14]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  A R Localio,et al.  Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records. , 1999, Stroke.

[16]  T. Brott,et al.  Improved Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale Using Video Training , 1994, Stroke.

[17]  W. O'Fallon,et al.  Use of nursing home after stroke and dependence on stroke severity: a population-based analysis. , 1999, Stroke.