Learning commons: Bridging the academic and student affairs divide to enhance learning across campus

Abstract The University of Guelph Learning Commons brings student affairs professionals and librarians together to offer students a coherent and integrated approach to learning, writing, research, and technology support. It is distinguished by three characteristics: (1) a partnership model between academic and student affairs; (2) a solid foundation of theoretical perspectives to guide program development; and (3) a conceptual model to frame services. These characteristics have placed the Learning Commons in a position to play a leadership role in facilitating and enhancing learning across the university. This article describes the Learning Commons, as well as the theoretical perspectives and conceptual framework upon which the programs and services are based.

[1]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. , 2005 .

[2]  Ruth Talbott Keimig.  Raising academic standards : a guide to learning improvement , 1983 .

[3]  Robert E. Dugan,et al.  Libraries Designed for Learning , 2004 .

[4]  David L. Amsbury,et al.  Detrital dolomite in central Texas , 1962 .

[5]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  Students' Out-of-Class Experiences and Their Influence on Learning and Cognitive Development: A Literature Review. , 1996 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[7]  B. Rogoff.  Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[8]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[9]  David R. Arendale,et al.  Supplemental Instruction: Improving first-year student success in high risk courses , 1992 .

[10]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[11]  David Arendale,et al.  Supplemental Instruction (SI): Review of Research Concerning the Effectiveness of SI from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and Other Institutions from across the United States. , 1997 .

[12]  Michael Gorman.  Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[13]  David R. Arendale,et al.  Supplemental Instruction: Improving Student Performance, Increasing Student Persistence. , 1990 .

[14]  N. Stahl.  Ten Recommendations from Research for Teaching High-Risk College Students. , 1992 .

[15]  Neal Whitman,et al.  Peer Teaching: To Teach Is to Learn Twice , 1988 .

[16]  G. Gibbs.  Improving the Quality of Student Learning , 1992 .

[17]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[18]  N. Entwistle.  Contrasting Perspectives on Learning , 2005 .

[19]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[20]  Why Adjunct Courses Work , 1988 .

[21]  Lorcan Dempsey,et al.  The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition : A Report to the OCLC Membership , 2004 .

[22]  M. J. Barr.  The Handbook of Student Affairs Administration , 1993 .

[23]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[24]  Deanna C. Martin,et al.  Breaking the Attrition Cycle: The Effects of Supplemental Instruction on Undergraduate Performance and Attrition. , 1983 .

[25]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[26]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[27]  G. Kuh.  Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates , 1996 .

[28]  A. Astin.  What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[29]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[30]  J. Donald.  Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives , 2002 .

[31]  D. Schunk.  Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .