Self-Governance Through Group Discussion in Wikipedia

Virtual teams and other online groups can find it challenging to establish norms that allow them to effectively balance task and relational aspects of their discussions. Yet, in our reliance on organizational and team theories, small group scholars have overlooked the potential for learning from examples offered by online communities. Theories of deliberation in small groups offer scholars a way to assess such discussion-centered self-governance in online groups. The study operationalizes the conceptual definition of deliberative discussion offered by Gastil and Black (2008) to examine the small group discussions that undergird policy-making processes in a well-established online community, Wikipedia. Content analysis shows that these discussions demonstrated a relatively high level of problem analysis and providing of information, but results were mixed in the group’s demonstration of respect, consideration, and mutual comprehension. Network visualizations reveal structural patterns that can be useful in examining equality, influence, and group member roles. The combination of measures has implications for future research in deliberative discussion and virtual teamwork.

[1]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[2]  K. Lewin,et al.  An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: a preliminary note. , 1938 .

[3]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates” , 1939 .

[4]  Joseph E. McGrath.  Small group research , 1966 .

[5]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context , 1990 .

[6]  Stephen L. Elkin.  Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[7]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[8]  John Gastil,et al.  Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication , 1993 .

[9]  Matthew C. Ehrlich,et al.  Strategic Ambiguity in the Birth of a Loosely Coupled Organization , 1993 .

[10]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[12]  Alain Boyer.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[13]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[14]  P. Kollock,et al.  Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities , 1996 .

[15]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[16]  J. Bohman.  Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[17]  W. Barnett Pearce,et al.  Moral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide , 1997 .

[18]  Julian Dibbell.  My Tiny Life: Crime and Passion in a Virtual World , 1998 .

[19]  R. Asen.  Toward a Normative Conception of Difference in Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[20]  B. Smit.  Chemie in cyberspace , 1999 .

[21]  N. Baym.  Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community , 1999 .

[22]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[23]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[24]  John Gastil,et al.  By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections , 2000 .

[25]  S. Coleman,et al.  Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation , 2001 .

[26]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[27]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Media Participation , 2001, New Media Soc..

[28]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[29]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[30]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[31]  J. Cappella,et al.  Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue During Campaign 2000 , 2002 .

[32]  John B. Horrigan,et al.  Pew Internet & American Life Project , 2002 .

[33]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[34]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Studying Complex Discursive Systems: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication. , 2002 .

[35]  M. Steenbergen,et al.  Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index , 2003 .

[36]  Andrea Ciffolilli,et al.  Phantom authority, self-selective recruitment and retention of members in virtual communities: The case of Wikipedia , 2003, First Monday.

[37]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[38]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[40]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Experiment 1 : Motivating Conversational Contributions Through Group Homogeneity and Individual Uniqueness , 2010 .

[41]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space , 2004, CHI.

[42]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[43]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[44]  Andrew Lih,et al.  Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource , 2004 .

[45]  David Lazer,et al.  Network Theory and Small Groups , 2004 .

[46]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  A Look at Groups from the Functional Perspective , 2005 .

[47]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  Framework for Governance in Open Source Communities , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[48]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia , 2005, GROUP.

[49]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[50]  S. Wheelan.  The Handbook of Group Research and Practice , 2005 .

[51]  Les Gasser,et al.  Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia , 2005, ICIQ.

[52]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[53]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Measuring Group Efficacy in Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[54]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Virtually Working: Communicative and Structural Predictors of Media Use and Key Outcomes in Virtual Work Teams , 2006 .

[55]  David Beard,et al.  Democracy as Discussion: Civic Education and the American Forum Movement , 2006 .

[56]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion Groups , 2007, J. Soc. Struct..

[57]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley.  Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme , 2007, Regular Issue.

[58]  John Gastil,et al.  Public Deliberation as the Organizing Principle of Political Communication Research , 2007 .

[59]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia , 2007, CHI.

[60]  Petra M. Bosch-Sijtsema,et al.  The Impact of Individual Expectations and Expectation Conflicts on Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[61]  J. Webster,et al.  Exploring Traditional and Virtual Team Members’ “Best Practices” , 2007 .

[62]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  I Know I Can, But Can We? , 2007 .

[63]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? , 2007 .

[64]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2007 Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia , 2022 .

[65]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  Analysing Social Networks Via the Internet , 2007 .

[66]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation , 2007, GROUP.

[67]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms , 2007, WWW '07.

[68]  C. Saunders,et al.  “Is It Already 4 a.m. in Your Time Zone?” , 2007 .

[69]  Todd R. Davies,et al.  Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice , 2008 .

[70]  M. Waldrop,et al.  Science 2.0. , 2008, Scientific American.

[71]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in wikipedia through barnstars , 2008, CSCW.

[72]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something , 2008, WWW.

[73]  L. Black.  Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments , 2008 .

[74]  John Gastil,et al.  Political Communication and Deliberation , 2008 .

[75]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[76]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  Wikipedian Self-Governance in Action: Motivating the Policy Lens , 2021, ICWSM.

[77]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Distilling Digital Traces: Computational Social Science Approaches to Studying the Internet , 2008 .

[78]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia , 2008, CHI.

[79]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[80]  Wiki Collaboration Within Political Parties : Benefits and Challenges , 2009 .

[81]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen,et al.  Realities of Working in Virtual Teams: Affective and Attitudinal Outcomes of Using Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009 .

[82]  B. Noveck.  Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[83]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2010 .

[84]  Itai Himelboim,et al.  Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[85]  Ramón Rico,et al.  The joint relationships of communication behaviors and task interdependence on trust building and change in virtual project teams , 2009 .

[86]  Scott C. D'Urso.  The Past, Present, and Future of Human Communication and Technology Research: An Introduction , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[87]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Trust Dynamics in Work-Oriented Virtual Teams , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[88]  Priscilla S. Markwood,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[89]  Ita Richardson,et al.  Virtual Teams , 2010, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering.

[90]  Laura D. Russell,et al.  “The Secret is Out!” Supporting Weight Loss through Online Interaction , 2010 .

[91]  Nathaniel J. Klemp,et al.  From Town-Halls to Wikis: Exploring Wikipedia’s Implications for Deliberative Democracy , 2010 .

[92]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation , 2011 .

[93]  J. Hayden.  Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age , 2011 .

[94]  R. Bales.  Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. , 2013 .