Can coronary computed tomographic angiography trigger coronary revascularization? Questioning the appropriateness of the question.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] U. Siebert,et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] W. Wijns,et al. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[3] Mario J. Garcia,et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[4] Frederick A. Masoudi,et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/MTS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization. Commentary , 2009 .
[5] Mathias Prokop,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] N. Paul,et al. Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .
[7] M. Budoff,et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] Ioannis Kakadiaris,et al. Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] Guido Germano,et al. Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.
[10] H. Alkadhi,et al. Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[11] D. Berman,et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[12] Konstantin Nikolaou,et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] N. Mullani,et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. , 1989, Circulation.
[14] N. Mullani,et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VIII. Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[15] J. Ritchie,et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. III. Clinical trial. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.