Training Evaluation Based on Cases of Taiwanese Benchmarked High-Tech Companies

Although the influence of workplace practices and employees experiences with training effectiveness has received considerable attention, less is known of the influence of workplace practices on training evaluation methods. The purposes of this study were to: (1) explore and understand the training evaluation methods used by seven Taiwanese companies benchmarked for their excellence' and (2) compare Kirkpatricks and Swansons training evaluation models with practices used by the benchmarked Taiwanese organizations from a cross-cultural perspective. Five themes emerged from in-depth interviews, extending our understanding of training evaluation in the benchmarked Taiwanese organizations.

[1]  Richard A. Swanson,et al.  The Foundations of Performance Improvement and Implications for Practice , 1999 .

[2]  Winston Bennett,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA , 1997 .

[3]  Elwood F. Holton,et al.  Large-Scale Performance-Driven Training Needs Assessment , 2000 .

[4]  Elwood F. Holton Holton's Evaluation Model: New Evidence and Construct Elaborations , 2005 .

[5]  Joseph S. Wholey Performance-Based Management: Responding to the Challenges , 1999 .

[6]  Darlene Russ-Eft,et al.  Evaluation in Organizations: A Systematic Approach to Enhancing Learning, Performance, and Change , 2001 .

[7]  Gary N. McLean Examining approaches to HR evaluation: The strengths and weaknesses of popular measurement methods , 2005 .

[8]  Dean R. Spitzer,et al.  Human Resource Development Measurement and Evaluation: Looking Back and Moving Forward , 2005 .

[9]  Hallie Preskill,et al.  Using Critical Incidents To Model Effective Evaluation Practice in the Teaching of Evaluation. , 1997 .

[10]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1988 .

[11]  Elwood F. Holton The flawed four‐level evaluation model , 1996 .

[12]  G. Alliger,et al.  KIRKPATRICK'S LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA: THIRTY YEARS LATER , 1989 .

[13]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[14]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[15]  Paula Berardinelli,et al.  Systematic performance improvement – refining the space between learning and results , 2003 .

[16]  Donovan A. McFarlane,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels , 2006 .

[17]  D. Kirkpatrick Invited reaction: Reaction to holton article , 1996 .

[18]  Robert Maribe Branch,et al.  Systematic Pilot Testing as a Step in the Instructional Design Process of Corporate Training and Development. , 2008 .

[19]  Jack J. Phillips,et al.  Return on Investment in Training and Performance Improvement Programs , 1997 .

[20]  Sharon Bartram,et al.  Evaluating Training: A Resource for Measuring the Results and Impact of Training on People, Departments and Organizations , 1999 .

[21]  John M. Keller,et al.  Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick , 1994 .

[22]  P. Marginson Multinational Britain: Employment and Work In an Internationalised Economy , 1994 .

[23]  Bryan S. Schaffer,et al.  A Review of Cross-Cultural Methodologies for Organizational Research: A Best- Practices Approach , 2003 .

[24]  Thomas F. Gilbert,et al.  Human Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance , 1978 .

[25]  Samuel Forest Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development , 1955 .

[26]  Leigh Ann Williams Measurement Made Simple. , 1996 .

[27]  Robert O. Brinkerhoff The Success Case Method: A Strategic Evaluation Approach to Increasing the Value and Effect of Training , 2005 .

[28]  Scott Gerald Miller Effects of a Municipal Training Program on Employee Behavior and Attitude , 1990 .

[29]  Clifton A. Cpa Cgfm Williams Performance-Based Management , 2009 .

[30]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  Invited reaction: Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory , 2000 .

[31]  Doris B. Collins Performance-Level Evaluation Methods Used in Management Development Studies from 1986 to 2000 , 2002 .

[32]  M. Scriven Evaluation thesaurus, 4th ed. , 1991 .

[33]  Barry K. Beyer,et al.  How to conduct a formative evaluation , 1995 .

[34]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[35]  Geary A. Rummler,et al.  Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart , 1990 .

[36]  Jack J. Phillips ROI: The Search for Best Practices. , 1996 .

[37]  Junaidah Hashim Training evaluation: clients’ roles , 2001 .

[38]  Analysis for improving performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations and documenting workplace expertise, by Richard A. Swanson. (1994). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. 325 pp., $32.95 cloth. , 1995 .

[39]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation , 1998 .

[40]  Kenneth R. Bartlett,et al.  The utilization of training program evaluation in corporate universities , 2004 .

[41]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[42]  Theo Bastiaens,et al.  Results: How to assess performance, learning, and perceptions in organizations, by Richard A. Swanson and Elwood F. Holton III , 2000 .

[43]  Robert O. Brinkerhoff An integrated evaluation model for HRD , 1988 .

[44]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[45]  Darlene Russ-Eft,et al.  In Search of the Holy Grail: Return on Investment Evaluation in Human Resource Development , 2005 .

[46]  D. Kirkpatrick Techniques for evaluating training programs , 1979 .

[47]  M. Smith,et al.  Training in Organizations , 1991 .