Perception of hand motion direction uses a gravitational reference

We studied possible frames of reference for kinesthetic perception of imposed hand motion direction in the frontal plane in ten young adult subjects with no history of neuromuscular disease. In one experiment, subjects were instructed to set unseen hand motion imposed by a motorized linear slide device parallel to the trunk-fixed longitudinal axis, seven visually specified axes and vertical (gravitational axis) while in a standard erect head/trunk posture and with head/trunk orientation varied. The visually specified axes were presented on a head-mounted display that also blocked vision of the external environment. In a second experiment using the same device, subjects set unseen hand motion parallel to vertical and to subjective oblique directions of 45° clockwise (cw) and counter clockwise (ccw) from vertical in erect and varied head/trunk postures. Errors for setting hand motion to vertical and to verbally specified oblique axes (45° cw and ccw from vertical) were lower than to the trunk longitudinal axis and visually specified axes. There were clear oblique effects in setting hand motion to visually specified axes and to subjective oblique (45° cw and ccw) axes. When head and trunk orientation were varied, variable errors were higher for all axes, but remained lowest for vertical and subjective oblique axes. Moreover, errors for setting hand motion to all axes depended on head/trunk orientation. Overall, these results show that kinesthetic perception of imposed hand motion uses a subjective gravitational frame of reference that varies somewhat with head/trunk orientation.

[1]  Edouard Gentaz,et al.  Body tilt effect on the reproduction of orientations: studies on the visual oblique effect and subjective orientations. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  A. Streri,et al.  Reference frame and haptic discrimination of orientations in infants , 2005, Neuroreport.

[3]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large Systematic Deviations in the Haptic Perception of Parallelity , 1999, Perception.

[4]  Orientation identification at different background levels: its precision and distortions , 1993, Vision Research.

[5]  H. Bouma,et al.  Perceived orientation of isolated line segments. , 1968, Vision research.

[6]  E Gentaz,et al.  Role of memorization conditions in the haptic processing of orientations and the 'oblique effect'. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[7]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Kinesthetic perception of visually specified axes , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Michel Guerraz,et al.  Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: Body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Origin and processing of postural information , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  W. G. Darling,et al.  Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body- fixed axes , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  G. Allen,et al.  Bias in spatial memory: a categorical endorsement. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[14]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Motor commands contribute to human position sense , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Turvey,et al.  The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  M. Turvey,et al.  Exteroception and exproprioception by dynamic touch are different functions of the inertia tensor , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Gabriel Baud-Bovy,et al.  Amplitude and direction errors in kinesthetic pointing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  J. Roll,et al.  Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  C. Gielen,et al.  Separate control of arm position and velocity demonstrated by vibration of muscle tendon in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Warren G. Darling,et al.  Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  W. G. Darling,et al.  Perception of forearm angles in 3-dimensional space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Approaches to the study of haptic sensing. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  L. Elizabeth Crawford,et al.  Spatial categories and the estimation of location , 2004, Cognition.

[25]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  John P Spencer,et al.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Jadran Lenarčič,et al.  Advances in Robot Kinematics , 2000 .

[29]  James P. Schmiedeler,et al.  Human Hand Movement Kinematics and Kinesthesia , 2004 .

[30]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[31]  G. Orban,et al.  Human orientation discrimination tested with long stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[32]  M T Turvey,et al.  Spatial and physical frames of reference in positioning a limb , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[34]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Does position sense at the elbow reflect a sense of elbow joint angle or one of limb orientation? , 1982, Brain Research.

[35]  Astrid M.L. Kappers,et al.  Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  J. Lackner,et al.  Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. , 2000, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[37]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotations Remaps Movement Vectors, Not Final Positions , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Gabriel Baud-Bovy,et al.  The haptic reproduction of orientations in three-dimensional space , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Expertise and Attunement to Kinematic Constraints , 2008, Perception.

[40]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[41]  W. Darling,et al.  The Visual Perception Coordinate System Uses Axes Defined by the Earth, Trunk, and Vision , 2005, Perception.

[42]  J. Soechting,et al.  Frames of Reference for Hand Orientation , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Lackner,et al.  Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  I. Evdokimidis,et al.  Systematic errors of planar arm movements provide evidence for space categorization effects and interaction of multiple frames of reference , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.