Experimental Evolution of Mating Discrimination in Budding Yeast

Assortative mating, when individuals of similar phenotypes mate, likely plays a key role in preventing gene flow during speciation. Reinforcement occurs when two previously geographically separated (allopatric) groups meet after having evolved partial postzygotic isolation; they are selected to evolve or enhance assortative mating to prevent costly intergroup matings that produce only maladaptive or sterile hybrids. Studies in Drosophila have shown that the genetic architectures of mating discrimination could differ significantly with or without reinforcement, suggesting that the evolution of assortative mating may be more complicated than expected. To study the evolution of assortative mating, we evolved mating discrimination in populations of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. After 36 cycles of selection, these cells are five times more likely to mate with each other than to their ancestors, despite detectable one-way gene flow between the selected and reference populations. Several individual cultures evolved mating discrimination by changing their mating kinetics, with some mating more rapidly and others more slowly than the ancestral population. Genetic analysis indicates that multiple mutations have accumulated to produce the altered mating preference. Our results show that subtle details of mating behavior can play an important role in the evolution of reproductive isolation.

[1]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .

[2]  J. Thoday,et al.  Isolation by Disruptive Selection , 1962, Nature.

[3]  S. Palumbi,et al.  Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  R. Butlin Speciation by reinforcement. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  S. Crossley CHANGES IN MATING BEHAVIOR PRODUCED BY SELECTION FOR ETHOLOGICAL ISOLATION BETWEEN EBONY AND VESTIGIAL MUTANTS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1974, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  M. Noor Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. , 1999, Heredity.

[7]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Reinforcement of pre-zygotic isolation and karyotype evolution in Agrodiaetus butterflies , 2005, Nature.

[8]  G. Fink,et al.  A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance , 1984, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[9]  A. Parsons,et al.  Mode of selection and experimental evolution of antifungal drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Genetics.

[10]  R. Reenan,et al.  Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. , 1992, Genetics.

[11]  D. Botstein,et al.  Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Radford Methods in yeast genetics — A laboratory course manual by M Rose, F Winston and P Hieter. pp 198. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. 1990. $34 ISBN 0‐87969‐354‐1 , 1991 .

[13]  J. Toyn,et al.  A counterselection for the tryptophan pathway in yeast: 5‐fluoroanthranilic acid resistance , 2000, Yeast.

[14]  K. Koopman NATURAL SELECTION FOR REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS , 1950 .

[15]  W. Swanson,et al.  The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  E. Elion,et al.  Pheromone response, mating and cell biology. , 2000, Current opinion in microbiology.

[17]  Friedrich Lottspeich,et al.  Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1 , 1999, Nature.

[18]  J. Drake A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  W. Swanson,et al.  The abalone egg vitelline envelope receptor for sperm lysin is a giant multivalent molecule. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. R. Powell,et al.  PARTIALLY SUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT TO ENHANCE REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN SEMISPECIES OF DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  E. Paterniani SELECTION FOR REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN TWO POPULATIONS OF MAIZE, ZEA MAYS L. , , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  M. Higgie,et al.  Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation , 2005, Nature.

[23]  K. Murata,et al.  Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  Brian A Counterman,et al.  The Genetics of Speciation by Reinforcement , 2004, PLoS biology.

[25]  Leland H. Hartwell,et al.  Courtship in S. cerevisiae: Both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal , 1990, Cell.

[26]  F. Sherman,et al.  Selection of lys2 Mutants of the Yeast SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE by the Utilization of alpha-AMINOADIPATE. , 1979, Genetics.