A grid implementation of the SLUTH algorithm for visualising the depth and structural index of magnetic sources

[1]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Depth and shape estimates from simultaneous inversion of magnetic fields and their gradient components using differential similarity transforms , 2009 .

[2]  I. Lahti,et al.  Tilt derivative multiscale edges of magnetic data , 2010 .

[3]  Matthias Holschneider,et al.  Wavelet analysis of potential fields , 1997 .

[4]  Maurizio Fedi,et al.  Toward a full multiscale approach to interpret potential fields , 2009 .

[5]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Source location using total-field homogeneity: Introducing the SLUTH method for depth estimation , 2007 .

[6]  Maurizio Fedi,et al.  DEXP: A fast method to determine the depth and the structural index of potential fields sources , 2007 .

[7]  Dominique Gibert,et al.  Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Complex wavelets and application to aeromagnetic profiles in French Guiana , 2000 .

[8]  D. T. Thompson,et al.  EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data , 1982 .

[9]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  iSPITM— the improved source parameter imaging method , 1998 .

[10]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) method , 2005 .

[11]  Vijay Singh,et al.  Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources , 1994 .

[12]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Three-dimensional interpretation of magnetic and gravity anomalies using the finite-difference similarity transform , 2010 .

[13]  R. Blakely,et al.  Sedimentary basins reconnaissance using the magnetic Tilt-Depth method , 2010 .

[14]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Depth and structural index from normalized local wavenumber of 2D magnetic anomalies , 2005 .

[15]  A. Reid,et al.  Degrees of homogeneity of potential fields and structural indices of Euler deconvolution , 2007 .

[16]  Walter R. Roest,et al.  Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal , 1992 .

[17]  Misac N. Nabighian,et al.  The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section; its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation , 1972 .

[18]  H. Naudy.  AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF DEPTH ON AEROMAGNETIC PROFILES , 1971 .

[19]  Dominique Gibert,et al.  The theory of the continuous wavelet transform in the interpretation of potential fields: a review , 2009 .

[20]  Pierre Keating,et al.  Estimating depth and model type using the continuous wavelet transform of magnetic data , 2004 .

[21]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data , 2002 .

[22]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  An enhanced method for source parameter imaging of magnetic data collected for mineral exploration , 2005 .

[23]  D. Teskey,et al.  A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation , 1970 .

[24]  F. Boschetti,et al.  Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain , 1999 .

[25]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method , 1997 .

[26]  W. Dean.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS FOR GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION , 1958 .

[27]  K. Brazda,et al.  Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi‐automated interpretation methods , 2009 .

[28]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Tilt-depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives , 2007 .

[29]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives , 2008 .

[30]  Marc A. Vallée,et al.  Automation of the SLUTH method: a novel approach to airborne magnetic data interpretation , 2010 .

[31]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Imaging the Depth, Structure And Susceptibility From Magnetic Data: the Advanced Source Parameter Imaging Method , 2004 .

[32]  I. W. Somerton,et al.  Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution , 1990 .

[33]  Pierre Keating.  Improved use of the local wavenumber in potential-field interpretation , 2009 .