Lymph node metastases as only qualifier for stage IV serous ovarian cancer confers longer survival than other sites of distant disease – a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study

Abstract Background: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) ovarian cancer staging system includes no sub-stage for lymph nodes (LN) as only distant disease manifestation. We explore the prognostic implication of LN as only stage IV classifier in serous ovarian cancer. Method: This is a nation-wide, population-based study on 551 women with serous stage IV cancers diagnosed between 2009–2014. We compare overall survival (OS) in women with LN as only distant metastatic site to those with pleural metastases only and to patients with other/multiple stage IV manifestations. Cox regression models were used for uni- and multivariable estimations. Results: Of 551stage IV cases, distant metastatic site was registered in 433. Median OS for women with LN (n = 51) was 41.4 months, compared to 25.2 and 26.8 months for patients with pleural (n = 195) or other/multiple (n = 187) distant metastases (p = .0007). The corresponding five-year survival rates were 32, 11 and 22%, respectively. Multivariable analyzes confirmed shorter survival for women with pleural (HR 2.99, p = .001) or other/multiple distant sites (HR 2.67, p = .007), as compared to LN cases. LN only patients lived 9.1 months longer after primary than after interval surgery, but this difference was not significant (p = .245). Conclusion: Women with stage IV serous ovarian cancer having lymph nodes as only distant metastatic site live longer than other stage IV patients.

[1]  M. Frey,et al.  Should epithelial ovarian carcinoma metastatic to the inguinal lymph nodes be assigned stage IVB? , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  P. Kjølhede,et al.  Data quality in the Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer – a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[3]  J. Griggs,et al.  Use and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  I. Vergote,et al.  How to Select Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Patients With Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Carcinoma. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  L. Chiva,et al.  FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer revisited. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  E. Ko,et al.  Non-surgical management of ovarian cancer: Prevalence and implications. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  B. Mosgaard,et al.  Restaging and Survival Analysis of 4036 Ovarian Cancer Patients According to the 2013 FIGO Classification for Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[8]  L. Chiva,et al.  What Should We Expect After a Complete Cytoreduction at the Time of Interval or Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer? , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  B. Ataseven,et al.  Prognostic impact of debulking surgery and residual tumor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IV. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  Jeong-Won Lee,et al.  Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification , 2015, Obstetrics & gynecology science.

[11]  B. Ottesen,et al.  Differences in Regional Diagnostic Strategies and in Intended Versus Actual First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer in Denmark , 2014, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[12]  Jaime Prat,et al.  Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum , 2014, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  B. van Calster,et al.  Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Management of Stage IIIC–IV Ovarian Cancer: Survey Results from the Members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology , 2012, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[14]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Differences in Tumor Type in Low-stage Versus High-stage Ovarian Carcinomas , 2010, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[15]  A. Reuss,et al.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials , 2009, Cancer.

[16]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register – a sample survey for year 1998 , 2009, Acta oncologica.

[17]  S. Baek,et al.  Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer classified solely by lymph node metastasis has a more favorable prognosis than other types of stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2008, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[18]  G. Scambia,et al.  Ovarian cancer patients with "node-positive-only" Stage IIIC disease have a more favorable outcome than Stage IIIA/B. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  R. Walker,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs , 2005 .

[20]  E. Trimble,et al.  Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Y. Taketani,et al.  Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to Stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients , 1998, Cancer.

[22]  Salvatore Ca,et al.  [Carcinoma of the ovary]. , 1960, Anais brasileiros de ginecologia.

[23]  E. Åvall-Lundqvist,et al.  Population-based study of survival for women with serous cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum or undesignated origin - on behalf of the Swedish gynecological cancer group (SweGCG). , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  S. Silverberg Histopathologic grading of ovarian carcinoma: a review and proposal. , 2000, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.