Implementation of targeted interventions to control Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a commercial abattoir.

The objective of this study was to define locations on the carcass with highest contamination of E. coli O157 throughout the harvest process and implement targeted interventions to reduce or eliminate contamination. To establish a pathogen baseline, samples were collected at the foreshank, hindshank, inside round, neck and midline area and evaluated for E. coli O157:H7 presence. Environmental samples were also collected in the harvest area and the fabrication area of the facility. E. coli O157:H7 prevalence was highest on the foreshank, hindshank and inside rounds in the baseline study and steam vacuums/cones were implemented as an intervention in these specific areas on the harvest floor. At pre-evisceration, foreshank prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 was significantly (P<0.05) reduced from 21.7% to 3.1% after the application of steam interventions. At the final rail, foreshank prevalence in the baseline study was 4.2% while no E. coli O157:H7 was detected post-intervention implementation. E. coli O157:H7 on hindshanks and inside rounds was significantly reduced after intervention implementation from 24.2 to 11.5% and 37.5 to 16.7%, respectively at the final rail. Pathogen contamination of environmental samples collected in fabrication declined from 6.7% to 0.7% after slaughter interventions were implemented. Data indicate the identifying areas of contamination on the carcass and implementing interventions can significantly reduce E. coli O157 on the carcasses and in the fabrication environment.

[1]  J. Savell,et al.  Decontamination of beef carcass surface tissue by steam vacuuming alone and combined with hot water and lactic acid sprays. , 1999, Journal of food protection.

[2]  R. Bell Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses , 1997, Journal of applied microbiology.

[3]  J. Sofos,et al.  Comparison of sampling methods for microbiological testing of beef animal rectal/colonal feces, hides, and carcasses. , 2002, Journal of food protection.

[4]  D. M. Allen,et al.  Escherichia coli O157 prevalence and enumeration of aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli O157 at various steps in commercial beef processing plants. , 2004, Journal of food protection.

[5]  J. Savell,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Decontamination from Beef Carcass Surfaces. , 1995, Journal of food protection.

[6]  X. Nou,et al.  Seasonal prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, and Salmonella in commercial beef processing plants. , 2003, Journal of food protection.

[7]  G. A. Barkocy-Gallagher,et al.  Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Cattle and During Processing , 2002 .

[8]  J. Keen,et al.  Isolation of shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 from hide surfaces and the oral cavity of finished beef feedlot cattle. , 2002, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[9]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Microbial populations on animal hides and beef carcasses at different stages of slaughter in plants employing multiple-sequential interventions for decontamination. , 2000, Journal of food protection.

[10]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Effect of chemical dehairing on the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the levels of aerobic bacteria and enterobacteriaceae on carcasses in a commercial beef processing plant. , 2003, Journal of food protection.

[11]  T. Klopfenstein,et al.  Ecological relationships between the prevalence of cattle shedding Escherichia coli O157:H7 and characteristics of the cattle or conditions of the feedlot pen. , 2001, Journal of food protection.