Price Prediction in a Trading Agent Competition

The 2002 Trading Agent Competition (TAC) presented a challenging market game in the domain of travel shopping. One of the pivotal issues in this domain is uncertainty about hotel prices, which have a significant influence on the relative cost of alternative trip schedules. Thus, virtually all participants employ some method for predicting hotel prices. We survey approaches employed in the tournament, finding that agents apply an interesting diversity of techniques, taking into account differing sources of evidence bearing on prices. Based on data provided by entrants on their agents' actual predictions in the TAC-02 finals and semifinals, we analyze the relative efficacy of these approaches. The results show that taking into account game-specific information about flight prices is a major distinguishing factor. Machine learning methods effectively induce the relationship between flight and hotel prices from game data, and a purely analytical approach based on competitive equilibrium analysis achieves equal accuracy with no historical data. Employing a new measure of prediction quality, we relate absolute accuracy to bottom-line performance in the game.

[1]  David A. McAllester,et al.  Decision-Theoretic Bidding Based on Learned Density Models in Simultaneous, Interacting Auctions , 2003, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Peter Stone,et al.  The First International Trading Agent Competition: Autonomous Bidding Agents , 2005, Electron. Commer. Res..

[3]  Klaus Dorer,et al.  Agent-oriented software engineering for successful TAC participation , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[4]  Peter Stone Multiagent Competitions and Research: Lessons from RoboCup and TAC , 2002, RoboCup.

[5]  Peter Stone,et al.  Modeling Auction Price Uncertainty Using Boosting-based Conditional Density Estimation , 2002, ICML.

[6]  Bart Selman,et al.  WhiteBear: An Empirical Study of Design Tradeoffs for Autonomous Trading Agents , 2002 .

[7]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  TAC-03 - A Supply-Chain Trading Competition , 2003, AI Mag..

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  SouthamptonTAC: Designing a Successful Trading Agent , 2002, ECAI.

[9]  Amy Greenwald The 2002 Trading Agent Competition: An Overview of Agent Strategies , 2003, AI Mag..

[10]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Walverine: a Walrasian trading agent , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[11]  Prosenjit Bose,et al.  Fast approximations for sums of distances, clustering and the Fermat-Weber problem , 2003, Computational geometry.

[12]  K. Arrow,et al.  General Competitive Analysis , 1971 .

[13]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  The 2001 trading agent competition , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  SouthamptonTAC: An adaptive autonomous trading agent , 2003, TOIT.

[15]  Bart Selman,et al.  A principled study of the design tradeoffs for autonomous trading agents , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[16]  Amy Greenwald,et al.  Bid determination in simultaneous actions an agent architecture , 2001, EC '01.