CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon

Abstract. The aim of this study was to determine whether intravenous (IV) glucagon and dual positioning administered prior to CT colonography enhances colonic distention. We assessed the effect of dual positioning and IV glucagon on colonic distention in 96 patients who underwent CT colonography examinations. The CT colonography was performed in both supine and prone positions. Seventy-four patients received glucagon (1 mg i.v.) immediately prior to CT scanning and 22 patients did not. The bowel was divided into ten segments and colonic distention was scored by two radiologists in the supine, prone, and combined supine/prone positions using a five-point scale: 1=collapsed; 2=poorly visualized; ≥3=adequate distention; 4=entire segment visualized and well distended; 5=excellent distention). A combined segmental and overall supine/prone distention score was calculated based on the sum of the mean score for each position. There was no significant difference in the degree of colonic distention between patients who received glucagon and those who did not [supine/prone distention score (mean±SE): 3.63±0.2 vs 3.85±0.2; p=n.s.]. The degree of colonic distention was greater in the prone position in both the glucagon (3.87±0.2 vs 3.38±0.2; p<0.05) and non-glucagon groups (4.01±0.2 vs 3.69±0.2; p=N.S.) particularly in the proximal colon. There was almost perfect agreement between both radiologists in their scoring of colonic distention on a per-patient basis (k=0.9; p<0.001). Of 1480 bowel segments, 1261 (85.2%) were adequately distended in the glucagon group compared with 370 of 440 bowel segments (84%) in the non-glucagon group (p=n.s.) Colonic distention at CT colonography is improved by dual positioning but not by the administration of intravenous glucagon. While our results suggest that other smooth muscle relaxants, including butyl scopolamine, may only have a limited role in improving colonic distention in CT colonography, further studies are required.

[1]  D. Ott,et al.  Anaphylactic and allergic reactions during double-contrast studies: is glucagon or barium suspension the allergen? , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  J R Hecht,et al.  CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Isenberg,et al.  The effect of glucagon on barium-enema examination. , 1975, Radiology.

[4]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W. Lees,et al.  Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  A. Margulis,et al.  The state of radiographic technique in the examination of the colon: a survey. , 1978, Radiology.

[7]  R. Goei,et al.  Use of antispasmodic drugs in double contrast barium enema examination: glucagon or buscopan? , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[8]  S. Halligan,et al.  The effect of timing of intravenous muscle relaxant on the quality of double-contrast barium enema. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[9]  J Skucas,et al.  The use of antispasmodic drugs during barium enemas. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  R. Jurdi,et al.  Antispasmodic drugs to reduce discomfort and colonic spasm during barium enemas: comparison of oral hyoscyamine, i.v. glucagon, and no drug. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. Maglinte,et al.  Glucagon-induced small bowel air reflux: degrading effects on double-contrast colon examination. , 1989, Gastrointestinal radiology.

[12]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J G Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K R Hoffmann,et al.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  N. Senate.  Glucagon: Common Untoward Reactions Review and Recommendations' , 1990 .

[16]  G. Wolf,et al.  Glucagon and barium enema examinations: a controlled clinical trial. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  F. Kelvin,et al.  Discomfort during double-contrast barium enema examination: a placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation of the effect of glucagon and diazepam. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  R. E. Miller,et al.  Hypotonic colon examination with glucagon. , 1974, Radiology.

[19]  S D Wall,et al.  The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  A. Hara,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. , 1997, Radiology.

[21]  A. Margulis,et al.  The state of radiographic technique in the examination of the colon: a survey in 1987. , 1978, Radiology.

[22]  W R Lees,et al.  Technical report: spiral CT pneumocolon for suspected colonic neoplasms. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[23]  D. Ahlquist,et al.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening , 1999, Gut.

[24]  S. Wall,et al.  Effect of glucagon on the diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast barium enema examinations. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  D. Maglinte,et al.  The optimal dose of glucagon: what is enough. , 1992, Radiology.