Comparative study of the prognostic value of nuclear grade and silver‐binding nucleolar organizer region in renal cell carcinomas

Silver‐binding nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) and nuclear grade were histologically assessed in 112 renal cell carcinomas. Nuclear grade was better capable of stratification than AgNOR in terms of survival prediction. It also had prognostic significance when total metastatic rates were evaluated. Although higher mean AgNOR numbers were constantly associated with higher nuclear grades, two arbitrary classifications of AgNOR (<1.5, 1.5–3.5, >3.5; <2, 2–3, >3) failed to resolve the survival difference.

[1]  A. Evans,et al.  A critical evaluation of AgNOR counting in benign naevi and malignant melanoma , 1991, The Journal of pathology.

[2]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Nucleolar organizer regions and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma , 1991, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  A. Yang,et al.  Invasiveness of renal cell carcinoma--an in vitro model. , 1990, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[4]  J. Crocker,et al.  Nucleolar organiser regions in kidney tumours and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  J. Crocker Nucleolar organiser regions. , 1990, Current topics in pathology. Ergebnisse der Pathologie.

[6]  K. Plate,et al.  Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs). Basic concepts and practical application in tumor pathology. , 1989, Pathology, research and practice.

[7]  P. Quirke,et al.  Silver‐stained structures (AgNORs), their dependence on tissue fixation and absence of prognostic relevance in rectal adenocarcinoma , 1989, The Journal of pathology.

[8]  D. Boldy,et al.  How should we count AgNORS? Proposals for a standardized approach , 1989, The Journal of pathology.

[9]  A. Wright,et al.  Silver‐stained nucleoli and nucleolar organizer region counts are of no prognostic value in thick cutaneous malignant melanoma , 1988, The Journal of pathology.

[10]  L. Medeiros,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases , 1988, Cancer.

[11]  J. Crocker,et al.  Evaluation of nucleolar organizer region‐associated proteins in breast malignancy , 1988, Histopathology.

[12]  J. Baak,et al.  Nuclear morphometry as an important prognostic factor in stage I renal cell carcinoma , 1986, Cancer.

[13]  W. Thoenes,et al.  Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas and carcinomas). The basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostics. , 1986, Pathology, research and practice.

[14]  H. Baisch,et al.  Prognosis of renal cell carcinoma related to nuclear grade, DNA content and Robson stage. , 1986, European urology.

[15]  G. Roos,et al.  DNA content in renal cell carcinoma with reference to tumor heterogeneity , 1985, Cancer.

[16]  H. Huland,et al.  Tumor cell deoxyribonucleic acid content and prognosis in human renal cell carcinoma. , 1984, The Journal of urology.

[17]  M. Nap,et al.  Malignant granular cell tumor. Report of a case with special reference to carcinoembryonic antigen. , 1982, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[18]  S. Fuhrman,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 1982, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  D. Skinner,et al.  Renal carcinoma: computer analysis of 96 patients treated by nephrectomy. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[20]  K. Syrjänen,et al.  Grading of human renal adenocarcinoma. , 1978, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[21]  R. Colvin,et al.  Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma A clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases , 1971, Cancer.