Writing narrative style literature reviews

AbstractReviews provide a synthesis of published literature on a topic and describe its current state-of-art. Reviews in clinical research are thus useful when designing studies or developing practice guidelines. The two standard types of reviews are (a) systematic and (b) non-systematic or narrative review. Unlike systematic reviews that benefit from guidelines such as PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, there are no acknowledged guidelines for narrative reviews. I have attempted to define the best practice recommendations for the preparation of a narrative review in clinical research. The quality of a narrative review may be improved by borrowing from the systematic review methodologies that are aimed at reducing bias in the selection of articles for review and employing an effective bibliographic research strategy. The dynamics of narrative review writing, the organizational pattern of the text, the analysis, and the synthesis processes are also discussed.

[1]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. , 2013, Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue.

[2]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[3]  C. Murphy Writing an Effective Review Article , 2012, Journal of Medical Toxicology.

[4]  G. Holmquist,et al.  Algorithm for writing a scientific manuscript , 2009, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[5]  Justus J. Randolph A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. , 2009 .

[6]  P. Cronin,et al.  Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. , 2008, British journal of nursing.

[7]  David Moher,et al.  Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[8]  Marco Pautasso,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[10]  Thomas M Annesley,et al.  How to write a rave review. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Lawrence M. Rudner Scoring and Classifying Examinees Using Measurement Decision Theory , 2009 .

[12]  R. Hunt,et al.  Systematic Reviews: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2009, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  A. Bolderston Writing an Effective Literature Review. , 2008, Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences.

[14]  Ray Pawson,et al.  RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[15]  B. Green,et al.  Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. , 2006, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[16]  G. Kitas,et al.  Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors , 2011, Rheumatology International.

[17]  J. Stockman How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2009 .

[18]  B. Fauser,et al.  Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. , 2005, Human reproduction update.

[19]  C. A. Guimarães Structured abstracts: narrative review. , 2006, Acta cirurgica brasileira.

[20]  H. Bastian,et al.  Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[21]  S. Shepperd,et al.  Comparison of Alternative Evidence Summary and Presentation Formats in Clinical Guideline Development: A Mixed-Method Study , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  Ray Pawson,et al.  RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews , 2013, BMC Medicine.