The stiffness of a parallel manipulator is not only concerned with its detailed structure but also affected by the allocation scheme of actuators. Even though the precise values of stiffness cannot be derived since the link structure is not definitive at the stage of mechanism design, the effect of the allocation of actuators on the mechanism stiffness can be qualitatively evaluated in order to guild the optimal allocation. In this paper, the mechanism stiffness of a parallel manipulator is classified into the actuated stiffness and the structural stiffness. The actuated stiffness is obtained through the principle of virtual displacement and Jacobian matrix, and it is presented as a stiffness matrix which contains all the stiffness components and maps the stiffness of each actuator into the stiffness of the moving platform. The proposed analysis method of the actuated stiffness is suitable for all types of actuators. The structural stiffness is analyzed based on the principle of virtual force. A parallel mechanism is converted into a stationary structure when all active joints are frozen. The stationary structure is regarded as the combination of the basic links which are categorized according to their geometric shapes, join types, and load conditions. The proposed analysis method of structural stiffness takes account of all kinds of internal forces such as axial force, shearing force, bending moment, and torque. It can be seen that the allocation scheme of actuators plays an important role in the contribution to the stiffness of a parallel mechanism. The stiffness analysis that is usually investigated at the stage of structure design in the traditional process of mechanical design is considered in anticipation at the stage of mechanism design in the proposed approach. The stiffness of the moving platform affected by the allocation of actuators is analyzed through the simplified mechanism model without the detailed geometric shapes or physical parameters of link parts, which is able to guild the optimal selection of an allocation scheme of actuators at the early stage of the design process.
[1]
Fulei Chu,et al.
Symmetrical characteristics of the workspace for spatial parallel mechanisms with symmetric structure
,
2008
.
[2]
A. M. Vaidya,et al.
A Performance Evaluation of Four Bar Mechanism Considering Flexibility of Links and Joints Stiffness
,
2010
.
[3]
Thomas Bonnemains,et al.
Stiffness Computation and Identification of Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools
,
2009
.
[4]
J. Yu,et al.
Analyses of the stiffness and elastic deformation of a 2(3-SPR) serial—parallel manipulator
,
2009
.
[5]
Javad Enferadi,et al.
Accuracy and stiffness analysis of a 3-RRP spherical parallel manipulator
,
2011,
Robotica.
[6]
Jun Wu,et al.
Study on the stiffness of a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool with actuation redundancy
,
2009
.
[7]
Charles Pinto,et al.
A methodology for static stiffness mapping in lower mobility parallel manipulators with decoupled motions
,
2010,
Robotica.
[8]
Takashi Suehiro,et al.
Stiffness Analysis and Design of a Compact Modified Delta Parallel Mechanism
,
2004,
Robotica.
[9]
Xiaolin Hu,et al.
Design, analysis, and stiffness optimization of a three degree of freedom parallel manipulator
,
2009,
Robotica.
[10]
Qingsong Xu,et al.
An investigation on mobility and stiffness of a 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator via screw theory
,
2008
.
[11]
Marco Ceccarelli,et al.
Comparison of indices for stiffness performance evaluation
,
2010
.
[12]
Damien Chablat,et al.
Stiffness Analysis of Overconstrained Parallel Manipulators
,
2009,
ArXiv.
[13]
Marco Ceccarelli,et al.
A stiffness analysis for a hybrid parallel-serial manipulator
,
2004,
Robotica.