On the psychological reality of party identification: Evidence from the accessibility of voting intentions and of partisan feelings

[1]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  Response Latency and the Accessibility of Voting Intentions: What Contributes to Accessibility and How it Affects Vote Choice , 1995 .

[2]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. , 1995 .

[3]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[4]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[5]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  RESPONSE LATENCY VERSUS CERTAINTY AS INDEXES OF THE STRENGTH OF VOTING INTENTIONS IN A CATI SURVEY , 1993 .

[6]  C. Franklin.  Measurement and the dynamics of party identification , 1992 .

[7]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1992 .

[8]  S. Feldman,et al.  A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences , 1992 .

[9]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research , 1992 .

[10]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for CATI and a new look at nonattitudes. , 1991 .

[11]  Warren E. Miller.  Party Identification, Realignment, and Party Voting: Back to the Basics , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[13]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Construct accessibility and electoral choice , 1989 .

[14]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[15]  P. Kenney,et al.  Presidential Prenomination Preferences and Candidate Evaluations , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[16]  P. Whiteley.  The Causal Relationships between Issues, Candidate Evaluations, Party Identification, and Vote Choice--the View From "Rolling Thunder" , 1988, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  R. Brody,et al.  The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election , 1988, British Journal of Political Science.

[18]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  John E. Jackson,et al.  The Dynamics of Party Identification , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[22]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[23]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[24]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[25]  M. Traugott,et al.  Response Validity in Surveysof Voting Behavior , 1979 .

[26]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[27]  D. Boyd.  Rolling Thunder , 1974 .

[28]  R. Kraut,et al.  How Being Interviewed Affects Voting: An Experiment , 1973 .

[29]  F. Greenstein.  Children and Politics , 1970 .

[30]  Aage R. Clausen.  RESPONSE VALIDITY: VOTE REPORT , 1968 .

[31]  A. Campbell.  Elections and the Political Order , 1968 .

[32]  A. Goldberg.  Discerning a Causal Pattern among Data on Voting Behavior , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[33]  D. Apter,et al.  Ideology and discontent , 1966 .

[34]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[35]  G. Gurin,et al.  The Voter Decides , 1954 .