Outcome of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Ureterolithotomy for Proximal Ureteric Stones - Our Two Years Experiences

To evaluate the results of laparoscopic transperitoneal uteterolithotomy for management of large proximal ureteric stones. This study was performed on 24 patients having proximal ureteric stone greater than 1.5cm at the Department of Urology, Shahid Sheik Abu Naser Specialized Hospital, Khulna, Bangladesh from January 2016 to December 2017. Patients having stone size less than 1.5cm, previous abdominal surgery and sepsis were excluded from this study. Patients characteristics, stone characteristics, perioperative and follow-up data were studied. Twenty-four patients (mean age=52.9±12 years) with large upper ureteric stones (mean stone diameter=35±12) were included. Twenty-two patients had single stone and 2 patients had two stones. Mean operative time was 107±49.5 min with mean blood loss of 60.5±19.2 cc. Mean total pain score was 38.4±5.5 (100 point scale) and mean time resuming oral intake was 7.2±1 h. Mean duration of hospital stay was 2.6±1.4 days and mean time of stenting was 7.2±2 weeks. Throughout a mean duration of follow-up of 10.8±6.6 months 100% stone clearance rate was achieved with no recurrence. Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy is a safe and effective approach for selected patients with large proximal ureteric stones with reduced postoperative pain short hospital stays and cost effective and should be considered as a choice of treatment option for such stones.Medicine Today 2018 Vol.30(2): 71-73

[1]  E. Huri,et al.  Experiences in laparoscopic removal of upper ureteral stones: multicenter analysis of cases, based on the TurkUroLap Group. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[2]  W. Kongchareonsombat,et al.  Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in selected patients. , 2010, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[3]  A. Papatsoris,et al.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review , 2010, Urological Research.

[4]  D. Teber,et al.  Laparoscopic techniques for removal of renal and ureteral calculi. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[5]  S. Patankar,et al.  Which is the best option to treat large (>1.5 cm) midureteric calculi? , 2009, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[6]  Bruno De Oliveira,et al.  [Laparoscopic treatment of ureterolithiasis: our experience]. , 2009, Actas Urológicas Españolas.

[7]  F. L. Heldwein,et al.  Prospective trial comparing laparoscopy and open surgery for management of impacted ureteral stones. , 2009, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[8]  A. Basiri,et al.  Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[9]  H. Kanayama,et al.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Our experience with 74 cases , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[10]  A. Abolyosr Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for recurrent lower-ureteral stones previously treated with open ureterolithotomy: initial experience in 11 cases. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[11]  Ahmed S El-Feel,et al.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[12]  A. Basiri,et al.  Laparoscopic management of ureteral calculi: a report of 123 cases. , 2007, Urology journal.

[13]  F. Altunrende,et al.  When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones? , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[14]  P. Alken,et al.  Ureteral laparoscopic surgery. , 1995, Annales d'urologie.