Clinical algorithms for the screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in Turkish women.

OBJECTIVE: To test the diagnostic validity of clinical algorithms for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an urban population of married women in Turkey. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based survey. SUBJECTS: A systematic sample of 867 women who reported the use of contraceptive methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of clinical algorithms for the diagnosis of C trachomatis. RESULTS: C trachomatis was diagnosed in 4.89% of the women. The WHO algorithm for use in settings where no vaginal examination could be performed had a sensitivity of 9% and a specificity of 96%. The corresponding figures for the WHO algorithm incorporating the findings of a speculum examination were 47% and 56% respectively. Algorithms incorporating symptoms or signs other than those suggested by the WHO did not yield satisfactory standards of validity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study do not support the widespread introduction of the use of clinical decision models for screening of women for chlamydia infection in primary health care settings such as family planning or antenatal clinics. The large number of false positive results with the use of the clinical algorithms tested in this study would cause unnecessary costs to the health system and unnecessary interventions to the women treated.

[1]  J. Burczak,et al.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  Helen H. Lee,et al.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine , 1995, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Hayes,et al.  Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics. , 1995, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[4]  M. Laga Epidemiology and control of sexually transmitted diseases in developing countries. , 1994, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  P. Piot,et al.  Clinical algorithms for the screening of women for gonococcal and chlamydial infection: evaluation of pregnant women and prostitutes in Zaire. , 1993, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  R. Lande Controlling sexually transmitted diseases. , 1993 .

[7]  F. Meier,et al.  Derivation and validation of a clinical diagnostic model for chlamydial cervical infection in university women. , 1990, JAMA.

[8]  J. P. Davis,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis Infection In Women Attending Urban Midwestern Family Planning and Community Health Clinics: Risk Factors, Selective Screening, and Evaluation of Non‐culture Techniques , 1990, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[9]  P. Piot,et al.  Towards developing a diagnostic algorithm for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae cervicitis in pregnancy. , 1990, Genitourinary medicine.

[10]  H. Handsfield,et al.  Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics. , 1986, JAMA.

[11]  K. Holmes,et al.  Mucopurulent cervicitis--the ignored counterpart in women of urethritis in men. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Holmes,et al.  Nonspecific vaginitis: Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations , 1983 .

[13]  O. Jírovec,et al.  Trichomonas vaginalis and trichomoniasis. , 1968, Advances in parasitology.

[14]  R. Trussell,et al.  Triehomonas vaginalis and trichomoniasis. , 1947 .