Māori and non-Māori differences in caesarean section rates: a national review.

AIM To investigate the relationship between caesarean section (CS), deprivation, and ethnicity; and to examine Māori/non-Māori differences in CS after controlling for possible confounding factors. METHOD Total, acute, and elective CS rates (as proportions of women giving birth in New Zealand hospitals) during 1997-2001 were examined by ethnicity and area deprivation. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, deprivation, some clinical factors, and District Health Board (DHB). RESULTS Total, acute, and elective CS rates were significantly higher among non-Māori compared to Māori women (total CS, 21% vs 13%, ratio 1.59, p<0.0001). CS rates decreased with increasing levels of deprivation. After controlling for deprivation and age, differences between Māori (M) and non-Māori (nM) remained (total CS odds ratio nM:M 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.39-1.48; elective OR 1.44 (1.36-1.52); acute OR 1.38 (1.33-1.43)). Differences also remained after controlling for other factors including a limited number of clinical factors. CONCLUSION Results suggest that non-clinical factors may be contributing to ethnic differences in CS in New Zealand. While deprivation contributes to this difference it does not fully explain it. Further research is needed to investigate whether ethnic differences in CS impact on birth outcomes, and which factors, other than those clinically indicated, contribute to ethnic differences in caesarean section in New Zealand.

[1]  C. Mantell,et al.  Ethnicity and birth outcome: New Zealand trends 1980–2001. Part 1. Introduction, Methods, Results and Overview , 2004, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[2]  L. Capps.  Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare , 2003 .

[3]  J. Nazroo.  The structuring of ethnic inequalities in health: economic position, racial discrimination, and racism. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[4]  C. Truman,et al.  Influence of aboriginal and socioeconomic status on birth outcome and maternal morbidity. , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[5]  T. Blakely,et al.  Socio-economic position is more than just NZDep. , 2002, The New Zealand medical journal.

[6]  L. Sadler,et al.  Associations between ethnicity and obstetric intervention in New Zealand. , 2002, The New Zealand medical journal.

[7]  B. Horta,et al.  Ethnicity and infant health in Southern Brazil. A birth cohort study. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Camara P Jones,et al.  Invited commentary: "race," racism, and the practice of epidemiology. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  W. P. Frisbie,et al.  Race/ethnic differentials in heavy weight and cesarean births , 2000 .

[10]  Percy C. Magnus,et al.  Cesarean section among immigrants in Norway , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[11]  P. Crampton,et al.  Socioeconomic Deprivation and Ethnicity are both Important for Anti-tobacco Health Promotion , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[12]  D. Aron,et al.  Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance. , 2000, Medical care.

[13]  P. Crampton,et al.  NZDep91: A New Zealand index of deprivation , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[14]  P. Howden-Chapman,et al.  A cut above: the rising Caesarean section rate in New Zealand. , 1998, The New Zealand medical journal.

[15]  G. Ellison,et al.  Caesarean section rates in South Africa: evidence of bias among different 'population groups'. , 1998, Ethnicity & health.

[16]  D. Williams,et al.  Race and health: basic questions, emerging directions. , 1997, Annals of epidemiology.

[17]  D. N. Gow,et al.  The caesarean section , 1996, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  L. A. Woolbright.  Why is the cesarean delivery rate so high in Alabama? An examination of risk factors, 1991-1993. , 1996, Birth.

[19]  D. Ansell,et al.  Does ethnicity influence obstetric intervention? , 1995, The New Zealand medical journal.

[20]  P. Braveman,et al.  Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[21]  C. Thunhurst.  Deprivation and Health in Scotland , 1992 .

[22]  D. Roder,et al.  The Association of Maternal and Socioeconomic Characteristics in Metropolitan Adelaide with Medical, Obstetric and Labour Complications and Pregnancy Outcomes , 1992, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[23]  B. Borman,et al.  Caesarean section: a national study. , 1988, The New Zealand medical journal.